OT: Radios

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: OT: Radios

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: zzodr
ORIGINAL: mdiehl


Well, but does it have to? If a solar sail generated some small amount of thrust constantly out to the heliopause, wouldn't the spaceship-beastie be moving pretty fast?

Fast in race car terms, yes, very. Fast as in travelling to another star system? No.
Voyager 1 is now entering this area where the solar energy from our Sun is negligible.

In 100 days a sail could reach 16,000 kilometers per hour (10,000 miles per hour); in one year it could reach 58,000 kilometers per hour (36,000 miles per hour). In just three years, a solar sail could reach a speed of over 160,000 kilometers per hour (100,000 miles per hour). At that speed you could reach Pluto in less than five years. In comparison, the New Horizons misson to Pluto, using chemical propulsion and a gravity-assist from Jupiter, is planned to take nine years to reach its target.

Still, 160,000 kilometers per hour (100,000 miles per hour) is still only 0.00015 the speed of light. It would take about 1,000 years for a solar sail to reach one-tenth the speed of light, even with light shining on it continuously. This emphasizes just how hard interstellar flight is.

http://www.discoversolarenergy.com/solar/sails.htm

I assume you presume the craft begins at rest? That need not be the case. Disposable strap-on engines would work well to boost it to the speeds you end up at, with the sails continuing the acceleration from there.
The Moose
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: OT: Radios

Post by JWE »

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
I assume you presume the craft begins at rest? That need not be the case. Disposable strap-on engines would work well to boost it to the speeds you end up at, with the sails continuing the acceleration from there.
The mass penalties for the fuel are insane, self limiting actually. Assuming even a 1g boost, for any appreciable time sufficient to move zzodr's decimal point even one place to the right, the fuel mass would be rather large. Conservation of momentum. That's why many sci-fi writers assume a Bussard configuration.
User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: OT: Radios

Post by LoBaron »

ORIGINAL: JWE

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
I assume you presume the craft begins at rest? That need not be the case. Disposable strap-on engines would work well to boost it to the speeds you end up at, with the sails continuing the acceleration from there.
The mass penalties for the fuel are insane, self limiting actually. Assuming even a 1g boost, for any appreciable time sufficient to move zzodr's decimal point even one place to the right, the fuel mass would be rather large. Conservation of momentum. That's why many sci-fi writers assume a Bussard configuration.

I always wondered if far in the future a long range continuousely operating engine comparable to scramjets would be able to tap free hydrogen or energies of the vacuum.
Stanislav Lem described such an propulsion method in Fiasko. Is that similar to a Bussard configuration? I think Bussard is a fusion reactor type?
Image
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: OT: Radios

Post by JWE »

ORIGINAL: LoBaron
I always wondered if far in the future a long range continuousely operating engine comparable to scramjets would be able to tap free hydrogen or energies of the vacuum.
Stanislav Lem described such an propulsion method in Fiasko. Is that similar to a Bussard configuration? I think Bussard is a fusion reactor type?
Well ... technically Bussard described a system; sweeping up free hydrogen for compression into a fuel source, which compels a mass reaction converter, the most efficient of which is a fusor (to date).

What the sci-fi people (and others) have done is to promote Bussard to a 'concept'; accessing any energy source, outside the containment environment, as a fuel source. You still need some kind of converter to make them march. Our present physics requires mass reaction, so a fusor is still looking good. No matter the fuel source, mass or energy, it still needs to be converted into a form that is practically useful (given our present physics).
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: OT: Radios

Post by JWE »

The wierd thing is trying to explain physics in words. It's so much easier in math, but then most people haven't learned to speak that language, so Woof !!

It's like trying to explain to an orchestra how to play a Beethoven symphony, when nobody knows how to read music. One can use words, but oh my, the horror , the misunderstandings, and the decades. Just a simple example, and it's on-topic, too (imagine that).

One space ship (traveling E at speed .9c) sends a radio signal to andother space ship (traveling SW at speed .9c). Propagation time of the signal is d'/c. Doppler will have an effect with respect to the receiving ship in so far as her v stretches out (or shortens) the wavelength of the signal. The receiver will get the signal at t'=d'/c but it must be processed to account for v.

Everything that happens, every single little thing the happens, is evaluated on the basis of 2 inertial reference frames - Mr .9c E and Mr .9c SW. An observer who is not aboard either one of the ships can evaluate these things for himself (we have), but the observer must, simply must, be in an inertial reference frame of his own (our's were) that is relative to the two ships. That's why it's called relativity.

