I may be up for a game with you if you don't mind playing the Union. I think it would be better to start out playing a scenario rather than the whole thing though these PBEM games take a while to get through.

Anyone got an idea where you can go to find play by e-mail opponents other than the ACWGC?

<t> I've been playing the AI and am begining to adjust to the game play still need to spend more time reading the manual I'm just too lazy to do it.<br/>
Maybe you are right about the settings I am using Vista perhaps it will improve with the 24 bit graphics there's something missing IMO. I looked ...

<t> Yep that's the game I mean. The Battle ground series IMO was much sharper/clearer, I liked the unit dialouge box's too and as mentioned the graphics looked much better. Chalk and cheese to you maybe, but the reason I purchased the CS was I was led to believe it was an inprovement on the Ardennes ...

<t> I'm very dissapointed with the graphics on this game.&nbsp; Previously I had the 'Aredennes Offensive'&nbsp; which I gather from the forum is no longer available as the coding has been lost (very odd)[&:].&nbsp; I read that the 'Campaign Series' was a superior replacement.&nbsp; "Why do you need ...

<t> Hi, I just found this site and am new here. [:)] I have purchased in the past a few of the Battleground games this was several years ago now although I played the AI to death finding real like opponents wasn't easy. The problem I had then was there wasn't anywhere (at least not that I knew of ...

I had BB Ardennes and thought it was pretty good. What is the CS series you speak of? Would be interested to take a look if it's as good as you suggest.