Hi Ranger,

great that you are back. Not sure if you saw my posting that I look for an opponent to test my update of Flankers scenario and his program updates. I'm now doing final adjustments and testing these.

Cheers,
Chris

Short update on game test, playing both sides, May1942 now:

The changes made the game much more historical. The supply and production on both sides forces different strategic approaches.

German side is forced into mobile warfare with breakthroughs, encirclement and forced Russian surrender ...

Sending zip did not work, sent you a download link.

Hello Chen,

will send you zip file asap. Please check your spam folder if it is not received today.

BTW your English is fine.

Cheers,
Chris

Don't trust your eyes, fog of war.

Better check in the loss screen if more ships are listed there. This seems to be more accurate.

Cheers,
Chris

I just testing the Flanker modification v12 and production wise it is far closer to the historic figures than WIR original. Would love to test it against an other player. Any takers?

Cheers,
Chris

Short update: The program upgrades in Flanker's version are great. I did some tweaks on the ...

Hi guys,

didn't check here for a while, ready for a game. Any takers?

Cheers

<t> Hi Rich,<br/>
<br/>
sorry for late reply, really appreciate your work. Real life and playing WIR for a change got in the way. Anyway, testing continues:<br/>
<br/>
11/20/44<br/>
<br/>
7.1 Bug in port Singapore, SEAC HQ: Have US CVEs and RN ships in port and can NOT create “Escort Carrier ...

<t> 6.1 2/27/44 Problem with Port Moresby ship passage. TF get diverted around Australia although Japs have no Air Zones there.<br/>
<br/>
6.2 Brit CVE TF finally did air attack on LCU. However icon used was P47, not F6 as on board.<br/>
<br/>
6.3 Regarding CVE, would it be possible to restrict ...

re 5.2 I tried to attach a screen shot here and in the email I sent you but there is no option for it.

Hi Bill,

how come we never plaid each other? Up for a game [:D]

Cheers,
Chris

<r> Update<br/>
<br/>
5.1 5/30/43 Independence CVL with Hellcat & TBM, not in production yet.<br/>
<br/>
5.2 8/1/43 still fighting A5M instead of Zeros, the Zero losses were not that high.<br/>
<br/>
5.3 9/12/43 Lost General by Friendly Fire in air attack. Happens too often and never to the ...

Video is cool [:)]

re our game, I take Japs then[;)]

I understand that this is how the game does it but was it the same in reality? I remember that in Pearl the attack was with torpedoes.

Hi Brad,

August is fine for me. Can play IJ or A [8D]

<t> 4.1 3/14/43 automatic Replenish TF created for Brit Echodale, disappeared. Manual TF creation OK.<br/>
<br/>
4.2 Amph TF lost 4 of 12 AP (100) but the LCU (>1100) lost nothing and landed in full strength.<br/>
<br/>
4.3 Attacks on air fields start to work for both sides.<br/>
<br/>
4.4 5 ...

<t> Hi Rich, sorry for late reply, see my reply marked /// below:<br/>
Thanks for continuing to look for issues; it's a big help.<br/>
<br/>
3.1 I tested this and the "T" showed up in Colombo as expected. Was Colombo isolated at the time? /// No<br/>
<br/>
3.2 The old code unfairly protects ...

Thanks [:)]

Once 3.2.15 is tested we should play again [8D]

<t> Hi Rich,<br/>
<br/>
short reply: <br/>
<br/>
misspelled Andaman Islands near Rangoon.<br/>
<br/>
Attack on AFB usually yielded at least some damaged ac. But I may remember wrongly.<br/>
<br/>
From now on I start numbering my points, easier to refer to:<br/>
<br/>
3.1 12/13/42 T sub ...

<r> 01/25/42 #75wing arrived in Sydney with 4 Beaufort, which is not in stock or production.<br/>
<br/>
03/08/42 Beaufort production started. <br/>
<br/>
Was the range of F4 Wildcat changed (shows 2) but can jump from Island to island?<br/>
<br/>
Combat TF automatic get ROS assignment, can be ...