There is no such thing as an observer sitting outside the system with stopwatches and such. Being outside the system means solutions are utterly irrelevant. That's one of the many reasons that I and many of my colleagues believe.
User avatar
Kwik E Mart
Posts: 2447
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:42 pm

RE: OT: Radios

Post by Kwik E Mart »

ORIGINAL: JWE

The wierd thing is trying to explain physics in words. It's so much easier in math, but then most people haven't learned to speak that language, so Woof !!

It's like trying to explain to an orchestra how to play a Beethoven symphony, when nobody knows how to read music. One can use words, but oh my, the horror , the misunderstandings, and the decades. Just a simple example, and it's on-topic, too (imagine that).

One space ship (traveling E at speed .9c) sends a radio signal to andother space ship (traveling SW at speed .9c). Propagation time of the signal is d'/c. Doppler will have an effect with respect to the receiving ship in so far as her v stretches out (or shortens) the wavelength of the signal. The receiver will get the signal at t'=d'/c but it must be processed to account for v.

Everything that happens, every single little thing the happens, is evaluated on the basis of 2 inertial reference frames - Mr .9c E and Mr .9c SW. An observer who is not aboard either one of the ships can evaluate these things for himself (we have), but the observer must, simply must, be in an inertial reference frame of his own (our's were) that is relative to the two ships. That's why it's called relativity.

There is no such thing as an observer sitting outside the system with stopwatches and such. Being outside the system means solutions are utterly irrelevant. That's one of the many reasons that I and many of my colleagues believe.

...OMG! it's so much easier to understand once you used math! [:'(]
Kirk Lazarus: I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!
Ron Swanson: Clear alcohols are for rich women on diets.

Image
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: OT: Radios

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: JWE

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
I assume you presume the craft begins at rest? That need not be the case. Disposable strap-on engines would work well to boost it to the speeds you end up at, with the sails continuing the acceleration from there.
The mass penalties for the fuel are insane, self limiting actually. Assuming even a 1g boost, for any appreciable time sufficient to move zzodr's decimal point even one place to the right, the fuel mass would be rather large. Conservation of momentum. That's why many sci-fi writers assume a Bussard configuration.

Sci-fi writers usualy assume that the fuel comes from solar system assets and is not lifted from Earth (unless there's a space elevator [:)]) But his figures state 100 days to reach 10,000 miles per hour. I was not assuming a 1g boost either. In the case of Niven, many of his vehicles are unmanned cargo ships sent to systems already colonized by very large slow-boat sleeper ships which carried their own fuel and were very, very inefficient.

My understanding is that Bussards don't work inside systems very well (too much crud swept up with the hydrogen), but are a great idea in interstellar space.
The Moose
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: OT: Radios

Post by Nikademus »

John, your making my head hurt.

No wonder Roddenberry went for Warp Drive. Easier to technospeak it.

danlongman
Posts: 584
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:36 pm
Location: Over the hills and far away

RE: OT: Radios

Post by danlongman »

Speaking of Rodenberry (or Fontana in this case).......
I am beginning to think relativity theory is a game of "Fizbin" played on us and each other by physicists.
It seems to require some kind of arcane mathematix combined with interpretive dance to comprehend.
Nobody wants to call BS and say they do not understand because that would mean admitting ignorance.
I suspect they just makes it up as they goes along......
cheers
"Patriotism: Your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: OT: Radios

Post by JWE »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus
John, your making my head hurt.

No wonder Roddenberry went for Warp Drive. Easier to technospeak it.
You think so? Just take a peek at Miguel Alcubierre's metric tensor; and the idea of Constant Velocity Bubbles from Brendan McMonigal, Geraint lewis, and Philip O'Byrne; or The Matter of Matter, E. Birkhauser, J. Crayne, and J. Eldredge; and "Mass Denisty Profiles of Stuff", Block/Bosma.

Woof !! It's a wonder Roddenberry's head didn't explode.
User avatar
Kwik E Mart
Posts: 2447
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:42 pm

RE: OT: Radios

Post by Kwik E Mart »

ORIGINAL: JWE

ORIGINAL: Nikademus
John, your making my head hurt.

No wonder Roddenberry went for Warp Drive. Easier to technospeak it.
You think so? Just take a peek at Miguel Alcubierre's metric tensor; and the idea of Constant Velocity Bubbles from Brendan McMonigal, Geraint lewis, and Philip O'Byrne; or The Matter of Matter, E. Birkhauser, J. Crayne, and J. Eldredge; and "Mass Denisty Profiles of Stuff", Block/Bosma.

