WITP AE AAR Feb 09 Cathartes-JRCAR (Jap)

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: 17-18 Dec

Post by pad152 »

ORIGINAL: jrcar

You need airsupport to fly. There are company size units for small bases, or you use an AV etc.

I don't think AV etc supply torps to torpedo aircraft, Don will have to confirm.

Cheers
Rob
ORIGINAL: pad152

So do you need an AF Bn to fly a torpedo float plane w/torp out of some back water Atol?

Do (AV, AVD, CS, etc.) still supply Torpedoes to float planes?

This also raises the issue of torpedo resupply for Japanese CS (float plane carriers and the I-400 class subs) for torpedo float planes.

Japan attacked Pearl Harbor again in late January of 1942 using float planes resupplied by subs flying for the French Frigate shoal.

Can Sub tenders resupply torpedoes for subs?
jrcar
Posts: 2301
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:16 pm
Location: Seymour, Australia

RE: 17-18 Dec

Post by jrcar »

Someone has to drive the staff officers around!

Actually I think it is to increase the "cost" of loosing one of these units, so that people don't throw them around, and if they do they suffer consequences.

Cheers

Rob
ORIGINAL: pad152

Why do Air HQ's have motorized support?
AE BETA Breaker
jrcar
Posts: 2301
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:16 pm
Location: Seymour, Australia

RE: 17-18 Dec

Post by jrcar »

I will let someone else from the team answer this.

Cheers

Rob
ORIGINAL: pad152
ORIGINAL: jrcar

You need airsupport to fly. There are company size units for small bases, or you use an AV etc.

I don't think AV etc supply torps to torpedo aircraft, Don will have to confirm.

Cheers
Rob
ORIGINAL: pad152

So do you need an AF Bn to fly a torpedo float plane w/torp out of some back water Atol?

Do (AV, AVD, CS, etc.) still supply Torpedoes to float planes?

This also raises the issue of torpedo resupply for Japanese CS (float plane carriers and the I-400 class subs) for torpedo float planes.

Japan attacked Pearl Harbor again in late January of 1942 using float planes resupplied by subs flying for the French Frigate shoal.

Can Sub tenders resupply torpedoes for subs?
AE BETA Breaker
jrcar
Posts: 2301
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:16 pm
Location: Seymour, Australia

RE: 17-18 Dec

Post by jrcar »

19-20 Dec 1941

Another interception mid turn:

Night Time Surface Combat, near Legaspi at 93,82, Range 5,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Natori
DD Satsuki
DD Minazuki
DD Fumizuki
DD Nagatsuki
DD Harukaze
DD Hatakaze

Allied Ships
xAP Neptuna, Shell hits 21, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk


The hunted becomes the hunter...
Sub attack near Victoria at 207,52

Japanese Ships
SS I-23

Allied Ships
PG Charleston, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
DD Kane
PC Crawford



SS I-23 launches 6 torpedoes at PG Charleston
I-23 diving deep ....
DD Kane fails to find sub, continues to search...
PC Crawford fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Kane fails to find sub, continues to search...
PC Crawford fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Kane fails to find sub, continues to search...
PC Crawford fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Kane fails to find sub, continues to search...
PC Crawford fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub


Kuching and Singkawang are invaded, no response from the Allies.... yet!

the advance continues in the Pilipines and Malay, but no real action yet.

The Hunters find the hunted...

ASW attack near Coal Harbour at 199,57

Japanese Ships
SS I-6, hits 3

Allied Ships
DD Kane
PC Crawford

ASW attack near Victoria at 207,51

Japanese Ships
SS I-171, hits 2

Allied Ships
DD Hatfield
DD Gilmer
DD Fox



The brand new Oscar 1C are blooded over Rangoon, results are lopsided (I like it that way!) I have better pilots, altitude, and numbers)

Morning Air attack on Rangoon , at 54,53

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 10


Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 10


Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 4 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 6 destroyed



Aircraft Attacking:
2 x Ki-43-Ic Oscar sweeping at 25000 feet

CAP engaged:
No.67 Sqn RAF with Buffalo I (0 airborne, 7 on standby, 0 scrambling)
7 plane(s) intercepting now.
3 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters to 10000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 1 minutes

Raid spotted at 38 NM, estimated altitude 26,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes


The storm is gathering in a number of locations.

