Why was Patton so great?

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

User avatar
Von Rom
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by Von Rom »

ORIGINAL: IronDuke

Golf, Jallatryne,

After the frustrating experience I've had in this thread trying to get a straight debate, you will never know how much your comments are a lift to me. You wonder (in situations like this) whether anyone is noticing what you are saying when it is consistently ignored, and then wonder if it is missed when it is followed by the same stuff repeated over and over again as if it is an answer, without a thought for analysis, or any of the other things I thought good debate should have. Thank you for your comments, they are appreciated.

Golf,
I've started up the Monty thread, I seem to remember reading in the HTTR forum (I have HTTR and AA)that the engine was going to Normandy after the Aegean expansion, so I'm sure we can broaden the discussion to discuss the campaign as a whole if you're doing a little prep ahead of all that and have some opinions. One of the scenarios I've designed for Battlefields is Operation Epsom, but the campaign as a whole has always been a favourite (not least because the Wife's late Grandfather came ashore at D + 45 mins on Gold beach - Jig Green West.)

Cheers,
IronDuke


Please. . .

This is embarrassing. . . [8|]

Hopefully, you won't be out to destroy Monty's good name, as you were trying to do with Patton. . .
User avatar
Von Rom
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by Von Rom »

I am also done with this thread. . .

It has been a very enlightening experience, in more ways than one.

Yes, this whole exercise has been a real eye-opener. . .

I now know why General Patton wanted to be buried in Europe among the fallen soldiers of his beloved Third Army. . .

Adieu...
EricGuitarJames
Posts: 498
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 12:02 am
Location: Not far enough away for some!
Contact:

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by EricGuitarJames »

ORIGINAL: Von Rom


Hopefully, you won't be out to destroy Monty's good name, as you were trying to do with Patton. . .

Despite bailing out in utter frustration it's been an experience reading through this.

Von Rom, if you read this, nobody has tried to destroy Patton's 'good name'. Everyone believes that Patton was a good general but some doubt he qualifies for greatness, it's a question of degrees and perspective that's all. I feel that your 'love' for Patton borders on the religious and this zeal seems to blind you to what the likes of Iron Duke, Kevinugly and Golf actually say.
It's Just a Ride!
Kevinugly
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 12:44 am
Location: Colchester, UK
Contact:

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by Kevinugly »

ORIGINAL: Von Rom
ORIGINAL: Kevinugly

Von Rom wrote (of me)
Yet, you feel you must step in for him, even though the Lorraine campaign was between him and I.

I don't blame you though, his argument was sinking fast.


I don't see how you can say that since you haven't addressed the conclusions of the study that I posted. I will summarise (rather than reprint) these conclusions.

1) Patton failed to practice economy of force in both the September assault on Nancy by XII corps and the November assault on Metz by XX Corps.

2) Patton 'parceled out' his armour in small 'penny packets' rather than concentrating them for a decisive push as the German commanders in Lorraine feared he would.

3) By taking logistical shortcuts to maintain the advance in late August in neglecting the need for ammunition in favour of petrol he contributed heavily to his own logistics problems in the Lorraine campaign. This from a man quoted as saying - "Gentlemen, the officer who doesn't know his communications and supply as well as his tactics is totally useless."

Von Rom, you should either address these conclusions directly and in detail or you should fold. We are not dealing with the fictions of 'what if', we are dealing with what actually happened - Pattons command decisions. I will check in regularly to see whether you have taken the time to deal with this.

Kevinugly:

You don't have a leg to stand on even when it comes to the Lorraine Campaign. Not one.

You and Patton's other critics can't even fault Patton at Metz. . .

Why?

Read on:

General Patton Won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army was short of supplies:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had no intelligence:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had little gas:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had very little ammo:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had HALF its soldiers removed before battle:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had HALF its airforce removed before battle:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had to fight in torrential rains:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army suffered 18,000 cases of Trench Foot:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army was counterattacked by Tigers and Panthers:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had to assault the most heavily fortified place in Europe:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even with all this against him, General Patton STILL Won the Lorraine Campaign


Are you going to fold?


Still doesn't deal with the points made. It's not about 'winning' or 'losing' but with the proper application of force. Patton made a hash of the Lorraine campaign and thousands of brave American soldiers needlessly lost their lives because of his incompetance and arrogance.
GENERAL PATTON NEVER LOST A CAMPAIGN


ID has already posted a list of WW2 commanders who also never lost a campaign but if you want to rate Patton alongside a dolt like Mark Clark then be my guest.

I'd also point out that Pattons hero was Hannibal, a commander who never actually won a campaign, was decisively beaten by Scipio at Zama and ended his life by commiting suicide whilst on the run from the Romans. Nevertheless, he is still held up as a military genius. Another great commander is Robert E. Lee yet he was defeated in several campaigns before ignominiously surrendering at Appomattox. Yet by your standard, these commanders would be held up as total failures! I hope this illustrates how absurd your position is.
Thankyou for using the World Wide Web. British designed, given freely to the World.
User avatar
Von Rom
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by Von Rom »

ORIGINAL: EricGuitarJames
ORIGINAL: Von Rom


Hopefully, you won't be out to destroy Monty's good name, as you were trying to do with Patton. . .

Despite bailing out in utter frustration it's been an experience reading through this.

Von Rom, if you read this, nobody has tried to destroy Patton's 'good name'. Everyone believes that Patton was a good general but some doubt he qualifies for greatness, it's a question of degrees and perspective that's all. I feel that your 'love' for Patton borders on the religious and this zeal seems to blind you to what the likes of Iron Duke, Kevinugly and Golf actually say.

Heheh

Not out to destroy Patton's name?

Heheh

A question of degrees?

Heheh

That's right - attack MY character now.

Heheh

I was the only person willing to stand up to the Patton bashing. And that is ALL it was.

I know Patton wasn't wasn't perfect; he had flaws.

He knew that himself - but all he wanted to do was fight. And he proved he could fight.

History and his achievements bear witness to his acts far better than I ever can.

However, NOTHING Patton did - was good enough - especially for the Patton bashers in this thread.

Get it?

I make no apologies for standing up for his good name.

Example:

People bash Patton over his attacking Metz. Why, they exclaim would he attack Metz?

The simple answer is - that Metz was the KEY to the entire Moselle Front, because of its road and rail networks. The heavy rains in Lorraine in the fall, plus the fields, trees and hills all dictated the fact that those roads were absolutely vital for any movement through Lorraine.

Yet, I'll bet not a single Patton basher knew that.

Even with half of Third Army and half of his airforce removed, even with little gas and few supplies, and even with the beavy rains, Patton STILL won at Lorraine.

Even though almost eveything was done to try to ensure Patton's defeat in Lorraine, he still achieved victory.

Yet, the Patton bashers simply turn up their noses and say, "yes, yes", but what of the "degree" of victory. . .

They say, "True, Patton took Nancy; true he took Metz; true his troops fought in appalling conditions; true the 4th armoured division fought off several panzer counterattacks of Tiger and Panther tanks; but what we really want to know is - how many engineers does it really take to set-up a pontoon bridge? What we really want to know is how many bullets did the German soldier in the Metz fortress really have?"

Get it?

No evidence is good enough for the Patton bashers.

In fact, they are so determined to destroy Patton's name, that it really borders on the pathological.

Even many of the most recent comments by people are simply appalling, especially about Patton's prayer to his troops.

Simply appalling.

I would have to say that the SAME people here who bash Patton are really a congregation of over-zealous Patton bashers, chanting the same slogans; chanting the same character assassinations, and are the true religious fanatics. Did you know that religious fanatics travelled in packs? It's true - they hunt down and kill the unbelieving - the lone voice who won't submit.