Woof !! It's a wonder Roddenberry's head didn't explode.

string theory always makes my head hurt...and i majored in physics! [&:]
Kirk Lazarus: I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!
Ron Swanson: Clear alcohols are for rich women on diets.

Image
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: OT: Radios

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: Kwik E Mart
string theory always makes my head hurt...and i majored in physics! [&:]

My total physics training consists of a HS course in 1975. Have they come up with anything new since then?[:'(]

OTOH it was taught by an ex-Phantom squadron commander. So I have THAT going for me.

(My chemistry teacher had been a diesel boat CO. Degrees from USNA, RPI (MS in EE I think), and a Ph.D. in oceanography. He just liked going to school. Not many public HS teachers with those kind of creds.)
The Moose
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: OT: Radios

Post by JWE »

ORIGINAL: Kwik E Mart
string theory always makes my head hurt...and i majored in physics! [&:]
Mine too ... and so did I.

If you really care, I take the Philosophy of Science courses at USC/Arizona every couple years or so. Now I am in Alabama, I'm signed up at UA Huntsville.

These are not your caring and sharing, Govt sponsored, girlie, useless, filosofy courses. These are real courses, taught by real people, who speak math. If you think about it, you can see that the windows and limitations of our understanding are defined by our philosophy. Take a good PoS course and many things will become clear.
User avatar
USSAmerica
Posts: 19211
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:32 am
Location: Graham, NC, USA
Contact:

RE: OT: Radios

Post by USSAmerica »

ORIGINAL: JWE

ORIGINAL: Kwik E Mart
string theory always makes my head hurt...and i majored in physics! [&:]
Mine too ... and so did I.

If you really care, I take the Philosophy of Science courses at USC/Arizona every couple years or so. Now I am in Alabama, I'm signed up at UA Huntsville.

These are not your caring and sharing, Govt sponsored, girlie, useless, filosofy courses. These are real courses, taught by real people, who speak math. If you think about it, you can see that the windows and limitations of our understanding are defined by our philosophy. Take a good PoS course and many things will become clear.

That sounds rather twisted, John, and rather fun! I might have to look for one of those classes when there is once again free time in my life. [8D]
Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me

Image
Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
User avatar
Kwik E Mart
Posts: 2447
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:42 pm

RE: OT: Radios

Post by Kwik E Mart »

ORIGINAL: USS America

ORIGINAL: JWE

ORIGINAL: Kwik E Mart
string theory always makes my head hurt...and i majored in physics! [&:]
Mine too ... and so did I.

If you really care, I take the Philosophy of Science courses at USC/Arizona every couple years or so. Now I am in Alabama, I'm signed up at UA Huntsville.

These are not your caring and sharing, Govt sponsored, girlie, useless, filosofy courses. These are real courses, taught by real people, who speak math. If you think about it, you can see that the windows and limitations of our understanding are defined by our philosophy. Take a good PoS course and many things will become clear.

That sounds rather twisted, John, and rather fun! I might have to look for one of those classes when there is once again free time in my life. [8D]

definitely will look into that...i enjoyed "The Dancing Wu Li Masters" and "Chaos: The Making of a New Science"...alas, my love affair with physics and science in general has taken a back seat to life...[:(]
Kirk Lazarus: I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!
Ron Swanson: Clear alcohols are for rich women on diets.

Image
User avatar
Kwik E Mart
Posts: 2447
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:42 pm

RE: OT: Radios

Post by Kwik E Mart »

ORIGINAL: USS America

ORIGINAL: JWE

ORIGINAL: Kwik E Mart
string theory always makes my head hurt...and i majored in physics! [&:]
Mine too ... and so did I.

If you really care, I take the Philosophy of Science courses at USC/Arizona every couple years or so. Now I am in Alabama, I'm signed up at UA Huntsville.

These are not your caring and sharing, Govt sponsored, girlie, useless, filosofy courses. These are real courses, taught by real people, who speak math. If you think about it, you can see that the windows and limitations of our understanding are defined by our philosophy. Take a good PoS course and many things will become clear.

That sounds rather twisted, John, and rather fun! I might have to look for one of those classes when there is once again free time in my life. [8D]

...and just to point out the obvious, (or not so obvious) the response to the comments on string theory was that it was "twisted" [:D]
Kirk Lazarus: I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!
Ron Swanson: Clear alcohols are for rich women on diets.