Cheers

Rob
AE BETA Breaker
bradfordkay
Posts: 8590
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: 17-18 Dec

Post by bradfordkay »

So they can skedaddle quickly? 
fair winds,
Brad
snuffl
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2002 8:55 pm

RE: 17-18 Dec

Post by snuffl »

One question to raid detection:
Don't know if it was mentioned before but what about an allied raid flying from Lunga to Rabaul. It has to cross hexes and bases which are japanese controlled. Does this give a bonus to Raid detection? I remember this from a former game called burning steel 2 i think when your raids were being tracked by coastwatchers which helped you a lot preparing your CAP.
Sorry for my broken english ...
User avatar
traskott
Posts: 1574
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:30 am
Location: Valladolid, Spain

RE: 17-18 Dec

Post by traskott »

How does naval support affect ships in the port ? ie: How much "naval support" takes every type of ship ?. 
User avatar
cantona2
Posts: 3749
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Gibraltar

RE: 17-18 Dec

Post by cantona2 »

Rob
 
Could it be possible to show some screenies of early war Jap planes that were not in WitP please?
 
Cheers
1966 was a great year for English Football...Eric was born

User avatar
Blackhorse
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Eastern US

RE: 17-18 Dec

Post by Blackhorse »

ORIGINAL: jrcar

Someone has to drive the staff officers around!

Actually I think it is to increase the "cost" of loosing one of these units, so that people don't throw them around, and if they do they suffer consequences.

Cheers

Rob
ORIGINAL: pad152

Why do Air HQ's have motorized support?

Some HQs have motorized support to increase the *load* cost of the unit. Motorized support represents all of the equipment and vehicles in a HQ that can best be carried on a AK transport (as opposed to personnel on a AP).

US Army Headquarters, for example, had hundreds of trucks in motor pool battalions that were 'lent' to lower-echelon units for troop movements and supplies.

Man-for-man aviation and related support units tended to have significantly more vehicles than traditional army units. For example, a typical Aviation Engineer Battalion had about 600 men -- and 100 vehicles!
WitP-AE -- US LCU & AI Stuff

Oddball: Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?
Moriarty: Crap!
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: 17-18 Dec

Post by m10bob »

jrcar sez : "The brand new Oscar 1C are blooded over Rangoon, results are lopsided (I like it that way!) I have better pilots, altitude, and numbers)

Morning Air attack on Rangoon , at 54,53

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 10


Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 10


Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 4 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 6 destroyed



Aircraft Attacking:
2 x Ki-43-Ic Oscar sweeping at 25000 feet

CAP engaged:
No.67 Sqn RAF with Buffalo I (0 airborne, 7 on standby, 0 scrambling)
7 plane(s) intercepting now.
3 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters to 10000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 1 minutes

Raid spotted at 38 NM, estimated altitude 26,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes
"



FINALLY!...The Oscar is worthy of its' historical counterpart in the early days...............

BTW...Love the AAR's..

Image

Cathartes
Posts: 1585
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:00 am

21-22 Dec

Post by Cathartes »

Dec. 21-22, 1941
A few punches back and forth all over the Pacific. More Oscars show up over Rangoon, but this time the AVG is waiting:

Afternoon Air attack on Rangoon , at 54,53

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Japanese aircraft
     Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 18

Allied aircraft
     H81-A3 x 38

Japanese aircraft losses
     Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 4 destroyed, 6 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
     H81-A3: 1 destroyed, 37 damaged

CAP engaged:
AVG/1st Sqn with H81-A3 (0 airborne, 12 on standby, 0 scrambling)
     12 plane(s) intercepting now.
     6 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
     Group patrol altitude is 25000 , scrambling fighters between 17000 and 28000.
     Time for all group planes to reach interception is 26 minutes
AVG/2nd Sqn with H81-A3 (0 airborne, 14 on standby, 0 scrambling)
     14 plane(s) intercepting now.
     6 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
     Group patrol altitude is 25000 , scrambling fighters between 18000 and 31000.
     Time for all group planes to reach interception is 29 minutes

Raid detected at 14 NM, estimated altitude 29,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes


A raid the next day catches the AVG outnumbered and the Oscars fly away unscathed:

Afternoon Air attack on Rangoon , at 54,53


Weather in hex: Severe storms

Japanese aircraft
     Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 17

Allied aircraft
     H81-A3 x 7


Japanese aircraft losses
     Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 2 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
     H81-A3: 2 destroyed, 3 damaged

Aircraft Attacking:
     16 x Ki-43-Ic Oscar sweeping at 25000 feet

CAP engaged:
AVG/1st Sqn with H81-A3 (0 airborne, 2 on standby, 0 scrambling)
     2 plane(s) intercepting now.
     1 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
     Group patrol altitude is 25000 , scrambling fighters to 25000.
     Time for all group planes to reach interception is 14 minutes
AVG/2nd Sqn with H81-A3 (0 airborne, 3 on standby, 0 scrambling)
     3 plane(s) intercepting now.
     1 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
     Group patrol altitude is 25000 , scrambling fighters to 25000.
     Time for all group planes to reach interception is 24 minutes

Raid spotted at 24 NM, estimated altitude 31,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 8 minutes



I sneak in a dozen, well-rested Vildebeests from Singapore over to Kuching/Singkawang area as an invasion is in progress at both bases. Because they left Singapore they could not use torpedoes. Nonetheless, bombs cause damage too, and they manage a few hits on transports, one hit on the DD Hatsuyuki, and two 500lb bombs score on the CA Kumano. I don't think jrcar was expecting these crates, and I reckoned he didn't have air cover in the area. Well-rested Allied air in the DEI can score if you manage to catch the Japanese parked off an invasion hex.  Always helps A LOT if Oscar and Zero are absent from school that day.