And afterwards? They all pat themselves on the back for a job well done - for silencing another independent voice. . .
User avatar
Von Rom
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by Von Rom »

ORIGINAL: Kevinugly
ORIGINAL: Von Rom
ORIGINAL: Kevinugly

Von Rom wrote (of me)



I don't see how you can say that since you haven't addressed the conclusions of the study that I posted. I will summarise (rather than reprint) these conclusions.

1) Patton failed to practice economy of force in both the September assault on Nancy by XII corps and the November assault on Metz by XX Corps.

2) Patton 'parceled out' his armour in small 'penny packets' rather than concentrating them for a decisive push as the German commanders in Lorraine feared he would.

3) By taking logistical shortcuts to maintain the advance in late August in neglecting the need for ammunition in favour of petrol he contributed heavily to his own logistics problems in the Lorraine campaign. This from a man quoted as saying - "Gentlemen, the officer who doesn't know his communications and supply as well as his tactics is totally useless."

Von Rom, you should either address these conclusions directly and in detail or you should fold. We are not dealing with the fictions of 'what if', we are dealing with what actually happened - Pattons command decisions. I will check in regularly to see whether you have taken the time to deal with this.

Kevinugly:

You don't have a leg to stand on even when it comes to the Lorraine Campaign. Not one.

You and Patton's other critics can't even fault Patton at Metz. . .

Why?

Read on:

General Patton Won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army was short of supplies:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had no intelligence:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had little gas:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had very little ammo:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had HALF its soldiers removed before battle:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had HALF its airforce removed before battle:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had to fight in torrential rains:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army suffered 18,000 cases of Trench Foot:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army was counterattacked by Tigers and Panthers:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even when Third Army had to assault the most heavily fortified place in Europe:
General Patton STILL beat the Germans and won the Lorraine Campaign

Even with all this against him, General Patton STILL Won the Lorraine Campaign


Are you going to fold?


Still doesn't deal with the points made. It's not about 'winning' or 'losing' but with the proper application of force. Patton made a hash of the Lorraine campaign and thousands of brave American soldiers needlessly lost their lives because of his incompetance and arrogance.
GENERAL PATTON NEVER LOST A CAMPAIGN


ID has already posted a list of WW2 commanders who also never lost a campaign but if you want to rate Patton alongside a dolt like Mark Clark then be my guest.

I'd also point out that Pattons hero was Hannibal, a commander who never actually won a campaign, was decisively beaten by Scipio at Zama and ended his life by commiting suicide whilst on the run from the Romans. Nevertheless, he is still held up as a military genius. Another great commander is Robert E. Lee yet he was defeated in several campaigns before ignominiously surrendering at Appomattox. Yet by your standard, these commanders would be held up as total failures! I hope this illustrates how absurd your position is.

It's not about 'winning' or 'losing' but with the proper application of force. Patton made a hash of the Lorraine campaign and thousands of brave American soldiers needlessly lost their lives because of his incompetance and arrogance.


Well, well Kevinugly. . .

You rise and make another appearance.

Thoughtful as ever in your analysis.

I am so glad you are not a Patton basher - and are sticking to just the facts [8|]
User avatar
riverbravo
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 10:25 am
Location: Bay St Louis Ms.

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by riverbravo »

ORIGINAL: Von Rom


No evidence is good enough for the Patton bashers.

In fact, they are so determined to destroy Patton's name, that it really borders on the pathological.

Even many of the most recent comments by people are simply appalling, especially about Patton's prayer to his troops.

Simply appalling.

I would have to say that the SAME people here who bash Patton are really a congregation of over-zealous Patton bashers, chanting the same slogans; chanting the same character assassinations, and are the true religious fanatics. Did you know that religious fanatics travelled in packs? It's true - they hunt down and kill the unbelieving - the lone voice who won't submit.

And afterwards? They all pat themselves on the back for a job well done - for silencing another independent voice. . .

Wow...Pretty heavy one man crusade for patton you got going on there Von Rom!

Have you designed youre own tank uniforms too[;)]

Patton will/is a "hall of fame" General,at least he will be in the US.

Patton did some great things but he also had his own demons.I would say fanatacism would be one of them.His own fanatacism and "its my way or the hi-way" attitude knocked hiself out of the battle.Did he think he was above the standard for the code by wich military commanders must abide by?

Another demon of Patton's was his unquenchable thirst for glory.Well,how noble of him to want to be buried with his boys."His boys" the boys that died for good ole "blood and guts".Im sure they were more than happy to pay the price so patton could get his name spread around.

Patton was a great general,I prefer him to Monty,his nemisis,so to speak.You could also argue that patton did more damage than good buy having to be disciplined and "sit out" for a while.A lot of good it does to have youre top armor commander doing PR work and making apoligy speeches.

Perhaps Patton should have looked to his one time subordinate for inspiration and how to conduct himself.....Bradley.
I laugh at hurricanes!
User avatar
Von Rom
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by Von Rom »

ORIGINAL: riverbravo
ORIGINAL: Von Rom


No evidence is good enough for the Patton bashers.

In fact, they are so determined to destroy Patton's name, that it really borders on the pathological.

Even many of the most recent comments by people are simply appalling, especially about Patton's prayer to his troops.

Simply appalling.

I would have to say that the SAME people here who bash Patton are really a congregation of over-zealous Patton bashers, chanting the same slogans; chanting the same character assassinations, and are the true religious fanatics. Did you know that religious fanatics travelled in packs? It's true - they hunt down and kill the unbelieving - the lone voice who won't submit.

And afterwards? They all pat themselves on the back for a job well done - for silencing another independent voice. . .

Wow...Pretty heavy one man crusade for patton you got going on there Von Rom!

Have you designed youre own tank uniforms too[;)]

Patton will/is a "hall of fame" General,at least he will be in the US.

Patton did some great things but he also had his own demons.I would say fanatacism would be one of them.His own fanatacism and "its my way or the hi-way" attitude knocked hiself out of the battle.Did he think he was above the standard for the code by wich military commanders must abide by?

Another demon of Patton's was his unquenchable thirst for glory.Well,how noble of him to want to be buried with his boys."His boys" the boys that died for good ole "blood and guts".Im sure they were more than happy to pay the price so patton could get his name spread around.

Patton was a great general,I prefer him to Monty,his nemisis,so to speak.You could also argue that patton did more damage than good buy having to be disciplined and "sit out" for a while.A lot of good it does to have youre top armor commander doing PR work and making apoligy speeches.

Perhaps Patton should have looked to his one time subordinate for inspiration and how to conduct himself.....Bradley.

Well, riverbravo, welcome:

Well, with all the Patton bashing, someone has to give voice to other views.

It seems to be the same handful of people who bash Patton.
Patton did some great things but he also had his own demons.I would say fanatacism would be one of them.His own fanatacism and "its my way or the hi-way" attitude knocked hiself out of the battle.Did he think he was above the standard for the code by wich military commanders must abide by?

Give me ONE example.
Another demon of Patton's was his unquenchable thirst for glory.Well,how noble of him to want to be buried with his boys."His boys" the boys that died for good ole "blood and guts".Im sure they were more than happy to pay the price so patton could get his name spread around


Give me ONE example.
Patton was a great general,I prefer him to Monty,his nemisis,so to speak

Agreed.
You could also argue that patton did more damage than good buy having to be disciplined and "sit out" for a while.A lot of good it does to have youre top armor commander doing PR work and making apoligy speeches.

I guess you mean the slapping incidents.

As Patton said: "What is a little slap, compared to men dying in battle?"

When Bradley first got the report of it, he considered it so inconsequential that he filed it away.

It was not until THREE MONTHS later that a reporter by the name of Drew Pearson, got hold of this info, and decided to embark on a campaign to drag Patton's name through the mud.

