Ocean of (Allied) Blood.

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 24th June 1942

Post by bigred »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

ORIGINAL: vettim89

I wanted to chime in here and commend both players. I also wanted to add a note to support Yubari's decision to surrender. This mod is an AFB worse night mare from the get go. So to lose such an overwhelming battle at this point in the war is a far greater defeat than a similar result in Scenario 1 or even 2.

I hate to put words into John 3's mouth but I think the desired goal of the mod was to make the fun part of the game last longer. Giving the Japanese some advantages early in the war and especially mid war should change the nature of the game.

My only criticism for Yubari may be that your thinking was constructed around Scenario 1 OOB and force limitations. I understand the desire to do something but I have to wonder if you acted too soon and too boldly. This type of operation would have been a good idea in a non-Enhanced Japan scenario but probably was out of place here.

If I were to ever do a scenario, my goal would also be to extend the fun part of the game but I think I would focus more on reducing Allied capabilities rather than enhancing Japan's. Still I do like the idea of a game where late 1943 and early 1944 plays more like late 1942 and early 1943 does in most Scenario 1 games

That is well said Vettim.

The Andaman play by Yubari while the KB was invading Hawaii was brilliant. Yubari has shortened the war by 2 years. I came into the game w/ a "no rules" attitude. Maybe I need to continue on w/ the original HR set just to prove Yubari correct in his strategy.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 9th july 1942

Post by bigred »

FatR has moved mini KB into the slot between Andaman and Maya. He saw my small resupply ships visiting the islands. Seems jap LBA was unable to shut down my resupply effort so I expect Mini KB to be on station. Air attack on my resupply ship was delivered by Kaga-1. Ummm. Also hit an hdml which was acting as a picket ship. Mini KB is w/in 7 of allied LBA. No counter strike.

Note alot of jap transport activity which cannot occur w/out mini KB. I did expect FatR to split the KB after his epic victory in the Bay of Bengal.

Image
Attachments
FR 9jul 1.jpg
FR 9jul 1.jpg (122.26 KiB) Viewed 128 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 15th july 1942

Post by bigred »

I counted 8 fighter sqn sweeps at Andaman islands this turn. 3 over trinket and 5 at Little Andaman. No cap at trinket but had 125 fighters at 30% Cap over Little Andaman. The first two sweep over little A started w/ a A6m2 x27 sqn and the Oscar 47 plane Sqn. But the a6m3b wore down my defense. then 2 more Oscar Sqns beat me down bad.

Set up for Cap Defense at Little A :
16 Hurr 2b at 36000ft
16 hurr 2v at 35600ft
24 P40e at 29000ft
24 p39 @ 29000ft
24 p39@ 10000ft.
All sqns assigned to same Hq w/in 3 hexes.

Image
Attachments
better.jpg
better.jpg (48.11 KiB) Viewed 128 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: Bombs away, 17th july42.

Post by bigred »

Intell picked up this info around the 14th. 177 ships in harbor at Lahaini. On the first turn of arrival(16th) at pearl the b17s did not fly after the 60 hex rebase from the west coast.
I was on pins and needles worried about the LBs sitting on the air field. A strange thing happen the next day. Recon noted all the TFs at Lahani had disappeared. But the port ship count increased to 199.
No sweeps, not bombing missions by the Japs at Pearl.

So I figured FatF had seen the increase of bombers on his mouse over and thought them to be SBDs....and had pulled all his fighters into Cap over lahaini, and his ships into safe port.

Halsey in command of Pac. Tinker in charge of the 7th AF. Planes are in the air...We await the reports of action....



Image
Attachments
pearl 7-17-42.jpg
pearl 7-17-42.jpg (96.34 KiB) Viewed 128 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: Bombs away, 17th july42.

Post by bigred »

Combat report indicates 9 hits on the Fuso and Hyunga each with smaller amounts of damage to an AV and an AK. I hope FOG of war is on my side as I really needed to do a goodly amount of damage to a possible pearl invasion fleet. No Flak damage, how incredible. I have to decide if I should return next turn to Lahani for seconds before my surface fleet arrives.

Across the pacific at Port Blair, this is the 1st game I have ever seen 152 oscars show up for the same sweep. I must have been outnumbered 10 to 1. Shot down 9 oscars and lost some myself. But i am still flying and have plenty of replacement planes. Good thing i dont seem to be losing to many pilots..

