Use them for constructin fortifications. Never ever disband them!! I usually keep every corps filled with two cons battalions, it speeds up construction very nicely.

Ur nickname tells everything. lol: "I WANT this and this for xmas present" Sorry, just had to say it.

<t> Thanks for all your effort for making best wwii operational game ever. I dont mind if witw is full priced or even more lol. The re playability and all things like that are even more than any casual mainstream games on market. Just take my money, i will love witw as much as wite i know it already ...

Sorry mate, already found one. Forgot to edit topic.

PM sent.

Already found.

Very nice and detailed AAR. I'm not myself big fan of playing against AI, but damn i liked your AAR. Very clear and nice effort you put on it.

Very good AAR. Keep it coming!

ORIGINAL: squatter

I think a lot of advice that comes in comes from players who haven't yet faced a strong German opponent.

Maybe your're right.

<t> Honestly, biggest problem in this situation is, that Larry doesn't just have any static line - Okay there's some kind of strong point around Moscow, but everything else is just remnants, whatever. <br/>
Biggest objective in first turns as Soviet Union is to build solid line all way from Lgrad ...

<r> Let me put some reference picture. Here's game im playing as soviets; It's turn 7 and look how stabile things are. Every front have its 'own' territory (see color codes) and they're very clear looking, and also i like to keep em historical lol. In this situation my supply works like charm. You ...

Alright. So im willing to take first challenge. I played and tried couple small scenarios against AI and got basic things working. I'm pretty experienced with TOAW (especially FiTE).

Send PM or mail me at = werryzz (at) hotmail (dot) com

Old fella Mr. Fulkerson, im interested about this game. Would you send me email or pm?

-D

I agree 100% with Panama with this. There is similiar system in many many many games (like John Tiller's Campaign series) and even in strategy boardgames.
I don't see any problem on it. Why it's so hard to agree? Maybe you are just lazy to bring it up on next TOAW. Lol [8|]

I'm saying this third time, but maybe some day TOAW 4 will get historical/realistic hierarchy system like in HOI3. It would be kick-ass.

Great. [8D] Send some PM to me and let me know your house rules... I like being historical too so no worries. LOL.

<t> MilRevKo. I'm very interested about starting new FitE multiplay game. I have one friend also who would team-up with me. So i suggest if we would play as Axis (little challenge) and you as Soviets, or if you got already friend ready, go ahead! <br/>
<br/>
3 players/side is wayyy too much, it ...

I haven't tried, but sounds exciting.. One guy commands like Army Group South and second one commands AG Center and north... Or something [8|] great idea.

If i'm not wrong, you can use all other rules but you can't use new supply rules & turn order thing.

Yep. Good thing, that you remain those there in your site. There will be always new readers [;)]