D'Este, in "Patton: A Genius For War" mentions that "there is certainly sufficient evidence to conclude that there were a handful of anti-Patton journalists who sought (and on September 22, 1945, found) a means to either demean (or, better yet, destroy) Patton. . ." (p.766).

It seems that some journalists and some papers in the US were out to destroy Patton even for the slightest things he did.

People should ask themselves:

Why were a handful of newspapers and journalists out to destroy Patton? Who owned those newspapers and why would they allow journalists to attack Patton, even with little or no evidence to support those attacks?

Even the Germans couldn't understand why the Allies' BEST general was removed from command because of a slapping.

D'Este (on page 545) mentions that the Germans were perplexed "over what the fuss was all about. In the German army it was not unusual for a soldier accused of malingering or cowardice to be summarily shot without recourse or trial. Why, they wondered, when success in battle was far more important than personal deportment, would the Americans even consider jeopardizing their own effort by punishing their most 'thrustful' leader?"

While I don't agree with the slapping, it has to be placed in perspective of war. As Patton, himself, mentioned, he was only trying to restore in that man some measure of self respect. The soldier himself, believed that he deserved that slapping and did NOT believe Patton owed him an apology.

What is not shown in the movie "Patton" is that Third Army would not allow Patton to apologize to them. When Patton went to make the apology, his soldiers cheered him so loudly, his words could not be heard. They shouted: "No General. No, No, No. . ."

Patton then broke down and wept.

Although, his superiors punished Patton; it was in fact the Allied war effort that was punished by having Patton sit out of the war for nine months, rather than in leading armies.

Patton would have been quite effective at Anzio if he had been there commanding the breakout.

Yet, what the Germans couldn't do to Patton - stop him - the Allied High Command, and handful of reporters, did do.
Perhaps Patton should have looked to his one time subordinate for inspiration and how to conduct himself.....Bradley

Bradley was a good, solid general; Patton was a prima donna; a show off.

But behind that bluster was action - and Patton proved by his actions he was a fighter.

Bradley, on the other hand, was a bit too timid, especially at Falaise. Later, he admitted not closing the Gap was a mistake.

Patton knew that in battle timidity cost men their lives. Many of the soldiers who escaped from Falaise would later turn up to fight in the Bulge and at Lorriane.

Interestingly, by the time the Lorraine Campaign rolled around, Bradley was coming around to Patton's views and argued with Ike to allow 1st and 3rd armies to punch through the German lines and push for Germany.

Ike refused.

Bradley also sided with Patton in the Bulge against Ike and Monty.
IronDuke_slith
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by IronDuke_slith »

I would have to say that the SAME people here who bash Patton are really a congregation of over-zealous Patton bashers, chanting the same slogans; chanting the same character assassinations, and are the true religious fanatics. Did you know that religious fanatics travelled in packs? It's true - they hunt down and kill the unbelieving - the lone voice who won't submit.

RiverBravo:
Our side of the argument don't quote prayers, carry signed photos, pictures of helmets and hallowed poetic words from the Morrocans. I appreciate your input, but this thread got mystical a page or so ago when it was pointed out Patton decorated his chaplain when the weather turned during the Bulge. It's not a place of rationality anymore.
And afterwards? They all pat themselves on the back for a job well done - for silencing another independent voice. . .

We do not share a definition of independent as this person. This is an opinion. Please judge for yourself, Friend. That said, I can appreciate there's an awful lot here, and I wouldn't relish the job of looking through it.
It seems to be the same handful of people who bash Patton.


It's an ever increasing band, although there's only one who defends him. It kinda suggests people's reading of the evidence brings them down against him at times. I'd be interested to hear which of the evidence presented you've found most compelling (as opposed to what you already believed when you arrived here).

Patton did some great things but he also had his own demons.I would say fanatacism would be one of them.His own fanatacism and "its my way or the hi-way" attitude knocked hiself out of the battle.Did he think he was above the standard for the code by wich military commanders must abide by?
Von Rom: Give me ONE example.

RiverBravo I'd cite:
Hammelburg. 304 Americans sent on a dangerous mission behind enemy lines because Patton believed (or suspected) that a family relative was incarcerated there. The Task force was cut to pieces. No other Military Leader during WWII used his nation's troops for a mission driven out of self interest like this. It clearly demonstrates he felt he was above the standard other Commanders abided by. (Actually, that might not strictly be true, some AXIS Leaders did use troops for their own ends, so I'll qualify it. No other Allied General did.)

Riverbravo: Another demon of Patton's was his unquenchable thirst for glory.Well,how noble of him to want to be buried with his boys."His boys" the boys that died for good ole "blood and guts".Im sure they were more than happy to pay the price so patton could get his name spread around
Von Rom: Give me ONE example.

RiverBravo: I'd cite Metz. D'Este illustrates how as the height of the attacks, with casualties mounting, Patton was urging people on because he wanted to present the city to Marshall during his forthcoming visit to 3rd Army. Launching attacks in order to present the head of the army with a present sounds like glory hunting to me.

If you want a second example, try Palermo. Strategically pointless drive to catch the headlines. To be fair to Patton, he wasn't the only offender. Monty had his moments, and neither Patton nor Monty ever did anything like Clark did in Rome, so it has to be placed in perspective. I don't necessarily think it's a bad thing either, provided you never lose sight of military objectivity when chasing the glory. I'm afraid I felt the above examples show Patton did.

Regards,
Ironduke
IronDuke_slith
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by IronDuke_slith »

Another demon of Patton's was his unquenchable thirst for glory.Well,how noble of him to want to be buried with his boys."His boys" the boys that died for good ole "blood and guts".Im sure they were more than happy to pay the price so patton could get his name spread around.

Riverbravo,
I seem to remember somewhere reading that the men of third army twisted this and used to say "Our Blood, his guts". Know anything about this? I've been searching for the reference, but not traced it yet.
I think I know where I read it, but it'll take a little time to find because it isn't the sort of thing that gets into the index. It's interesting because it suggests a certain cynicism.

Regards,
IronDuke
User avatar
Von Rom
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by Von Rom »

ORIGINAL: IronDuke
I would have to say that the SAME people here who bash Patton are really a congregation of over-zealous Patton bashers, chanting the same slogans; chanting the same character assassinations, and are the true religious fanatics. Did you know that religious fanatics travelled in packs? It's true - they hunt down and kill the unbelieving - the lone voice who won't submit.

RiverBravo:
Our side of the argument don't quote prayers, carry signed photos, pictures of helmets and hallowed poetic words from the Morrocans. I appreciate your input, but this thread got mystical a page or so ago when it was pointed out Patton decorated his chaplain when the weather turned during the Bulge. It's not a place of rationality anymore.
And afterwards? They all pat themselves on the back for a job well done - for silencing another independent voice. . .

We do not share a definition of independent as this person. This is an opinion. Please judge for yourself, Friend. That said, I can appreciate there's an awful lot here, and I wouldn't relish the job of looking through it.
It seems to be the same handful of people who bash Patton.


It's an ever increasing band, although there's only one who defends him. It kinda suggests people's reading of the evidence brings them down against him at times. I'd be interested to hear which of the evidence presented you've found most compelling (as opposed to what you already believed when you arrived here).

Patton did some great things but he also had his own demons.I would say fanatacism would be one of them.His own fanatacism and "its my way or the hi-way" attitude knocked hiself out of the battle.Did he think he was above the standard for the code by wich military commanders must abide by?
Von Rom: Give me ONE example.

