Solitaire: 5%
Head-to-head: 0%
AI: 75%
NetPlay: 20%
PBEM: 0%

<t> Not a delphi programmer, but..<br/>
<br/>
If still causing problems<br/>
1) try the release build without running from the IDE/debugger<br/>
2) make a minimal program that will reproduce the problem, eventually report it to vendor.<br/>
<br/>
Another guess could be some delphi libraries ...

<t> I only think one person in here said the game was broken. It would take a lot more than the ability of the USSR to 'stuff' to say that the game is broken.<br/>
<br/>
I have to say im being swayed back and forth on this subject.<br/>
<br/>
I think there have been many good arguments so far ...

<t> Have you considered the fact that one of the reasons the seal med. strategy / 42 barbarossa gets so much attention (as a strong axis play) could exactly be because of USSR ability to prevent the 41 war ?<br/>
<br/>
From a metagame analysis this basicly puts the 41 barb. as a risky strategy (on ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>For the situation of the Germans taking the Netherlands, Poland, and Yugoslavia all on the first turn with no losses ... just surrender your Allies and start over if you can't set up minors and the BEF well enough to prevent that. Hint: Defend Zagreb's flanks to the max and ...

<t> Im curiouse, have anyone done (or would do) an analysis where germany conquers Yugoslavia, Poland, Netherlands and aligns hungary and rumania in the first turn, and where france falls early-average (eg. MJ or JA), then aligns bulgaria in 41 ?<br/>
<br/>
I did aproximately this in my last game ...

Italy liberates baltic states ( Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia), so it can use them as another home country if italy gets counquered.

In our games we veto'ed it out as too gamey (so italy cannot liberate the baltic states).

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>The problem is that it does not help Russia to withstand a 41 Barb, which the German can now almost guarantee with this change, and nothing is done to offset that other than the earliest attack probably being in JA. <e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Without the rule it does ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Orm<br/>
<br/>
Maybe one solution could be to make an optional rule for different garrison values in regards to break neutrality pacts?<br/>
<br/>
Maybe something like this?<br/>
ART, AT, AA: 1<br/>
Other divisions: 0.5<br/>
MIL, GAR: 0.5<br/>
HQ-A, ARM ...

<t> In sommer of 40 hitler, at one point, wanted to start Barbarossa in the fall of 40, but this plan was rejected as "unrealistic".<br/>
<br/>
It is the only logical argument i can see why germany shouldn't be allowed to break the pact whenever it wants (ie. the german high command deeming it ...

<t> In reply to the OP:<br/>
<br/>
Thanks for a thorough analysis on the 'stuff' strat.<br/>
<br/>
Having not seen it in play where it mattered, i have some comments nevertheless.<br/>
<br/>
I would be a bit worried to base it on USSR play since the analysis of the german build plan takes some ...

You can read about the gameplay and mechanics here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_in_Flames without too much detail.

Thanks a lot !

Really appreciated.

<t> Our group are going to try the 2die10 table next game. I already printed one table only to find out it is not the latest (i think maybe far from).<br/>
<br/>
Which is the latest one (official or close to) released ?<br/>
<br/>
Do anyone know how or where to obtain the latest 2d10 land table ...

<t> I have considered creating the ukraine as Germany (current game)<br/>
<br/>
If you take enough ground quickly in ukraine, you may be able to get you hands on blue factories before they get railed away. You will get the blue factories intact when you create ukraine. My problem was I had already ...