<t> I feel my comments have been taken as way more severe than meant to. This problem afflicts a few scenarios, this was just the one most vivid in my memory. Unfortunately I see a tendency in briefings to avoid being 'technical' (maybe fear of losing immersion?) but it is better to break character ...

<r> There are several instances but the one I remember most vividly because there were 2-3 instances just in this one scenario was Canary Cage (bad with names and memory, the one you play as Spain against North African states). I think there was a case of landing a recon unit that the instructions w...

<t> Well I didn't know that saying that some scenario briefings are incomplete was synonymous to attacking the scenario designer community or asking/expecting something to be done about it [&:]<br/> <br/> It is just a shame to play a scenario for upwards of 20-30 hours (I am a micromanaging frea...

<t> First of all I have only played scenarios under the "Standalone Scenarios" folder. Are these official game scenarios or not?<br/> <br/> Second, I would expect anyone who is smart enough to write a scenario for CMANO, good enough to be distributed with the game, to not require feedback on somethi...

<r> Yeah it does hit a nerve for two reasons.<br/> <br/> One it ruins my immersion and enjoyment of a victory when I have to search the forums (or even worse, fiddle with the editor) just to see what the magic handhsake to win the scenario was, when I have totally trounced the computer AI in every p...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mikmyk<br/> <br/> The community scenarios are a volunteer effort and people are learning so I think patience and helping people out would probably yield a better return in the long run. Might even make a friend or two [:)]<br/> <e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE> <br/> I am no...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Randomizer<br/> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>I do have one criticism that I agree with. Scenario briefings are often out of sync with that is going on, or woefully incomplete as to victory conditions and specific actions that must be taken to meet them. Often I have found ...

<t> CMANO is (thankfully) not for everyone. It takes significant commitment and interest in the subject to get into this game. Even in my group of tabletop wargamer friends very few would even consider touching it. This is why I like it. Realism over user-friendliness and over-simplification. There ...

Were the helicopters of the same type and loadout? I don't know if it is still the case but I think at some point the 1/3 rule only applied to exactly identical platforms.

<t> There is an RoE (I think it is called "Use Air Refuelling") that can be used to tell aircraft if they should use tankers for air refualling or not.<br/> <br/> I keep this off by default and only turn it on for a unit when I specifically want that unit to use air refualling. To my experience that...

I go over all the AI options at the start of every scenario so I am good either way. [8D]

I could be wrong but I think CMANO works with classes of targets. If the weapon is not designated as useable against submarines it does not matter if it is surfaced or not.

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Now we'll sit back and wait for the "why aren't my ships lighting up their radars to defend against the incoming aircraft/missiles" posts [;)]<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE> <br/> I really don't understand why people would complain about that. I set up new contact messages as popup ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>We understand, however, that some players want their units to remain EMCON-silent even with enemy weapons incoming.<br/> <br/> For this reason, from Build 513 onwards this behavior is now doctrine-configurable and OFF by default. <e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE> <br/> Excellent news!...

<t> I guess when the group is dissolved the individual members inherit the side RoE rather than the (now defunct) group RoE. I can imagine cases where a player could want either (I would generally want the side RoE to take effect when removing a unit from a group or mission, but in some cases, such ...

Thanks!

<t> Either there is somethig very wrong with Infabtry explosives or I missed some kind of instructions.<br/> <br/> I am trying to play Choking Halifax. There is a Recon team that is supposed to attack a building with C-4. When I attack from a relative distance, even though I get green OK that the we...

This scenario came with the game.

<t> Apparently, the landing ships must enter the landing zone and then lunch the smaller landing craft that must then reach the smaller landing area. Additionally the landing zone Ref points are set in the sequence 2134 instead of 1234 which, based on how the graphic displays for mission areas, woul...

<t> Thanks for the tip on the recon team. I will try it.<br/> <br/> I changed the course of the two naval groups multiple times and never got a defeat message. One enemy sub did get through my screen and almost within shot of my carrier, but fortunately was discovered by the last line of defense and...