RiverBravo I'd cite:
Hammelburg. 304 Americans sent on a dangerous mission behind enemy lines because Patton believed (or suspected) that a family relative was incarcerated there. The Task force was cut to pieces. No other Military Leader during WWII used his nation's troops for a mission driven out of self interest like this. It clearly demonstrates he felt he was above the standard other Commanders abided by. (Actually, that might not strictly be true, some AXIS Leaders did use troops for their own ends, so I'll qualify it. No other Allied General did.)

Riverbravo: Another demon of Patton's was his unquenchable thirst for glory.Well,how noble of him to want to be buried with his boys."His boys" the boys that died for good ole "blood and guts".Im sure they were more than happy to pay the price so patton could get his name spread around
Von Rom: Give me ONE example.

RiverBravo: I'd cite Metz. D'Este illustrates how as the height of the attacks, with casualties mounting, Patton was urging people on because he wanted to present the city to Marshall during his forthcoming visit to 3rd Army. Launching attacks in order to present the head of the army with a present sounds like glory hunting to me.

If you want a second example, try Palermo. Strategically pointless drive to catch the headlines. To be fair to Patton, he wasn't the only offender. Monty had his moments, and neither Patton nor Monty ever did anything like Clark did in Rome, so it has to be placed in perspective. I don't necessarily think it's a bad thing either, provided you never lose sight of military objectivity when chasing the glory. I'm afraid I felt the above examples show Patton did.

Regards,
Ironduke


Ironduke:

Not enough action in your Monty thread?

Or is it too boring with all the fanboys agreeing on bashing Monty?

It seems the same handful of people who bashed Patton are now bashing Monty. . .

It is true that "religious fanatics" travel in packs, seeking whom they may devour. . .

I posted Patton's picture so your "Congregation of Patton Bashers" could see on a daily basis who you were bashing. And that you could see how respected Patton was by the Moroccan Gov't.

Heheh

I didn't think that you or any of your fanboys would have a clue as to why I posted Patton's picture in my signature.

As to displaying Patton's picture in my signature:

It's an old legal stratagem: Display a victim's picture in front of the victim's accusers. . .


As usual, your analysis is so one-sided as to be laughable. . .

But please don't let the facts get in the way of your over-zealous opinions. . .
User avatar
riverbravo
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 10:25 am
Location: Bay St Louis Ms.

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by riverbravo »

Do you think Patton really would have driven so hard to palermo if he didnt think it would gain some fame and kick a bit of dirt on Monty?

Friendly rivalry is one thing but other peoples lives are at stake.

The slapping incident....yes..Did he not have the sense to just walk away.Have an underling punish the coward,put him in a mess unit...whatever...Just slap some sense into him,that'll do it.Was he so caught up in himself and thought everyone feared him so much that somebody wouldnt tell?He mite have had his boys scared of him but the people he crossed outside of his unit were probably waiting for a shot.Once again his hot-head gets him trouble.You cant blame the crap-diggers for digging things up that are true.

The chaplain thing,well....whatever he choses to do.He is in command.IMO,bad move,a strike against him for a borderline loon call on that one.Was the chaplain a relative?

I had heard something about him using troops for some kind of personal deal with family.I dont know specifics and will have to look into it.If in fact true thats way outta line.

Also,the signed card thing,that seems a bit like the german fighter aces anf their cards....once again ...glory seeking.

Patton wanted to fight and wanted glory ....fine,no problem with that but glory finds you,you dont seek it.

The blood and guts thing.Another of pattons nicknames that was twisted by the troops to a more fitting slogan to better show his glorious ways.

Patton overall was a good General and the only one that really scared the Germans.Unfortunatly Pattons legacy will be tarnished by the things he did on and off the battlefield and things that were completely his doing.All the bad press Patton got he called down on himself.

Like all good Generals, a controversial figure to say the least.
I laugh at hurricanes!
IronDuke_slith
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by IronDuke_slith »

Ironduke:

Not enough action in your Monty thread?

Or is it too boring with all the fanboys agreeing on bashing Monty?

It seems the same handful of people who bashed Patton are now bashing Monty. . .

It is true that "religious fanatics" travel in packs, seeking whom they may devour. . .

I posted Patton's picture so your "Congregation of Patton Bashers" could see on a daily basis who you were bashing. And that you could see how respected Patton was by the Moroccan Gov't.

This is paranoia, I don't know anything about this so will refrain from comment. I would say why didn't you tell us the Morroccan Government liked him, I would have refrained from posting over 19 pages had I know this. [8|]
Heheh

I didn't think that you or any of your fanboys would have a clue as to why I posted Patton's picture in my signature.

As to displaying Patton's picture in my signature:

It's an old legal stratagem: Display a victim's picture in front of the victim's accusers. . .


As usual, your analysis is so one-sided as to be laughable. . .

But please don't let the facts get in the way of your over-zealous opinions. . .

It's also an old legal strategm to ignore uncomfortable arguments you can't answer by saying "This argument is so silly, I can't be bothered to answer." I've answered all of your posts, even where they were quite clearly nonsense. It's another strategm to claim the other side have no facts, when that is all they have presented. If the Hammelburg raid did not take place, tell the world. If I am proved wrong, I will apologise publicly. Otherwise, this is dodging the issue. The sign of a bankrupt argument, unfortunately.

IronDuke
IronDuke_slith
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by IronDuke_slith »

ORIGINAL: riverbravo

Do you think Patton really would have driven so hard to palermo if he didnt think it would gain some fame and kick a bit of dirt on Monty?

Friendly rivalry is one thing but other peoples lives are at stake.

The slapping incident....yes..Did he not have the sense to just walk away.Have an underling punish the coward,put him in a mess unit...whatever...Just slap some sense into him,that'll do it.Was he so caught up in himself and thought everyone feared him so much that somebody wouldnt tell?He mite have had his boys scared of him but the people he crossed outside of his unit were probably waiting for a shot.Once again his hot-head gets him trouble.You cant blame the crap-diggers for digging things up that are true.

The chaplain thing,well....whatever he choses to do.He is in command.IMO,bad move,a strike against him for a borderline loon call on that one.Was the chaplain a relative?

I had heard something about him using troops for some kind of personal deal with family.I dont know specifics and will have to look into it.If in fact true thats way outta line.

Also,the signed card thing,that seems a bit like the german fighter aces anf their cards....once again ...glory seeking.

Patton wanted to fight and wanted glory ....fine,no problem with that but glory finds you,you dont seek it.

The blood and guts thing.Another of pattons nicknames that was twisted by the troops to a more fitting slogan to better show his glorious ways.

Patton overall was a good General and the only one that really scared the Germans.Unfortunatly Pattons legacy will be tarnished by the things he did on and off the battlefield and things that were completely his doing.All the bad press Patton got he called down on himself.

Like all good Generals, a controversial figure to say the least.

It's usually referred to as the Hammelburg incident. Towards the bottom of page 19 of this thread, I have written about the incident. Most of what I have written is quoted from history books, which I have referenced, so you can see little of it is opinion (or rather, it is historian's opinion, not mine).
You can see which authorities it all comes from and make your own judgement.

Regards,
IronDuke
User avatar
David Heath
Posts: 2529
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2000 5:00 pm

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by David Heath »

Gentlemen

I am calling a truce to the fighting here. If I find any more name calling or insults being posted people will not be happy with my next move. Keep it civil or else.

David
Kevinugly
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 12:44 am
Location: Colchester, UK
Contact:

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by Kevinugly »

Well, well Kevinugly. . .

You rise and make another appearance.

Thoughtful as ever in your analysis.

I am so glad you are not a Patton basher - and are sticking to just the facts


Sarcasm [:D]

Sticking to the facts is all I do. And I'm STILL waiting for your analysis.

