TopEverest vs Admiral Kamikaze - the rematch

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4803
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: Destroyed units update

Post by M60A3TTS »

ORIGINAL: topeverest

This is yet one more thing I am working on.

here is a view of last turn.



ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

One strange thing I see is it doesn't appear that your Kalinin and N. Caucasus Fronts are full strength. Are most of your fronts at 90CP now?


Image


It seems like this is another case where you really need to manage better. You're creating all these STAVKA armies, but it seems like you could put at least 18 armies worth of troops just in the fronts you have.

Bryansk Front as an example. With the CP of the front short 50, that's nearly 3 armies worth of troops. Either

a) You don't have 4-5 armies in Bryansk Front

or

b) The armies you have need a lot more divisions in which case there is no need to build new armies.
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Destroyed units update

Post by topeverest »

Agree entirely.

I find unwinding many of my earlier mistakes very tough to do in any timely fashion.
But I am trying


ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

One strange thing I see is it doesn't appear that your Kalinin and N. Caucasus Fronts are full strength. Are most of your fronts at 90CP now?


==========================

It seems like this is another case where you really need to manage better. You're creating all these STAVKA armies, but it seems like you could put at least 18 armies worth of troops just in the fronts you have.

Bryansk Front as an example. With the CP of the front short 50, that's nearly 3 armies worth of troops. Either

a) You don't have 4-5 armies in Bryansk Front

or

b) The armies you have need a lot more divisions in which case there is no need to build new armies.
[/quote]
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Enem elite units tracking

Post by topeverest »

I started doing this after the strategic surprise attack on Moscow last winter.

Vast majority of these units seem spotted but I don't have a German OOB at my fingertips and I have not pulled it out of the game yet.

No need as long as so many are spotted.



Image
Attachments
enemy.jpg
enemy.jpg (223.06 KiB) Viewed 202 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Tuurn 106 June 24, 1943

Post by topeverest »

Russians launch a large offensive in the Stalingrad area.

So this is my first attempt at coordinating a big offensive, and despite turns of planning it went far away from plan. My plan was to pincer from Boguchar and Stalingrad, but I didn't quite close the pincer, and these troops will mostly get away, plus there is some damage I will take to my leading edge armor. I put my exploiting armor too far back, and that was the difference in closing the pincer. in all reality I should have tried something less aggressive, because getting across the Don against troops that had been dig in for 6 months was way tougher than I expected.

Live and learn. It hasn't been a total loss, and I am across the Don. I feel like I can continue with momentum until he commits major armor, at which time, I plan to launch another offensive elsewhere.

time will tell.

In other news, the enemy has one major offensive in the Maikop area. They are one hex away.



Image
Attachments
mapii.jpg
mapii.jpg (809.31 KiB) Viewed 203 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Tuurn 107 July 1, 1943

Post by topeverest »

Russian offensive continues - Germany begins a general withdrawal to avoid large pockets.

1. Vast bulk assault armies are across the Don, and pushing south and west
2. In the area between Boguchar, Stalingrad and Rostov, the Germans are in general withdrawal in a race to the Rostov corner
3. Germany abandons the Maikop offensive and is abandoning the Caucuses, most troops headed towards Rostov
4. It seems quite unlikely I can prevent virtually all of the units from getting away
5. Russian units surround and assault 8 german units, and 6of them route through to German lines. Nice ratio, as it has never happened to me once
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Combat theater map

Post by topeverest »

here is the map. The race is on.




Image
Attachments
8766.jpg
8766.jpg (850.36 KiB) Viewed 202 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

SUpport Units

Post by topeverest »

In other news, I worked out a theoretical entire game of AP, CP, and front assignment complete with necessary units to build. Boy I with I KNEW that when I started! At least I have a blueprint for my next game.

