Search found 260 matches

by Lanconic
Wed May 16, 2012 10:20 am
Forum: War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945
Topic: Proposal for CHS - Remove the Zero bonus. Any opinions?
Replies: 721
Views: 5041

RE: Proposal for CHS - Remove the Zero bonus. Any opinions?

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Bradley7735<br/> <br/> This response isn't directed to Honda in particular, but all of you who think Mdiehl is nuts.<br/> <br/> He's the only one who is producing actual facts to back up his opinion. I haven't seen anyone who thinks the Zero bonus is valid produce ...
by Lanconic
Thu Nov 24, 2011 10:15 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: And the mistake was?
Replies: 23
Views: 659

RE: And the mistake was?

<t> Ok no there is no fragment, I would see that on the divisional display<br/> <br/> I suspect that it was a supply based issue and the men what? Died of thirst?<br/> <br/> I used the entire division.<br/> <br/> It was 9/1/42 when I landed<br/> <br/> The division right now is resting at Pearl 260 s...
by Lanconic
Thu Nov 24, 2011 6:17 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: And the mistake was?
Replies: 23
Views: 659

And the mistake was?

<t> Ok I landed the entire first Marine on Baker Island. It had the correct designation for 100 days<br/> I used 5 AP<br/> It had the support of six CV and six BB.<br/> The landing was not opposed by the IJN<br/> <br/> I landed on a SNLF and a small BF<br/> <br/> It took two weeks to clear the islan...
by Lanconic
Thu Nov 24, 2011 4:51 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: The Royal Navy DD vanish
Replies: 4
Views: 118

RE: The Royal Navy DD vanish

Ok so I am stupid really =) Seems like they are being converted, not refit
But they are in the shipyard after all
by Lanconic
Thu Nov 24, 2011 3:00 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: The Royal Navy DD vanish
Replies: 4
Views: 118

The Royal Navy DD vanish

It is Jan 1943 and I just noticed that all the RN Destroyers are missing. Not sunk. Missing
The Aussies seem unaffected and the Dutch as well.

Anyone have any idea?
by Lanconic
Sun Nov 13, 2011 12:47 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Cannot withdraw ships
Replies: 4
Views: 95

Cannot withdraw ships

<t> At the current turn I have ten allied ships that need to be withdrawn<br/> I am using something 106q something<br/> <br/> I was told to try and use an older instal of the game<br/> just to remove the ships, and then go back to the newest.<br/> <br/> I keep trying that, and I get 'save file faile...
by Lanconic
Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:35 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Mein Gott! - The last ride of the Hyuga
Replies: 2
Views: 102

Mein Gott! - The last ride of the Hyuga

<t> This was bizarre. I was trying to scare her away. But she would have none of it.<br/> *********************************************<br/> <br/> <br/> Night Time Surface Combat, near Pearl Harbor at 180,107, Range 11,000 Yards<br/> <br/> Japanese Ships<br/> BB Hyuga, Shell hits 18, Torpedo hits 1,...
by Lanconic
Thu Nov 10, 2011 12:22 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Still cant withdraw ships????
Replies: 1
Views: 83

Still cant withdraw ships????

Its been a LONG time now, but I still cant withdraw my scedualed ships.
It isnt that I dont like The Queen Mary but I am sure the Empire has better uses for her.
by Lanconic
Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:35 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Not all useless after all - PT-Boats
Replies: 16
Views: 156

Not all useless after all - PT-Boats

<t> Night Time Surface Combat, near Noumea at 115,160, Range 10,000 Yards<br/> <br/> Japanese Ships<br/> CA Aoba, Torpedo hits 1<br/> DD Yomogi<br/> DD Karii<br/> <br/> Allied Ships<br/> PT-36<br/> PT-37<br/> PT-38<br/> PT-39<br/> PT-40, Shell hits 1, and is sunk<br/> PT-43<br/> PT-44, Shell hits 1,...
by Lanconic
Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:13 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: JFB question: Failure to capture Palembang in '42
Replies: 103
Views: 1130

RE: JFB question: Failure to capture Palembang in '42

I dont have any problem with Japan grabbing Palembang early. He isnt gonna be sending tankers down there any time soon.
What is the big deal?

by Lanconic
Fri Oct 21, 2011 5:24 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Editor weirdness - or Patch intended?
Replies: 0
Views: 44

Editor weirdness - or Patch intended?