Here, I'll help you though -

From - http://www.qmfound.com/pol.htm

"While Patton was racing through France consuming an average of 350,000 gallons of gasoline each day, the famous Red Ball Express was organized to meet his growing demands as well as those of the First Army. Essentially a nonstop convoy of trucks connecting supply depots in Normandy to the armies in the field, the Red Ball at its peak used 6,000 trucks to complete its missions. As Patton advanced deeper, the demands placed upon the Red Ball grew faster than it was able to supply. Using 300,000 gallons of fuel each day itself, the Express pointed out what was becoming grossly obvious to tactical commanders, the Allies were running out of gas. On 28 August, Patton's army was forced to ease up when its fuel allocation fell 100,000 gallons short. Even though gasoline was in abundance in Normandy, the Red Ball could not transport it in sufficient quantities to the Third's forward units. On 31 August, after receiving no fuel at all, Patton's spearheads came to a halt.

During the next week, as Patton idled in park, General Dwight D. Eisenhower gave logistics priority and fuel allocations to units farther north. By the time normal fuel allocations resumed in the Third Army, the opportunity to sweep through Lorraine freely had passed by Patton.

Concurrently with his fuel problems, Patton experienced two other situations which began to jab at his side during this first part of September. First, as the Third Army became more stationary, it began to use its larger caliber artillery weapons, causing an ammunition shortage. There was no way to build up ammunition stockage because all available trucks were transporting fuel. As the Lorraine campaign continued, shortages would also be felt in clothing, rations, tires and antifreeze for the quickly approaching winter months.

Massing Forces

Secondly, as Patton's armies waited for the supply train to catch up, the Germans were massing forces throughout Lorraine. Hitler ordered soldiers into the area at once and their numbers would increase greatly. Even though still outnumbered by Patton's forces and superior firepower (estimated at 20 to 1 in tanks), these German forces, made up of many sick, deaf and garrison soldiers, would contest every inch of ground. This resistance caused the Third Army to fight considerably harder than they were accustomed during the first months of the campaign. Patton's two Corps, the XX and the XII, made up of four to six infantry divisions and two or three armor divisions, would be responsible for most fighting during the next bloody months in France.

In 1944, an armor division was relatively small compared to today. With 11,000 men and 263 tanks, it had three tank battalions, three battalions of armored infantry and three battalions of self- propelled artillery. Tactical doctrine of the day said that the armor division was primarily a weapon of exploitation to be used after the infantry achieved initial penetration into enemy defenses. This doctrine suited Patton to a tee, as he employed the mobile, quick-moving M-4 Sherman tank with its multipurpose 75mm gun. Patton's success, largely due to his understanding and use of heavy armored vehicles, made him the chief concern of the German armies of the time.

On 25 September, Patton was ordered to halt and to hold his ground until the logistical tail could restock itself before continuing. Patton, not being one to sit around and wait, established outposts, while maintaining active reserve contingency forces, and began to restock his own logistical base from within. Strict gasoline rationing and using mortars instead of large caliber weapon rounds lessened the initial two concerns of the Third Army. How do you resupply a heavy armor division in combat? Here's how Patton did it.

Quartermasters Important

First, Patton ordered stringent accountability of all supplies. The Quartermasters, due in large part to the severity of the crisis, were elevated in importance. Patton relied upon them for guidance and expertise. In addition to rationing supplies, he ordered that a supply base of reserves be stored within the Third Army for when they became fully operational again. His intelligence officers provided data on German movements in the area, and Patton wanted to be ready to move out at full speed when told to do so. No stopping the Third Army now, Patton must have thought. He did not realize then that he would basically be stationary until 8 Nov 44.

While better managing his own supplies, Patton also used other means of collecting additional assets from the local areas. Supplies and equipment from captured German forces were put to great use replenishing the Allied stocks. Once it was even reported that an artillery barrage from the XX Corps zone came from captured German 105mm howitzers, Russian-made 76.2mm guns, French 155mm howitzers (also captured from the Germans), and German 88mm antitank guns. During one period in October, 80 percent of artillery ammunition used by XX Corps was captured from German units.

Another key factor in resupplying Patton's Third Army was his use of what we now call "host nation support" from the French. As he was chasing the Germans through France, Patton became very familiar with the extensive French railroad network. Fortunately, it was left virtually undamaged by the Germans as they retreated through the country. Working with French civilians, the Third Army operated these railroads themselves, at times bringing supplies farther forward than ever before. In addition to the railroads, French factories provided relief for the Allies in such areas as repairing tank engines, building tank escape hatches and track extenders (which increased the tanks' mobility in the muddy terrain), supplying thousands of gallons of alcohol instead of the scarce Prestone antifreeze, reopening coal mines and dry-cleaning plants, and turning the rubber manufacturing plants over to Patton for the production of much-needed fan belts and tires.

Panzer Divisions

By the time November rolled around and the Third Army was able to start moving again, they had replenished their depleted stocks and had built a substantial reserve. With many of his logistical nightmares behind him for the moment, Patton could concentrate on the tactical campaign at hand and the difficulties that he was experiencing with the feared German panzer divisions. Even though greatly outnumbered, the Germans took advantage of Patton's weaknesses in neglecting to practice economy of force and were able to wage several counterattacks into the Allied forces. Patton believed that he should spread out his Third Army over a vast front so that he would be strong in all areas. This philosophy backfired on him, however, because the forces were spread too thin and were not particularly strong anywhere. As a result of this error, heavy doctrine changed after the war from fighting dispersed to marching dispersed but fighting concentrated and tight. Patton's Third Army suffered many casualties for not realizing this sooner against the German armies.

The campaign through Lorraine. France, in World War II truly demonstrated that logistics is the key to battle. Patton was an aggressive and powerful commander, but logistics controlled his ability to maneuver. At the beginning of the campaign, when he raced through France gambling with tactics and doctrine wherever he went, he achieved great successes. However, by September he realized that eventually in logistics you must repay and restock the hands that are feeding you. His neglect of fuel and ammunition shortages cost the entire army until finally he was forced to stop and regroup. His reliance on the Red Ball Express was too great. Not until he realized that it was consuming more than it was delivering did Patton turn to the more reliable means of rail transport and local requisitioning for resupply.

Patton's Third Army during the Lorraine campaign could not declare complete victory. In just over three months, the Third Army suffered 50,000 casualties and lost enormous amounts of equipment. The real victory of Lorraine was the soldier's ability to maintain the fight and the logisticians' ability to resupply the force. Fighting seemingly insurmountable odds and harsh weather conditions, Quartermasters of the day came through by using ingenuity, expertise, sheer hard work and determination.

Fight for Today

Look at the past, look towards the future, fight for today. Logisticians must be able to adapt and overcome, whatever odds may be in their way. The battle must continue for us all to win. Patton summed it up this way:

"You know that I have never asked one of you to go where I have feared to tread. I have been criticized for this, but there are many General Pattons and there is only one Third Army. I can be expended, but the Third Army must and will be victorious."

Leaders come and go, but the Army and the battle will continue. Will you be ready to support?

At the time this article was published, CPT Daniel G. Grassi was the Military Editor of the Quartermaster Professional Bulletin. He has a bachelor of arts degree in history from Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina. He is also a graduate of the Field Artillery Officer Basic Course, Quartermaster Officer Basic and Advanced Courses, Combined Arms and Services Staff School, Subsistence Officer Course, Contracting Officers Representative Course and the Installation Logistics Management Course. His previous assignments include Fire Direction Officer, Battery Executive Officer, Assistant Brigade S4, Troop Issue Subsistence Officer, Retail Services Officer, Battalion S1 and Commander, Uniform Company, 262d Quartermaster Battalion, Fort Lee, Virginia."

There is more to this article although the all the salient points are here.
Thankyou for using the World Wide Web. British designed, given freely to the World.
IronDuke_slith
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by IronDuke_slith »

ORIGINAL: Kevinugly
Well, well Kevinugly. . .