I have been spending my APs getting SU's in every:
1. guard infantry corps and all cavalry corps - Sapper regiment and tank regiment
2. Armor corps - Guards heavy tank and sapper regiments

Also just did RR Engineers in a few more armies and fronts

Andy M
Sammy5IsAlive
Posts: 639
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 11:01 pm

RE: SUpport Units

Post by Sammy5IsAlive »

How come you are routing the surrounded units and not waiting a turn to get them to surrender? The Axis seem to be in retreat here so it doesn't seem to me that you are facing a big risk of the pockets getting broken? Or are the Axis retreating because you've already routed the surrounded units and so there is nothing to 'save'?
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: SUpport Units

Post by topeverest »

Thanks for the information. I did not know supply was the main factor that drives surrender.
ORIGINAL: Sammy5IsAlive

How come you are routing the surrounded units and not waiting a turn to get them to surrender? The Axis seem to be in retreat here so it doesn't seem to me that you are facing a big risk of the pockets getting broken? Or are the Axis retreating because you've already routed the surrounded units and so there is nothing to 'save'?
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Turn 108 July 8, 1943

Post by topeverest »

Heavy fighting continues

1. Germans complete withdrawal across Kerch and behind Don below Stalingrad. German MLR is strong but not in depth. That said a number of reserves have been spotted
2. Russians change axis of attack to west from Boguchar, making some progress
3. Russians begin attacking between Voronezh and Boguchar, making some progress
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Map

Post by topeverest »

Here is a map of the change of action.

German troops are stronger in the salient, but north of it is much weaker. Russians changed attack axes and began attacking west.



Image
Attachments
7688.jpg
7688.jpg (629.7 KiB) Viewed 202 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

In other news

Post by topeverest »

Soviets destroy the very first enemy division sized units.

Wow - cant believe it took this long.



Image
Attachments
y666.jpg
y666.jpg (33.3 KiB) Viewed 202 times
Andy M
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4803
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: In other news

Post by M60A3TTS »

You are moving probably half a million men into an area you need about thirty thousand.

Image

To review when territory flips where there are ports involved, you need to control all the ports and have a series of contiguous hexes under your control.

In this case, what you really need to do is send three units to take the circled ports.

Image

Once you do that, all that ground is going to flip over to you. If he has indeed already pulled back to Rostov, you're just moving a lot of extra units that could be employed elsewhere into empty territory you could take with three units. You have time to win this, but you don't want to waste it either.
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: In other news

Post by topeverest »

Once again, much appreciated.
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

You are moving probably half a million men into an area you need about thirty thousand.



To review when territory flips where there are ports involved, you need to control all the ports and have a series of contiguous hexes under your control.

In this case, what you really need to do is send three units to take the circled ports.


Once you do that, all that ground is going to flip over to you. If he has indeed already pulled back to Rostov, you're just moving a lot of extra units that could be employed elsewhere into empty territory you could take with three units. You have time to win this, but you don't want to waste it either.
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Losses

Post by topeverest »

Losses have been very manageable this season. Despite numerous large armored contests, the losses have been surprisingly low.



Image
Attachments
754.jpg
754.jpg (214.77 KiB) Viewed 202 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Air war

Post by topeverest »

The air war has settled into a pattern. The enemy has chosen to set his fighters to support interdiction, and he owns that. In response, I do ground attack unimpeded except around the edges. I target main battle formations and exposed HQs. On HQ's I can get up to 1500 total casualties though about 500 is more common.

enemy casualties typically come from AA, and mine are A2A and AA



Image
Attachments
999.jpg
999.jpg (134.14 KiB) Viewed 202 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Strengths

Post by topeverest »

AS you can see, I have been unable to grind down the enemy effectiveness ratio despite heavy combat.

I am curious if this is normal or it is because I have underperformed.



Image
Attachments
9778.jpg
9778.jpg (303.39 KiB) Viewed 203 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

Production - industry

Post by topeverest »

Here is a view of production - this is all doing satisfactorily



Image
Attachments
44433.jpg
44433.jpg (197.02 KiB) Viewed 202 times
Andy M
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

AFV production

Post by topeverest »

All fine here too



Image
Attachments
444433.jpg
444433.jpg (122.25 KiB) Viewed 202 times
Andy M
charlie0311
Posts: 940
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 11:15 am

RE: AFV production

Post by charlie0311 »

Hi Andy,

Fourteen loaded tank armies is doable. Lots of everything else as well.

C






Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”