I lose a couple more transports trying to flee the PI. 

I get trounced by Zeros on sweep over Clark Field (Rob can say more). 

ASW lights up all over the map, with a Dutch sub getting beat up badly, but I find a number of Japanese subs off the US/Canada west coast sneaking around. I don't sink any, but I manage to hurl depth charges at about 5 different subs from San Clemente Island to Victoria Island, damaging a few of them.  Of course, there is considerable FOW.  Maybe I got lucky with one?
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 21-22 Dec

Post by witpqs »

Pardon my ignorance - what the heck is an H81-A3? [&:]
Alikchi2
Posts: 1786
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:29 pm
Contact:

RE: 21-22 Dec

Post by Alikchi2 »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Pardon my ignorance - what the heck is an H81-A3? [&:]

Hawk 81 =) pre-production P-40 I think
User avatar
treespider
Posts: 5781
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:34 am
Location: Edgewater, MD

RE: 21-22 Dec

Post by treespider »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Pardon my ignorance - what the heck is an H81-A3? [&:]


A Hawk 81-A-3

Image
Attachments
h81a301.jpg
h81a301.jpg (147.55 KiB) Viewed 189 times
Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910
User avatar
kfmiller41
Posts: 1063
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 9:00 pm
Location: Saint Marys, Ga
Contact:

RE: 21-22 Dec

Post by kfmiller41 »

Now that's service[X(]
You have the ability to arouse various emotions in me: please select carefully.
User avatar
Klahn
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:26 pm

RE: 21-22 Dec

Post by Klahn »

H81 was the Curtis model number. The H81-A3 designation is probably used because the AVG wasn't officially an Army Air Corp outfit so their aircraft didn't carry the P-40 designator. The H81-A3 was a cross between the P-40B and the P-40C. It carried the armament and armor of the C, but the engine of the B. It was delivered without military hardware due to US neutrality.
User avatar
aciddrinker
Posts: 135
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:03 pm
Location: Poland

RE: 21-22 Dec

Post by aciddrinker »

ORIGINAL: Cathartes

Dec. 21-22, 1941
A few punches back and forth all over the Pacific. More Oscars show up over Rangoon, but this time the AVG is waiting:

Afternoon Air attack on Rangoon , at 54,53

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Japanese aircraft
     Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 18

Allied aircraft
     H81-A3 x 38
...

Allied aircraft losses
     H81-A3: 1 destroyed, 37 damaged


...

how long it take to repair this 37 damaged?
User avatar
Erik Rutins
Posts: 39652
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

RE: 21-22 Dec

Post by Erik Rutins »

ORIGINAL: aciddrinker
how long it take to repair this 37 damaged?

That totally depends - first off, you have fog of war involved in the report. Second, assuming that 37 damaged was actually accurate, it could have been 5 planes each damaged ~7 times or something like that as well. Heavily damaged planes, assuming they survive landing, take more time to repair than just a few bullet holes. WITP AE now tracks damage properly by plane and keeps track of it across turns, so damage is meaningful (assuming the FOW-based report is accurate).

Regards,

- Erik
Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC


Image

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.
User avatar
Chad Harrison
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Boise, ID - USA

RE: 21-22 Dec

Post by Chad Harrison »

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

ORIGINAL: aciddrinker
how long it take to repair this 37 damaged?

That totally depends - first off, you have fog of war involved in the report. Second, assuming that 37 damaged was actually accurate, it could have been 5 planes each damaged ~7 times or something like that as well. Heavily damaged planes, assuming they survive landing, take more time to repair than just a few bullet holes. WITP AE now tracks damage properly by plane and keeps track of it across turns, so damage is meaningful (assuming the FOW-based report is accurate).

Regards,

- Erik

Wait, its no longer only two states: damaged or un-damaged? There are now degree's of damage? [X(]

You guys need to tone down the 'awesome' and 'mindblowing' levels of this game, its getting out of hand. [:D]
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 21-22 Dec

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Chad Harrison

You guys need to tone down the 'awesome' and 'mindblowing' levels of this game, its getting out of hand. [:D]

Ixnay on the tone-downnay.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”