And one of my pilots just got 15 kills...

Image
Attachments
lahani.jpg
lahani.jpg (100.83 KiB) Viewed 128 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: Bombs away, 17th july42.

Post by bigred »

FatR
By anemic Allied reaction and the garrizon full of fragments, I
recon you're not intending to seriously contest Trinkat... Well,
fine.

FatR does not know about the battalion of Grant tanks waiting for him. This should be interesting... Cuddos to yubari for the defensive set. I would suggest FatR train up his Guards regiment before he uses them in an amphibious assault.
Amphibious Assault at Trinkat

TF 46 troops unloading over beach at Trinkat, 44,64

Japanese ground losses:
2220 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 164 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 92 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 55 (1 destroyed, 54 disabled)
Vehicles lost 17 (0 destroyed, 17 disabled)



70mm T92 Howitzer lost overboard during unload of Guards Mixed Bde /1
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost overboard during unload of Guards Mixed Bde
10 Support troops lost in surf during unload of Guards Mixed Bde /4
10 Support troops lost in surf during unload of 4th Bde /2
17 troops of a SNLF Squad accidentally lost during unload of 1st Sasebo SNLF Coy /2
8 Aviation Support troops lost from landing craft during unload of 91st JAAF AF Bn /2



Image
Attachments
trinket.jpg
trinket.jpg (48.97 KiB) Viewed 128 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: Trinket, 20th july42.

Post by bigred »

edit
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

FatR tactical failure

Post by bigred »

FatR has failed to stop the surface resupply of the Andamans. The reason is he has lost all his land based zero's. The 152 Oscar raid was a move to establish air superiority, which failed.
Now FatR has only 3 remaining options to regain Air/sea superiority:
1. Use permanant KB2 on station. Even this will fatigue the planes and air crews.
2. Take Trinket then base his a6m3b as a air superiority weapon. I am sure he can take Trinket if he really wants it. I see it as a large jap prison camp. I will bomb the hell out of Trinket for target practice.
3. Use IJN surface sweeps whch will become expensive.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: FatR tactical failure

Post by bigred »

Humm, wonder what happens when allied tanks attack disrupted japs on the beach?

Image
Attachments
88159agt.jpg
88159agt.jpg (16.24 KiB) Viewed 129 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16005
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Bombs away, 17th july42.

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: bigred

I would suggest FatR train up his Guards regiment before he uses them in an amphibious assault.
Amphibious Assault at Trinkat

TF 46 troops unloading over beach at Trinkat, 44,64

Japanese ground losses:
2220 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 164 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 92 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 55 (1 destroyed, 54 disabled)
Vehicles lost 17 (0 destroyed, 17 disabled)



70mm T92 Howitzer lost overboard during unload of Guards Mixed Bde /1
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost overboard during unload of Guards Mixed Bde
10 Support troops lost in surf during unload of Guards Mixed Bde /4
10 Support troops lost in surf during unload of 4th Bde /2
17 troops of a SNLF Squad accidentally lost during unload of 1st Sasebo SNLF Coy /2
8 Aviation Support troops lost from landing craft during unload of 91st JAAF AF Bn /2

That most likely happened because FatR landed them with little or no prep of the target.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

AAR style

Post by bigred »

I sense I enjoy a different sort of AAR. I would like to invite my most respected opponent FatR to participate in this thread. I do not wish to present my future plans here(probably because I dont have any). But I will really enjoy talking about current or past victories(with alot of bombbast).

Also all readers be advised I will use psyops against FatR through this AAR to gain advantage in the field(as demonstrated w/ the above comments). I expect his and my comments to "stir a fire". I privately told him I call this "red meat for the spectators".

Readers feel free to copy any commentary to FatR Thread for historical[:D] purposes.


So let the headgames(AAR) begin.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: AAR style

Post by bigred »

At the request of FatR for several reasons we agreed I should start a new Thread for both of us to participate. This thread will remain an allied only thread.
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 24july

Post by bigred »

On 24 july42 the IJN withdrew from the Trinket Area.  In withdrawal the Atago was hit by a Torp.  I felt w/ the jap BBs on continued Bombbard commands I might be able to slip some Transports into PB, Lil andy and Car which did and has happened.  So the resupply effort is on the way.  Roughly 50000 tons..  I figure 3 days before I must withdraw these ships..Kb had an oportunity to engage these transporters but declined probably because they were w/in CAP of allied LBA.

