I had the same problem when I installed the patch, (and also before the beta one; I posted about it in "1.01beta bugs: font size - 1/17/2008"). The solution is to uninstall all and then reinstall game and then the patch. Now it works.

sorry, but few minutes ago I disinstalled the game and then reinstalled the game and the patch and now it works.

I installed the 1.01 beta patch. The fonts are too big now, much more their windows, and so the game isn't playable.

Thanks for all MartNick. This is the leader for your new Prussian set with a reversed flag.

Thanks Unhappy.... I'll tray the scenario as soon as possible.

I found the solution on search range too short in Midway scenario:
if you delete USA and Japan countries by editor the scenario works right. I would change the sarch doctrine bat I don't know  the historic values.

<t> I played a midway random scenario. I sow the Japanese all search planes have a range more short than before the beta-patch: only 120 NM (6 esa). It's this range correct? It's too difficult to spot enemy carriers for Japanese player. If he do it his carriers are so near enemy that it's very ...

Is It possible to refuelling TG by TG-fuel? If isn't possible those TG-fuel are useless in the game, isn't it?

<r> Thr atachment is the data of the two strike wave on Midway. Sorry. Thin it in the link<br/>
<URL url="http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-07062005-173306/"><LINK_TEXT text="http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available ... 05-173306/">http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-07062005 ...

I found these data about the two strikes agains midway.
If you want see what AI does, select to play as Japan and select AI control on all commands.

<t> It's easy to change AI warcards with the editor. There is a warcard colled "strike landbase" so you have to ad it, but look at the right thread. <br/>
Save the scenario file with another name, but better make before a backup of the scenarios directory. <br/>
<br/>
Vin is for Vincent. Boni my ...

Well, it's not difficult to add a new warrom card for strike Midway by japanese carriers. I will tray it.

<r> An interesting dissertation is "Carrier Battles: Command Decision in Harm's Way".<br/>
You find it here: <URL url="http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-07062005-173306/"><LINK_TEXT text="http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available ... 05-173306/">http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd ...

I tray to change some scenario cards in the warroom editor to have a better US AI in Wake Island scenario. AI plays more batter. Is not important AI engine itself, I think. but warrom cards that make AI strategy.

I'd like an editor manual more accurate to expalin warcards employment. I need it to make a better AI US strategy in some scenario.

<t> An exemple of bad AI for US navy.<br/>
In Wake scenario US carriers exit out the map without tray intercept japanese invasion fleet when it arrived near Wake island. It should be easy to win by strike invasion fleet. Us navy prefers to save is carriers and so lost. Now I tray to change some ...

When I play as Japan AI isn't adequate I think. It's very easy to win in many different scenarios, but when I play as Allied is much more difficult.

"Suspense option" doesn't work when allied strikes attack japanese ships. The damnage on the ships is visible before the strike. I sow it in midway scenario playng with allied.

In the editor you now can find "edit countries" feature, but it doesn't work.

No, I like this game. I wrote to you my e.mail address if you want to play.