You rise and make another appearance.

Thoughtful as ever in your analysis.

I am so glad you are not a Patton basher - and are sticking to just the facts


Sarcasm [:D]

Sticking to the facts is all I do. And I'm STILL waiting for your analysis.

Here, I'll help you though -

From - http://www.qmfound.com/pol.htm

"While Patton was racing through France consuming an average of 350,000 gallons of gasoline each day, the famous Red Ball Express was organized to meet his growing demands as well as those of the First Army. Essentially a nonstop convoy of trucks connecting supply depots in Normandy to the armies in the field, the Red Ball at its peak used 6,000 trucks to complete its missions. As Patton advanced deeper, the demands placed upon the Red Ball grew faster than it was able to supply. Using 300,000 gallons of fuel each day itself, the Express pointed out what was becoming grossly obvious to tactical commanders, the Allies were running out of gas. On 28 August, Patton's army was forced to ease up when its fuel allocation fell 100,000 gallons short. Even though gasoline was in abundance in Normandy, the Red Ball could not transport it in sufficient quantities to the Third's forward units. On 31 August, after receiving no fuel at all, Patton's spearheads came to a halt.

During the next week, as Patton idled in park, General Dwight D. Eisenhower gave logistics priority and fuel allocations to units farther north. By the time normal fuel allocations resumed in the Third Army, the opportunity to sweep through Lorraine freely had passed by Patton.

Concurrently with his fuel problems, Patton experienced two other situations which began to jab at his side during this first part of September. First, as the Third Army became more stationary, it began to use its larger caliber artillery weapons, causing an ammunition shortage. There was no way to build up ammunition stockage because all available trucks were transporting fuel. As the Lorraine campaign continued, shortages would also be felt in clothing, rations, tires and antifreeze for the quickly approaching winter months.

Massing Forces

Secondly, as Patton's armies waited for the supply train to catch up, the Germans were massing forces throughout Lorraine. Hitler ordered soldiers into the area at once and their numbers would increase greatly. Even though still outnumbered by Patton's forces and superior firepower (estimated at 20 to 1 in tanks), these German forces, made up of many sick, deaf and garrison soldiers, would contest every inch of ground. This resistance caused the Third Army to fight considerably harder than they were accustomed during the first months of the campaign. Patton's two Corps, the XX and the XII, made up of four to six infantry divisions and two or three armor divisions, would be responsible for most fighting during the next bloody months in France.

In 1944, an armor division was relatively small compared to today. With 11,000 men and 263 tanks, it had three tank battalions, three battalions of armored infantry and three battalions of self- propelled artillery. Tactical doctrine of the day said that the armor division was primarily a weapon of exploitation to be used after the infantry achieved initial penetration into enemy defenses. This doctrine suited Patton to a tee, as he employed the mobile, quick-moving M-4 Sherman tank with its multipurpose 75mm gun. Patton's success, largely due to his understanding and use of heavy armored vehicles, made him the chief concern of the German armies of the time.

On 25 September, Patton was ordered to halt and to hold his ground until the logistical tail could restock itself before continuing. Patton, not being one to sit around and wait, established outposts, while maintaining active reserve contingency forces, and began to restock his own logistical base from within. Strict gasoline rationing and using mortars instead of large caliber weapon rounds lessened the initial two concerns of the Third Army. How do you resupply a heavy armor division in combat? Here's how Patton did it.

Quartermasters Important

First, Patton ordered stringent accountability of all supplies. The Quartermasters, due in large part to the severity of the crisis, were elevated in importance. Patton relied upon them for guidance and expertise. In addition to rationing supplies, he ordered that a supply base of reserves be stored within the Third Army for when they became fully operational again. His intelligence officers provided data on German movements in the area, and Patton wanted to be ready to move out at full speed when told to do so. No stopping the Third Army now, Patton must have thought. He did not realize then that he would basically be stationary until 8 Nov 44.

While better managing his own supplies, Patton also used other means of collecting additional assets from the local areas. Supplies and equipment from captured German forces were put to great use replenishing the Allied stocks. Once it was even reported that an artillery barrage from the XX Corps zone came from captured German 105mm howitzers, Russian-made 76.2mm guns, French 155mm howitzers (also captured from the Germans), and German 88mm antitank guns. During one period in October, 80 percent of artillery ammunition used by XX Corps was captured from German units.

Another key factor in resupplying Patton's Third Army was his use of what we now call "host nation support" from the French. As he was chasing the Germans through France, Patton became very familiar with the extensive French railroad network. Fortunately, it was left virtually undamaged by the Germans as they retreated through the country. Working with French civilians, the Third Army operated these railroads themselves, at times bringing supplies farther forward than ever before. In addition to the railroads, French factories provided relief for the Allies in such areas as repairing tank engines, building tank escape hatches and track extenders (which increased the tanks' mobility in the muddy terrain), supplying thousands of gallons of alcohol instead of the scarce Prestone antifreeze, reopening coal mines and dry-cleaning plants, and turning the rubber manufacturing plants over to Patton for the production of much-needed fan belts and tires.

Panzer Divisions

By the time November rolled around and the Third Army was able to start moving again, they had replenished their depleted stocks and had built a substantial reserve. With many of his logistical nightmares behind him for the moment, Patton could concentrate on the tactical campaign at hand and the difficulties that he was experiencing with the feared German panzer divisions. Even though greatly outnumbered, the Germans took advantage of Patton's weaknesses in neglecting to practice economy of force and were able to wage several counterattacks into the Allied forces. Patton believed that he should spread out his Third Army over a vast front so that he would be strong in all areas. This philosophy backfired on him, however, because the forces were spread too thin and were not particularly strong anywhere. As a result of this error, heavy doctrine changed after the war from fighting dispersed to marching dispersed but fighting concentrated and tight. Patton's Third Army suffered many casualties for not realizing this sooner against the German armies.

The campaign through Lorraine. France, in World War II truly demonstrated that logistics is the key to battle. Patton was an aggressive and powerful commander, but logistics controlled his ability to maneuver. At the beginning of the campaign, when he raced through France gambling with tactics and doctrine wherever he went, he achieved great successes. However, by September he realized that eventually in logistics you must repay and restock the hands that are feeding you. His neglect of fuel and ammunition shortages cost the entire army until finally he was forced to stop and regroup. His reliance on the Red Ball Express was too great. Not until he realized that it was consuming more than it was delivering did Patton turn to the more reliable means of rail transport and local requisitioning for resupply.

Patton's Third Army during the Lorraine campaign could not declare complete victory. In just over three months, the Third Army suffered 50,000 casualties and lost enormous amounts of equipment. The real victory of Lorraine was the soldier's ability to maintain the fight and the logisticians' ability to resupply the force. Fighting seemingly insurmountable odds and harsh weather conditions, Quartermasters of the day came through by using ingenuity, expertise, sheer hard work and determination.

Fight for Today

Look at the past, look towards the future, fight for today. Logisticians must be able to adapt and overcome, whatever odds may be in their way. The battle must continue for us all to win. Patton summed it up this way:

"You know that I have never asked one of you to go where I have feared to tread. I have been criticized for this, but there are many General Pattons and there is only one Third Army. I can be expended, but the Third Army must and will be victorious."

Leaders come and go, but the Army and the battle will continue. Will you be ready to support?

At the time this article was published, CPT Daniel G. Grassi was the Military Editor of the Quartermaster Professional Bulletin. He has a bachelor of arts degree in history from Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina. He is also a graduate of the Field Artillery Officer Basic Course, Quartermaster Officer Basic and Advanced Courses, Combined Arms and Services Staff School, Subsistence Officer Course, Contracting Officers Representative Course and the Installation Logistics Management Course. His previous assignments include Fire Direction Officer, Battery Executive Officer, Assistant Brigade S4, Troop Issue Subsistence Officer, Retail Services Officer, Battalion S1 and Commander, Uniform Company, 262d Quartermaster Battalion, Fort Lee, Virginia."