W/ the arrival of the 1st US Army corp some west coast units (at the reduced PP price)(remember, no rules) are beginning to enter the game.

Cheap VP transport pickets are being placed at all uncovered PBY patrol areas. 

Yubari had invested 4 squadrons in low nav.  All these units are now in their 60exp range and ready for deployment.  I have read in the theads that these units will need a 70exp to do any thing....We will see if the IJN gets it's toe stumped at andamans...

i was one turn too late getting a surface combat BB TF into Lil andaman.  It took a final position at Lil andy hoping to catch a depleted Jap Bombardment TF, this may have caused the japs to pull back and reload...allowing me to really reload the islands w/ supply. 

I sense that FatR now has a healthy respect for allied fighter cap w/ the p38e present.  W/O the p38 at this recent Battle FatR really would have hurt the allied position.  Note the one Sqn of P38e was deployed into the most critical point of the grind.

All ftr sqns on andy and PB have one command-221HQ.  Each base has
2xhurr2b
1x p40e
1xp39
all set to range ? for mutual support. 

Bleinhams based in the andamans are on night bombing attacks at Sabang, VP, and Rangoon.  Seems to be working.

Reserve squadons (about 3x the amount at andamans) around India are training up as replacements for the future loses expected over Andamans.

17th indian division is flying in every turn to Trinket and I dont see a way for IJ to stop this unless he puts a KB2 next to Trinket, which is what i want . Then I know where he is plus if he makes a mistake he may lose a carrier to LBA.

There are ALOT of mines around trinket and the Andamans but I am not getting any reports of damage from these devices.

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
vicberg
Posts: 1178
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:29 am

RE: 24july

Post by vicberg »

Max range without drop tanks....if that doesn't work, then multiple LRCAP for support (with no target unless you are a gambler) :)
 
If you know where he's going to hit, then gamble away and put either LRCAP or Cap against that spot. 
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 31july

Post by bigred »

This turn the intel reported 10 ship Surface TF at Trinket w/ a trans fleet 300 n miles se headed nw.
3 sbd sqns from india rebased to Car nicobar for a naval attack w/ p40 escort. 

Last turn at Trinket blendiems night bombed w/ followup daylight 100ft sweep by p39s.  Wierd result as the p39s shot down 8 oscars at 100 feet and lost only 2 planes...
Morning Air attack on Trinkat , at 44,64

Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid detected at 32 NM, estimated altitude 5,100 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M3b Zero x 3
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 30



Allied aircraft
P-39D Airacobra x 20


Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 8 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-39D Airacobra: 2 destroyed, 2 damaged



Aircraft Attacking:
2 x P-39D Airacobra strafing at 100 feet *

CAP engaged:
Kagoshima-2 Ku S-1 with A6M3b Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 3 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 15000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 1 minutes
59th Sentai with Ki-43-Ic Oscar (0 airborne, 9 on standby, 13 scrambling)
9 plane(s) intercepting now.
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 4 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 38500 , scrambling fighters between 2000 and 4000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 9 minutes
64th Sentai with Ki-43-Ic Oscar (4 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
4 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 38500
Raid is overhead
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 31july

Post by bigred »

I figure it must be the gun value...plus the oscar had to come down from 38000 feet.

Image
Attachments
p39 vs oscar.jpg
p39 vs oscar.jpg (53.3 KiB) Viewed 128 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 31july

Post by witpqs »

I figure the Oscar got to use the same maneuver-band that the P-39 got to use. More likely it was other differences that overcame the Oscar's advantage in Maneuverability: Gun, Durability, Armor, and Speed. A big difference in speed. Differences in pilots are unknown but could be significant.
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 1 august...

Post by bigred »

In the air over Trinket and Little andaman..

Image
Attachments
trinket3.jpg
trinket3.jpg (52.02 KiB) Viewed 128 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 1 august...

Post by bigred »

The first SBD attack at trinket cleared thru but failed to score any hits.  marine exp in the low 60s.



Image
Attachments
trinket.jpg
trinket.jpg (84.54 KiB) Viewed 128 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
User avatar
bigred
Posts: 4017
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:15 am

RE: 1 august...

Post by bigred »

The a24 strike caught a mine layer at sea w/ no cap.

Image
Attachments
trinket 2.jpg
trinket 2.jpg (50.88 KiB) Viewed 128 times
---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
tm.asp?m=2597400
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”