<t> He left himself one bridge in the city.<br/>
<br/>
I don't have any of the new-fangled bridging engineers that pretty much auto-build a medium bridge, but I do have two coys of normal engineers that the manual says have a 20% chance/turn to knock up a light bridge, and so far as I can see they ...

<t> Ed, I'll be into the town outskirts by turn ten or eleven.<br/>
<br/>
All: I migrated to JTCS from WF/EF etc, and Ed's (Mr Roadrunner's) reply was a "wait...what?" moment......so my engineers can build bridges now? Any engineers? <br/>
<br/>
I had no idea.<br/>
<br/>
Jason: I'm at work and ...

<t> I'm in a middle of a very frustrating game of Defending the Dyle, playing as the Germans.<br/>
<br/>
If people take a look, they'll see there's a deep blue river (the Dyle), big victory point hexes on the Allied rear side, and plenty of Allied engineers. If the Allied player blows the bridges ...

<t> That's a very good point about the scenarios created for the old East Front I.....but to continue with my suggestion, that&nbsp;could be seen as&nbsp;even more reason to hard code the options into the scenario, to ensure that those scens get played with the NEW assault rules (as they more ...

<t> The point is that most of the old time scenarios are balanced (those intended for H2H anyway) with particular game-play expectations in mind....particularly time-wise.&nbsp; Any change to game mechanics will inevitably cause some imbalance.&nbsp; <br/>
&nbsp;<br/>
For that reason I think it ...

<t> It seems to me that even if the assault rules are made optional, there exists huge potential for confusion amongst players unfamiliar with the game mechanics history of CS and its scenarios.<br/>
<br/>
My suggestion is to wonder whether which set of assault and visibility rules is used might ...