ORIGINAL: HansBolter
I'm sufficiently disgusted now so you needn't worry about anymore posts from me here today.
Whee.
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
Post by Bullwinkle58 »
ORIGINAL: HansBolter
I'm sufficiently disgusted now so you needn't worry about anymore posts from me here today.
ORIGINAL: HansBolter
Guys we all know the 'bonus" is the difference in training.
Did you all really feel it necessary to pile on with the extremist expressions of disdain and jubilation in proving yet another newbie wrong in his impressions?
This is the kind of behavior that makes it hard to accept your arguments that the Japanese side truly needs all of the beefing up it was given to make the side viable to play and appealing to players.
Gloating isn't a becoming character trait for anyone.
I'm sufficiently disgusted now so you needn't worry about anymore posts from me here today.
Post by CyrusSpitama »
ORIGINAL: CyrusSpitama
Based on suggestions from several AARs and forum posts, I have dropped all the 2nd squadrons off my cruisers to stock more Jakes around my frontlines/key bases(as Japan). I have rarely done anything other than trained them for naval search except for the rare CV escort FPs that will get some ASW training. It has never really occurred to me that the Jakes were worthy enough to be used as bombers of any kind except for the previously mentioned ASW, which mostly seems to deter and not sink.
Based on my comment above, is naval search indeed ample for detecting and deterring sub contacts as well as best usage for all these *new* Jake squadrons? Should I be diversifying my Jake training ?
Edit: as an additional question. The Kates can carry the 800kg bomb once they get 80 experience, correct?
Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”