There is more to this article although the all the salient points are here.

I'm impressed, never seen this site before. If I say so myself, I mentioned some of these points in my post but he's clear that the final attacks on Metz in November were badly handled and that the logistical constraints were a thing of the past. Couple that with the Queen orders which did not require Patton to fight, and it's a grim campaign indeed.

That said, the Author says little of the period between 5/9/44 and 25/9/44, when despite fighting with logistical issues, Patton sucked in enough of the German reserves to blunt the counterattack they were attempting to mount (which eventually went in around Arracourt and was stopped by 4th Armoured.) I broadly agree with the author. When handling a set piece battle, Patton had big problems. I made the same criticism of his deployments in the drive on Bastogne, spreading three divisions across 25 miles rather than concentrating for a decisive breakthrough and assault.

This also emphasises the logistical problems facing the Allies which I tried to get across in my last major posting. Was it Rommel who said the battle is decided before it begins by the quartermaster?

Thanks for the article,
Ironduke
User avatar
Von Rom
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by Von Rom »

ORIGINAL: riverbravo

Do you think Patton really would have driven so hard to palermo if he didnt think it would gain some fame and kick a bit of dirt on Monty?

Friendly rivalry is one thing but other peoples lives are at stake.

The slapping incident....yes..Did he not have the sense to just walk away.Have an underling punish the coward,put him in a mess unit...whatever...Just slap some sense into him,that'll do it.Was he so caught up in himself and thought everyone feared him so much that somebody wouldnt tell?He mite have had his boys scared of him but the people he crossed outside of his unit were probably waiting for a shot.Once again his hot-head gets him trouble.You cant blame the crap-diggers for digging things up that are true.

The chaplain thing,well....whatever he choses to do.He is in command.IMO,bad move,a strike against him for a borderline loon call on that one.Was the chaplain a relative?

I had heard something about him using troops for some kind of personal deal with family.I dont know specifics and will have to look into it.If in fact true thats way outta line.

Also,the signed card thing,that seems a bit like the german fighter aces anf their cards....once again ...glory seeking.

Patton wanted to fight and wanted glory ....fine,no problem with that but glory finds you,you dont seek it.

The blood and guts thing.Another of pattons nicknames that was twisted by the troops to a more fitting slogan to better show his glorious ways.

Patton overall was a good General and the only one that really scared the Germans.Unfortunatly Pattons legacy will be tarnished by the things he did on and off the battlefield and things that were completely his doing.All the bad press Patton got he called down on himself.

Like all good Generals, a controversial figure to say the least.

riverbravo:

There are a few things I will discuss:

1) Palermo:

Patton's original intention was to land at Palermo, capture it as a base for supplies, and then push to Messina, capture it, and bag ALL the Axis forces on Sicily.

Unfortunately, Monty got his way, and opted for a frontal attack in the south against entrenched Axis forces in the mountains, with Third Army sitting idle on his flank.

After two weeks of this Patton had had enough. He flew to see Alexander, and persuaded him to allow Third Army to seize Palermo and then drive to Messina. In a second meeting Monty himself agreed with Patton's strategy, because 8th Army had become bogged down in bitter mountain fighting, and he felt Patton's drive would help draw off some Axis forces from his front.

So, even with an imposed two week delay, Patton drove to Palermo, bagged 57,000 Axis troops, then conducted three amphibious operations to by-pass entrenched German defenders, and still captured Messina ahead of Monty.

However, that two week delay meant that 100,000 Axis troops and 10,000 vehicles escaped to Italy to wind up fighting Allied soldiers again in Italy and in the Lorraine Campaign.

Alexander simply bungled the Sicily Campaign by adhering to Monty's plan; imposing inactivity on Patton's Third Army; and in not having planes bomb the ferries that were taking the Axis troops to Italy.


2) The Slapping Incident:

I have already dealt with this. All I will add is this:

Before the slapping incident Patton had just come from the battlefield where he saw many dead men. Then, while at the hospital he had met many soldiers who were terribly maimed, wounded and disfigured in battle.

Then he came to a soldier who was sitting on the edge of a bed crying. That is when Patton's outrage at the man's actions caused him to slap the soldier's helmet with his glove. He did not want that man in the same room as all those wounded and dying men.

What is not known about, and was not publized at the time, was that the man Patton slapped was AWOL from his unit. Being AWOL in time of war was grounds for court martial, prison or execution. Interesting how that never made it into the papers, eh?

Well, whenever you feel outraged over Patton's action, just remember the last time you lost your cool, and then later regretted it.

People make mistakes. . .

But all of this needs to be placed into the perspective of the larger war. Thousands of men were being killed EVERY DAY, and yet a few reporters wanted the Allies' BEST general to be removed from command just when the Allies needed him the most (at Anzio and D-day).

Cheers!
User avatar
Von Rom
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by Von Rom »

ORIGINAL: IronDuke
Ironduke:

Not enough action in your Monty thread?

Or is it too boring with all the fanboys agreeing on bashing Monty?

It seems the same handful of people who bashed Patton are now bashing Monty. . .

It is true that "religious fanatics" travel in packs, seeking whom they may devour. . .

I posted Patton's picture so your "Congregation of Patton Bashers" could see on a daily basis who you were bashing. And that you could see how respected Patton was by the Moroccan Gov't.

This is paranoia, I don't know anything about this so will refrain from comment. I would say why didn't you tell us the Morroccan Government liked him, I would have refrained from posting over 19 pages had I know this. [8|]
Heheh

I didn't think that you or any of your fanboys would have a clue as to why I posted Patton's picture in my signature.

As to displaying Patton's picture in my signature:

It's an old legal stratagem: Display a victim's picture in front of the victim's accusers. . .


As usual, your analysis is so one-sided as to be laughable. . .

But please don't let the facts get in the way of your over-zealous opinions. . .

It's also an old legal strategm to ignore uncomfortable arguments you can't answer by saying "This argument is so silly, I can't be bothered to answer." I've answered all of your posts, even where they were quite clearly nonsense. It's another strategm to claim the other side have no facts, when that is all they have presented. If the Hammelburg raid did not take place, tell the world. If I am proved wrong, I will apologise publicly. Otherwise, this is dodging the issue. The sign of a bankrupt argument, unfortunately.

IronDuke

Heheh

Yet, the hysteria from some who have continually called me names and attacked my character.

Heheh

Yes, I have read some of your answers to my posts.

Many of them were not worth answering. . .
User avatar
Von Rom
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Why was Patton so great?

Post by Von Rom »

ORIGINAL: Kevinugly
Well, well Kevinugly. . .

You rise and make another appearance.

Thoughtful as ever in your analysis.

I am so glad you are not a Patton basher - and are sticking to just the facts


Sarcasm [:D]

Sticking to the facts is all I do. And I'm STILL waiting for your analysis.

Here, I'll help you though -

From - http://www.qmfound.com/pol.htm

"While Patton was racing through France consuming an average of 350,000 gallons of gasoline each day, the famous Red Ball Express was organized to meet his growing demands as well as those of the First Army. Essentially a nonstop convoy of trucks connecting supply depots in Normandy to the armies in the field, the Red Ball at its peak used 6,000 trucks to complete its missions. As Patton advanced deeper, the demands placed upon the Red Ball grew faster than it was able to supply. Using 300,000 gallons of fuel each day itself, the Express pointed out what was becoming grossly obvious to tactical commanders, the Allies were running out of gas. On 28 August, Patton's army was forced to ease up when its fuel allocation fell 100,000 gallons short. Even though gasoline was in abundance in Normandy, the Red Ball could not transport it in sufficient quantities to the Third's forward units. On 31 August, after receiving no fuel at all, Patton's spearheads came to a halt.

