The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

The length of this game, like mine, will be determined by the outcome of the first big CV clash. I can see both going into '46.

Especially since Dan cannot bomb John's oil. However, unless John gets a couple of crushing defeats of Dan's fleet, 1946 will be hard to pull off. The Soviet activation really brings the hammer down. Hard to see it lasting more than three or four months after they start hammering-even if the Americans are stalled. Russian OOB in 1945 is just nasty.

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
paullus99
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 10:00 am

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by paullus99 »

I just want to see Canoe kick John's ass.....[:D]
Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by obvert »

x
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by obvert »

posting issues. sorry.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

5/9/43 and 5/10/43

Battle of Sumatra: John and I have worked together (though he doesn't know it) to ensure that the endgame in Sumatra is methodical and therefore slow. After he evicted me from the contested hex, I sent an armored unit back to the hex from adjacent Langsa. It won the race, crossing the hexside before the enemy could and therefore closing off that hexside. Thus John will have to attack before advancing. And it's clear that a land advance is what he's chosen, because there are now seven units in the hex (up from three at the time of the attack). This buys me enough time to get all units out of Langsa. Some via strat movement and some by regular movement. All this means "Fortress Sabang" will be at optimal strength. It has 90k supply, so should last for at least two weeks or maybe longer.

With 8 divisions plus support troops my guess is that Sabang would go significantly over the SL. The conditions would not then be optimal, and instead of slowing his troops on the way with the already doomed and beat up divisions, you'll see their fatigue and disruption grow even in friendly territory. Supply will eat itself, and the base will not last long at all.

SL are best used by maximizing each hex, not stacking it all into one "fortress."It was a big adjustment for me after having to face 500k Allied troops in one hex in my non-SL games as Japan, to which the only answer is to pile up a bunch on the defense. With SL if he comes with too much it'll hurt him too, so you're better off trying to stay under the limits.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by crsutton »

Not all work in this AAR but some play. Here is one for Dan. I have seen Civil War cannon live fire but not ever seen a gun shoot canister. I can't imagine trying to advance in the face of a six gun battery firing this stuff. Not humanly possible. Not for me at least..

https://youtu.be/k86XhYS8GJI
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20313
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Not all work in this AAR but some play. Here is one for Dan. I have seen Civil War cannon live fire but not ever seen a gun shoot canister. I can't imagine trying to advance in the face of a six gun battery firing this stuff. Not humanly possible. Not for me at least..

https://youtu.be/k86XhYS8GJI
Interesting, but my understanding of the terminology is that the little balls that are in the shot are grapeshot or shrapnel, while canister was supposed to be any old metal junk like nuts and bolts stuffed in a canvas bag? At least in naval terminology, since they did not have access to the cardboard to make a rigid canister they used canvas.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by Capt. Harlock »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Not all work in this AAR but some play. Here is one for Dan. I have seen Civil War cannon live fire but not ever seen a gun shoot canister. I can't imagine trying to advance in the face of a six gun battery firing this stuff. Not humanly possible. Not for me at least..

https://youtu.be/k86XhYS8GJI
Interesting, but my understanding of the terminology is that the little balls that are in the shot are grapeshot or shrapnel, while canister was supposed to be any old metal junk like nuts and bolts stuffed in a canvas bag? At least in naval terminology, since they did not have access to the cardboard to make a rigid canister they used canvas.

On land, they actually used "cans", thin metal containers. And it was, to quote Bruce Catton, "in the highest degree murderous". The artillerymen themselves often called it "canned hell-fire".

(Sorry for the thread OT...)

Image
Attachments
Cannister.jpg
Cannister.jpg (60.65 KiB) Viewed 212 times
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: crsutton

Not all work in this AAR but some play. Here is one for Dan. I have seen Civil War cannon live fire but not ever seen a gun shoot canister. I can't imagine trying to advance in the face of a six gun battery firing this stuff. Not humanly possible. Not for me at least..

https://youtu.be/k86XhYS8GJI
Interesting, but my understanding of the terminology is that the little balls that are in the shot are grapeshot or shrapnel, while canister was supposed to be any old metal junk like nuts and bolts stuffed in a canvas bag? At least in naval terminology, since they did not have access to the cardboard to make a rigid canister they used canvas.


Well it sort of has become interchangeable but canister is an official round and does not refer to shoving nails and junk down the barrel. Canister was originally packaged in tin but both the American and Germans use modern canister rounds made specifically as ammo in WWII. Probably some other nationalities as well. Using a smaller round than grape, canister was considered an anti-personnel round. Grape shot, usually packaged in canvass, featured larger heavier balls. It was intended for ship warfare and the heavier rounds were considered better because they could penetrate some wood and tear up rigging as well as being useful vs personnel. But really other than size, the idea is generally the same.


