Any ETA of implementation of some of these improvements and bugs that have been found?

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: PDiFolco<br/>
<br/>
Well you can do much with the game editor, but if you're really wanting a sci-fi tac game you'd better get one instead of AT, which is an operational WW2 themed game ! [;)]<br/>
<br/>
If I want a sports car I don't look a SUV catalog to see ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Twotribes<br/>
<br/>
You could then recreate this by making your own subformations with varied ranges and power. A "division" can have 8 subformations, think of them as weapon systems if you like. So each UNIT could have up to 8 weapon systems.
<e>[/quote]</e ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: PDiFolco<br/>
<br/>
Thefunction,<br/>
Game systems with various weapon platforms are mostrly tactical, you won't find this in AT neither TOAW nor any other operational-strategic game I have in mind, because they simulate days of combat by many units/soldiers ...

<t> Hehe in general I prefer (war)games (tacops 4, combat mission, and steel panther tend to be my favorites) with no unit production (tactical mostly I suppose, atleast when it comes to computers. When it comes to dorking it up with cardstock, playability (usually) demands a slightly larger scale ...

<t> I'm kind of on the fence between this and TAOW3 kind of leaning towards AT. This kind of hinges on mod ability of units for the creation of an O.G.E.R./G.E.V. in WW2 alternate history scenario.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Is it possible to create a "super unit" a unit that gets multiple attacks at ...