Image
Ddog
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:37 am
Location: Cincinnati, OH

RE: OT: Radios

Post by Ddog »

ORIGINAL: wdolson

If you were traveling at the speed of light, time would essentially stop and you would hear nothing. Another way to look at it would be the radio waves would be traveling exactly the same speed you were.

If you were traveling a little less than the speed of light, you would pick up radio, but it would be stuff broadcast after you left (you would be going slower than the radio waves), but it would be dramatically downshifted in frequency to a point where you would probably need a computer to speed it back up again, and collecting an hour's worth of programming would take a few years.

If you were able to exceed the speed of light, with some kind of drive only known to science fiction today, you would outrun the radio and most likely hear nothing while you were traveling, but when you stopped, you would be able to pick up broadcasts from many years ago, depending on how far away you were. The radio waves would also be very diffuse, the strength of the signal declines at the cube of the distance (the signal is radiating out from Earth in a sphere), so you would need a super sophisticated receiver to be able to pick up anything. Radio noise put out by our sun would probably drown out much of the signal after some distance. You might be able to pick up a bit of a radio hot spot where Earth was when the broadcasts you are picking up were sent, but all you would be able to do is pick up that something was transmitted.

SETI tries to pick up coherent radio patterns in signals from other stars. So far they haven't found anything definitive. They do have some pretty sophisticated receiver arrays (and would like to build even more sophisticated arrays). I doubt you'd be able to pick up anything coherent with commercially available equipment even if planets around nearby stars were broadcasting.

And always remember 285,000 miles per second, it's not only a good idea, it's the law. [:D]

Bill




Bill,

I think you may be wrong about the speed of light, but not the radio lol A friend I grew up with (the guy who actually got me playing wargames such as Tobruk, Squad Leader, Luftwaffe, etc.) teaches at the University of Minn. Deluth. He has been working on a project involving neutrinos for about 20 years. If you seen the movie 2012, nuetrinos destroy the earth lol but at least the movie got the reciever deep in the ground in India correct. There are 2 recievers that my freind worked at, one buried deep in the Alps in Italy, and the other deep in some mountain in Japan. Anyway, these neutrinos pass thru the earth and never slow down, so the mountains act as a filter. I was in the Marines, so I won't pretend to know a whole lot about Astrophysics. But last year they fired nuetrinos from from some sort of generator to a receiver and they traveled faster than light. Then there was speculation about if Einstien was correct they would of had to of received the neutrinos before they were fired.

I'll include an article, and you can do your own research if you are interested.....it hurts my brain [&:]

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/30/opini ... das30.html

I'd rather be lucky than good.

User avatar
koniu
Posts: 2763
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:19 pm
Location: Konin, Poland, European Union

RE: OT: Radios

Post by koniu »

ORIGINAL: Ddog

ORIGINAL: wdolson

If you were traveling at the speed of light, time would essentially stop and you would hear nothing. Another way to look at it would be the radio waves would be traveling exactly the same speed you were.

If you were traveling a little less than the speed of light, you would pick up radio, but it would be stuff broadcast after you left (you would be going slower than the radio waves), but it would be dramatically downshifted in frequency to a point where you would probably need a computer to speed it back up again, and collecting an hour's worth of programming would take a few years.

If you were able to exceed the speed of light, with some kind of drive only known to science fiction today, you would outrun the radio and most likely hear nothing while you were traveling, but when you stopped, you would be able to pick up broadcasts from many years ago, depending on how far away you were. The radio waves would also be very diffuse, the strength of the signal declines at the cube of the distance (the signal is radiating out from Earth in a sphere), so you would need a super sophisticated receiver to be able to pick up anything. Radio noise put out by our sun would probably drown out much of the signal after some distance. You might be able to pick up a bit of a radio hot spot where Earth was when the broadcasts you are picking up were sent, but all you would be able to do is pick up that something was transmitted.

SETI tries to pick up coherent radio patterns in signals from other stars. So far they haven't found anything definitive. They do have some pretty sophisticated receiver arrays (and would like to build even more sophisticated arrays). I doubt you'd be able to pick up anything coherent with commercially available equipment even if planets around nearby stars were broadcasting.