<t> I am forced to start over and I was using the game editor64 to edit a scenario file<br/> <br/> US Infantry squads had a build rate of 60 before. Now its 71?????<br/> Marine is 54?<br/> <br/> also I gave myself 10k infantry squads and when the game runs, it is zero infantry squads<br/> <br/> I do...
by Lanconic
Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:57 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Patch question
Replies: 1
Views: 55

Patch question

patch 1061108p3

Is it compatible with existing games?
by Lanconic
Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:38 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: WTH??? Soviets Active in 1941????
Replies: 6
Views: 81

RE: WTH??? Soviets Active in 1941????

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: USS America<br/> <br/> You can also just not make use of any of the Soviet forces or bases as the Allied player.  Stand down air groups, etc.  You shouldn't need to restart as long as you can settle on a working solution. <e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE> <br/> <br/> Will th...
by Lanconic
Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:05 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Beta confusion
Replies: 1
Views: 55

Beta confusion

Ok I just got something labled 1061108p3

The problem is...I have no idea if that is the latest patch
and if not
what is
and where do you get the latest patch

please help
by Lanconic
Thu Oct 20, 2011 11:27 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: WTH??? Soviets Active in 1941????
Replies: 6
Views: 81

RE: WTH??? Soviets Active in 1941????

Playing AI

but because the Japs were doing stupid things, I went in to avert disasters

I did use head to head. I guess I should have used Computer allied player

Damn I hate staring over
by Lanconic
Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:08 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: WTH??? Soviets Active in 1941????
Replies: 6
Views: 81

WTH??? Soviets Active in 1941????

<t> I am playing the USN and I just noticed that the Soviets are active??????<br/> <br/> Is there any way to turn that off?<br/> <br/> I have a good game and it is just starting to 7/42<br/> and now I have a spectre of a restart???<br/> <br/> Does anyone know how to set it back to peace?<br/> </t>
by Lanconic
Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:52 pm
Forum: The War Room
Topic: Bombing of Chinese HI, Res, Oil?
Replies: 123
Views: 1464

RE: Bombing of Chinese HI, Res, Oil?

I think you all lose focus.....

You are at war. The purpose of war is to WIN. By whatever means possible.
That means that if bombing something hurts the enemy, you bomb it.
by Lanconic
Thu Aug 25, 2011 6:53 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Need comments - Pilots Jap
Replies: 13
Views: 122

Need comments - Pilots Jap

<t> I finally after much work etc etc<br/> <br/> Have one Jap airgroup that actually is elite.(Bomber Betty)<br/> <br/> 36 pilots and every one of them is over 85 exp.<br/> Some are over 95.<br/> <br/> The question is simple:<br/> <br/> In reality, I would disband the unit and force the pilots to go...
by Lanconic
Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:23 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Anemic Pearl Harbor Strikes
Replies: 55
Views: 643

RE: Anemic Pearl Harbor Strikes

It isnt just Pearl. Same thing happens at Manila. I got better results switching to bombs
by Lanconic
Tue Aug 23, 2011 10:01 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Midway
Replies: 93
Views: 634

RE: Midway

<t> What is the point of this thread? Why is 'Shattered Swords' being used as if it were a primary source?<br/> <br/> So what next year someone else will publish, yet another re-hash of Morrison, and be declared the latest<br/> prima donna? And of course unless we all run out to buy the buzz book, w...

Go to advanced search