During the next week, as Patton idled in park, General Dwight D. Eisenhower gave logistics priority and fuel allocations to units farther north. By the time normal fuel allocations resumed in the Third Army, the opportunity to sweep through Lorraine freely had passed by Patton.

Concurrently with his fuel problems, Patton experienced two other situations which began to jab at his side during this first part of September. First, as the Third Army became more stationary, it began to use its larger caliber artillery weapons, causing an ammunition shortage. There was no way to build up ammunition stockage because all available trucks were transporting fuel. As the Lorraine campaign continued, shortages would also be felt in clothing, rations, tires and antifreeze for the quickly approaching winter months.

Massing Forces

Secondly, as Patton's armies waited for the supply train to catch up, the Germans were massing forces throughout Lorraine. Hitler ordered soldiers into the area at once and their numbers would increase greatly. Even though still outnumbered by Patton's forces and superior firepower (estimated at 20 to 1 in tanks), these German forces, made up of many sick, deaf and garrison soldiers, would contest every inch of ground. This resistance caused the Third Army to fight considerably harder than they were accustomed during the first months of the campaign. Patton's two Corps, the XX and the XII, made up of four to six infantry divisions and two or three armor divisions, would be responsible for most fighting during the next bloody months in France.

In 1944, an armor division was relatively small compared to today. With 11,000 men and 263 tanks, it had three tank battalions, three battalions of armored infantry and three battalions of self- propelled artillery. Tactical doctrine of the day said that the armor division was primarily a weapon of exploitation to be used after the infantry achieved initial penetration into enemy defenses. This doctrine suited Patton to a tee, as he employed the mobile, quick-moving M-4 Sherman tank with its multipurpose 75mm gun. Patton's success, largely due to his understanding and use of heavy armored vehicles, made him the chief concern of the German armies of the time.

On 25 September, Patton was ordered to halt and to hold his ground until the logistical tail could restock itself before continuing. Patton, not being one to sit around and wait, established outposts, while maintaining active reserve contingency forces, and began to restock his own logistical base from within. Strict gasoline rationing and using mortars instead of large caliber weapon rounds lessened the initial two concerns of the Third Army. How do you resupply a heavy armor division in combat? Here's how Patton did it.

Quartermasters Important

First, Patton ordered stringent accountability of all supplies. The Quartermasters, due in large part to the severity of the crisis, were elevated in importance. Patton relied upon them for guidance and expertise. In addition to rationing supplies, he ordered that a supply base of reserves be stored within the Third Army for when they became fully operational again. His intelligence officers provided data on German movements in the area, and Patton wanted to be ready to move out at full speed when told to do so. No stopping the Third Army now, Patton must have thought. He did not realize then that he would basically be stationary until 8 Nov 44.

While better managing his own supplies, Patton also used other means of collecting additional assets from the local areas. Supplies and equipment from captured German forces were put to great use replenishing the Allied stocks. Once it was even reported that an artillery barrage from the XX Corps zone came from captured German 105mm howitzers, Russian-made 76.2mm guns, French 155mm howitzers (also captured from the Germans), and German 88mm antitank guns. During one period in October, 80 percent of artillery ammunition used by XX Corps was captured from German units.

Another key factor in resupplying Patton's Third Army was his use of what we now call "host nation support" from the French. As he was chasing the Germans through France, Patton became very familiar with the extensive French railroad network. Fortunately, it was left virtually undamaged by the Germans as they retreated through the country. Working with French civilians, the Third Army operated these railroads themselves, at times bringing supplies farther forward than ever before. In addition to the railroads, French factories provided relief for the Allies in such areas as repairing tank engines, building tank escape hatches and track extenders (which increased the tanks' mobility in the muddy terrain), supplying thousands of gallons of alcohol instead of the scarce Prestone antifreeze, reopening coal mines and dry-cleaning plants, and turning the rubber manufacturing plants over to Patton for the production of much-needed fan belts and tires.

Panzer Divisions

By the time November rolled around and the Third Army was able to start moving again, they had replenished their depleted stocks and had built a substantial reserve. With many of his logistical nightmares behind him for the moment, Patton could concentrate on the tactical campaign at hand and the difficulties that he was experiencing with the feared German panzer divisions. Even though greatly outnumbered, the Germans took advantage of Patton's weaknesses in neglecting to practice economy of force and were able to wage several counterattacks into the Allied forces. Patton believed that he should spread out his Third Army over a vast front so that he would be strong in all areas. This philosophy backfired on him, however, because the forces were spread too thin and were not particularly strong anywhere. As a result of this error, heavy doctrine changed after the war from fighting dispersed to marching dispersed but fighting concentrated and tight. Patton's Third Army suffered many casualties for not realizing this sooner against the German armies.

The campaign through Lorraine. France, in World War II truly demonstrated that logistics is the key to battle. Patton was an aggressive and powerful commander, but logistics controlled his ability to maneuver. At the beginning of the campaign, when he raced through France gambling with tactics and doctrine wherever he went, he achieved great successes. However, by September he realized that eventually in logistics you must repay and restock the hands that are feeding you. His neglect of fuel and ammunition shortages cost the entire army until finally he was forced to stop and regroup. His reliance on the Red Ball Express was too great. Not until he realized that it was consuming more than it was delivering did Patton turn to the more reliable means of rail transport and local requisitioning for resupply.

Patton's Third Army during the Lorraine campaign could not declare complete victory. In just over three months, the Third Army suffered 50,000 casualties and lost enormous amounts of equipment. The real victory of Lorraine was the soldier's ability to maintain the fight and the logisticians' ability to resupply the force. Fighting seemingly insurmountable odds and harsh weather conditions, Quartermasters of the day came through by using ingenuity, expertise, sheer hard work and determination.

Fight for Today

Look at the past, look towards the future, fight for today. Logisticians must be able to adapt and overcome, whatever odds may be in their way. The battle must continue for us all to win. Patton summed it up this way:

"You know that I have never asked one of you to go where I have feared to tread. I have been criticized for this, but there are many General Pattons and there is only one Third Army. I can be expended, but the Third Army must and will be victorious."

Leaders come and go, but the Army and the battle will continue. Will you be ready to support?

At the time this article was published, CPT Daniel G. Grassi was the Military Editor of the Quartermaster Professional Bulletin. He has a bachelor of arts degree in history from Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina. He is also a graduate of the Field Artillery Officer Basic Course, Quartermaster Officer Basic and Advanced Courses, Combined Arms and Services Staff School, Subsistence Officer Course, Contracting Officers Representative Course and the Installation Logistics Management Course. His previous assignments include Fire Direction Officer, Battery Executive Officer, Assistant Brigade S4, Troop Issue Subsistence Officer, Retail Services Officer, Battalion S1 and Commander, Uniform Company, 262d Quartermaster Battalion, Fort Lee, Virginia."

There is more to this article although the all the salient points are here.

Facts?

Please. . .

I see it's still three to one against me. . .

Heheh

So, you posted an article.

I have posted articles and they were totally ignored.

Now, you declare that I must respond to the article YOU post? [8|]

For example:

Ironduke said Patton was poor in Combined Arms, and I posted two well researched articles proving Patton was a master at Combined Arms. Those articles were ignored.

Ete, etc. . .

However, I will respond to this article ONCE you extract the relevant points from it that you wish me to discuss.

Plus, I will NOT be responding to half a dozen people at once. There is absolutely no way I can do that and still provide reasonable information.

So extract the info you wish me to consider, and I will look at it.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”