And always remember 285,000 miles per second, it's not only a good idea, it's the law. [:D]

Bill




Bill,

I think you may be wrong about the speed of light, but not the radio lol A friend I grew up with (the guy who actually got me playing wargames such as Tobruk, Squad Leader, Luftwaffe, etc.) teaches at the University of Minn. Deluth. He has been working on a project involving neutrinos for about 20 years. If you seen the movie 2012, nuetrinos destroy the earth lol but at least the movie got the reciever deep in the ground in India correct. There are 2 recievers that my freind worked at, one buried deep in the Alps in Italy, and the other deep in some mountain in Japan. Anyway, these neutrinos pass thru the earth and never slow down, so the mountains act as a filter. I was in the Marines, so I won't pretend to know a whole lot about Astrophysics. But last year they fired nuetrinos from from some sort of generator to a receiver and they traveled faster than light. Then there was speculation about if Einstien was correct they would of had to of received the neutrinos before they were fired.

I'll include an article, and you can do your own research if you are interested.....it hurts my brain [&:]

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/30/opini ... das30.html

I must find source of that but i hear in TV that after they check everything again they found some kind on technical multifunction and neutrinos where traveling with speed of light. It was lose cable or something like that.:)

EDIT. It was lose cable between computer and GPS module used to measure travel time of neutrinos between point A and B.
They suspecting also that synchronization between computers where corrupted

"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7678
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: OT: Radios

Post by wdolson »

CERN did find some results that may have been an indication of a particle traveling faster than light, but the results are still being interpreted. It's been the buzz in the world of Physics lately.

Bill
SCW Development Team
Ddog
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:37 am
Location: Cincinnati, OH

RE: OT: Radios

Post by Ddog »

ORIGINAL: koniu
ORIGINAL: Ddog

ORIGINAL: wdolson

If you were traveling at the speed of light, time would essentially stop and you would hear nothing. Another way to look at it would be the radio waves would be traveling exactly the same speed you were.

If you were traveling a little less than the speed of light, you would pick up radio, but it would be stuff broadcast after you left (you would be going slower than the radio waves), but it would be dramatically downshifted in frequency to a point where you would probably need a computer to speed it back up again, and collecting an hour's worth of programming would take a few years.

If you were able to exceed the speed of light, with some kind of drive only known to science fiction today, you would outrun the radio and most likely hear nothing while you were traveling, but when you stopped, you would be able to pick up broadcasts from many years ago, depending on how far away you were. The radio waves would also be very diffuse, the strength of the signal declines at the cube of the distance (the signal is radiating out from Earth in a sphere), so you would need a super sophisticated receiver to be able to pick up anything. Radio noise put out by our sun would probably drown out much of the signal after some distance. You might be able to pick up a bit of a radio hot spot where Earth was when the broadcasts you are picking up were sent, but all you would be able to do is pick up that something was transmitted.

SETI tries to pick up coherent radio patterns in signals from other stars. So far they haven't found anything definitive. They do have some pretty sophisticated receiver arrays (and would like to build even more sophisticated arrays). I doubt you'd be able to pick up anything coherent with commercially available equipment even if planets around nearby stars were broadcasting.

And always remember 285,000 miles per second, it's not only a good idea, it's the law. [:D]

Bill




Bill,

I think you may be wrong about the speed of light, but not the radio lol A friend I grew up with (the guy who actually got me playing wargames such as Tobruk, Squad Leader, Luftwaffe, etc.) teaches at the University of Minn. Deluth. He has been working on a project involving neutrinos for about 20 years. If you seen the movie 2012, nuetrinos destroy the earth lol but at least the movie got the reciever deep in the ground in India correct. There are 2 recievers that my freind worked at, one buried deep in the Alps in Italy, and the other deep in some mountain in Japan. Anyway, these neutrinos pass thru the earth and never slow down, so the mountains act as a filter. I was in the Marines, so I won't pretend to know a whole lot about Astrophysics. But last year they fired nuetrinos from from some sort of generator to a receiver and they traveled faster than light. Then there was speculation about if Einstien was correct they would of had to of received the neutrinos before they were fired.

I'll include an article, and you can do your own research if you are interested.....it hurts my brain [&:]

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/30/opini ... das30.html

I must find source of that but i hear in TV that after they check everything again they found some kind on technical multifunction and neutrinos where traveling with speed of light. It was lose cable or something like that.:)

EDIT. It was lose cable between computer and GPS module used to measure travel time of neutrinos between point A and B.
They suspecting also that synchronization between computers where corrupted



It's been awhile since I talked to him, so I'll put out an email and see if I can get any scuttlebutt on the issue. :)

Cheers
I'd rather be lucky than good.

Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”