Shrapnel is a solid case shell designed to explode near the enemy and then throw out balls or fragments. Canister and grape operate more like a shotgun blast where there is no secondary explosion within the shell.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20313
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by BBfanboy »

Thanks for the ordnance lessons boys! And now back to our regularly scheduled AAR! [:)]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
desicat
Posts: 542
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 8:10 pm

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by desicat »

Shrapnel is a solid case shell designed to explode near the enemy and then throw out balls or fragments. Canister and grape operate more like a shotgun blast where there is no secondary explosion within the shell.

Shrapnel rounds designed to explode above the ground and shower down upon enemies as a counter to slit trenches.
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by Canoerebel »

5/11/43 and 5/12/43

Battle of Sumatra: On the 11th, the Six Sisters, the Four Kongos, and the Three Brothers (including Yamato) bombard the two bases. I haven't seen KB, but I suspect strongly she's in this region.

I think John is finally coming for Sabang. A very large TF of merchantmen is between Sibolga and Sabang. And Allied sub hit one and caused troop casualties. Too, I got a couple of SigInt hits like 21/15 Div. prepping for Sabang.

His timing is funny. He waited to invade until after he persuade me to retire most of my army from Langsa to Sabang. So he'll catch Sabang at a stronger moment rather than at its weakest. Probably something on the order of 1500 AV. He's going to wrap up the campaign in the not too distant future, but I think not before Circus performs.

Operation Circus: More than 500 ships are at sea now. Still waiting on carriers to perform their maintenance calls - the main thing is topping off fuel and replacing missing aircraft to top off squadrons. The advance merchantmen are roughly 1/3rd of the way to the beachheads now. They'll stop in a few days and await the carriers. Essentially all ships should be at sea in four days. SigInt that a pioneer engineering unit is inbound to Manikowari on New Guinea's northeast coast.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

The length of this game, like mine, will be determined by the outcome of the first big CV clash. I can see both going into '46.

Michael, I will agree to disagree with you on this. We have Jocke vs Obvert where Obvert won the CV clashes and lost the war in July of 1945. Why? Economics was a major part along with Yankees in Korea.

So I will posit that any Japanese player can win the CV clashes and still lose the war well before 1946.
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

The length of this game, like mine, will be determined by the outcome of the first big CV clash. I can see both going into '46.

Michael, I will agree to disagree with you on this. We have Jocke vs Obvert where Obvert won the CV clashes and lost the war in July of 1945. Why? Economics was a major part along with Yankees in Korea.

So I will posit that any Japanese player can win the CV clashes and still lose the war well before 1946.

The other obvious example in my mind is my other long-running PBEM where I lost half the KB on day 2(!!!) and the game is still fun and competitive in mid-43 at least. If the Allies lose CVs there are other methodical methods to move forward. If the Japanese lose CVs they must buckle down and fight defensively earlier, but can push back and remain a threat if the Allies over-reach or become overly confident.

Here in RA with the enhanced defensive units of the Japanese OOB the Japanese should be able to withstand a few setbacks and stay competitive. The CD guns alone mean every invasion will be more hotly contested than in stock, and the better airframes mean air superiority might never go completely to the Allies except in local areas for short duration. See GreyJoy vs Mr Kane for examples of late war fighters with Symon's enhancements causing major problems for the Allies.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by Lowpe »

Often times I think there is too much emphasis put on the decisive battle...which seems to work more on the personal morale check of the players than the actual game situation.

User avatar
PresterJohn001
Posts: 382
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:45 pm

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by PresterJohn001 »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Often times I think there is too much emphasis put on the decisive battle...which seems to work more on the personal morale check of the players than the actual game situation.


Very true :)

Carrier's help with mobility, but its the planes they carry that do the damage...
memento mori
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5244
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by zuluhour »

+1 Obvert
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5244
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by zuluhour »

double post
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by Canoerebel »

5/13/43

Battle of Sumtra: The Japanese stacked advanced to Langsa, but slowly enough that all Allied units left the hex. I'm leaving a blocking position in the jungle, but I might abandon that if John continues to employ the bombardments that mess them up so bad. In that event, the fallback is to get the fighting troops into Sabang, where there is 83k supply and bombardments don't bother them, and to leave most of the support troops out in the jungle (to avoid overstacking). At this point I think the Allies will hold through the end of this month, which is enough (and more than I had expected).

Yamato and friends bombard Langsa.

An enemy amphibious TF drops troops onto the jungle road on the west side far south of Sabang (and behind John's own units). This was an "oops" by him - what I don't know is whether these troops were moving forward to Sabang or whether they had possibly picked up units from the jungle to take elsewhere.

We're at D Plus 184 now. Hard to believe.

Operation Circus: Ships are scurrying around, carriers are scurrying around, things are in the final stages of organization. Point Luck is growing crowded. No helpful SigInt today.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel


Operation Circus: Ships are scurrying around, carriers are scurrying around, things are in the final stages of organization. Point Luck is growing crowded. No helpful SigInt today.

Hungry elephants can be preti nasti. An elephant bit my sister once. Feed the circus elephants or pay the consequences! [8D]
The Moose
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”