<t> Since I prefer playing detailed battles with icons instead of the little men running around and so forth, I've discovered some issues. <br/>
First, as far as I've been able to see, there's no way to see divisions and organization of units when having them as icons. Also, when supply wagons are ...

<t> I don't mind taking casulties like that, if I at least can overrun the guns. Problem is they put up a fight. No infantry unit would stay there in the line of fire and try to gun it out, instead they would close in and close them down. Naturally this would take it's toll, but if the unit isn't ...

<t> Good points from both of you. Firstly, I don't really mind artillery doing damage, what I do mind is the difficulty to take them out. As I wrote above, I belive that an artillery unit that can't rout all close by standing enemies should be captured, or rout itself. Artillery was vulnerable ...

<t> Yes, that is true, but in both Shiloh and Stones River the battling armies were approximatly the same strenght, give or take about 10.000. In what I experienced I had 114.000 men surrounding about 44.000 men. Five batteries to trash that entire force?<br/>
And I'm not saying armies didn't get ...

<r> Bear with me, this might be a long post, but I hope you will find it interesting.<br/>
First things first, I'm an old school wargamer, started with boardgames ages ago (a favourite was 'Civil War' by VG [;)]). Finding a good game that covers the civil war has been hard, so I was really eager to ...