Can be purchased from On Military Matters (OMM)

http://onmilitarymatters.com/pages/

Looks like 25 per CD.

It's a valuable resource, but with all sources it should be crossed checked with all your other sources.

<r> "What I'd be wanting most with regard to skirmishers/lights in the AWI is the option to initiate assault combat... "<br/>
<br/>
Definitely, especially considering Indians would be in this group, and we have historical evidence they closed for hand to scalp combat, from time to time. <SM sm ...

I don't know. Maybe they were going to set things up one way and then switched, but forgot to remove the old try. Just a guess.

Thanks Jackx.

I second your request to make the artillery effectiveness base customizable.

Try using the pontoon bridge from the sam menu you get the river hex, not the road hexes.

Okay, then I'm stumped, too. I hope someone who knows the engine better comes along and provides the correct answer.

<r> Oh, okay I undertand you.<br/>
<br/>
Put your bridge here.<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/32956/DA5DECBCA96E4DC19FA3AC4CE7DB87C3.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/32956/DA5DECBCA96E4DC19FA3AC4CE7DB87C3.jpg"><LINK_TEXT text ...

I'm sorry I do not understand your reply.

PH,

I bet you have to move your long bridge down one hex row. It looks to me as if you have the exit point going into water.

I do like the movement table with the 4/+10 ; 4/+25 ; etc.

Does anyone know the maximum character length for the NAME and UNIT TYPE fields in the unit display window?

<t> Jackx,<br/>
<br/>
Did not mean to upset you, nor for you to go into some long explanation. BTW, and no offence intended, your opinions in the first two paragraphs aren't shared by everyone. I believe your assumptions are incorrect. The game engine is much stronger than you are giving it credit ...

Okay thanks. [:)]

I thought it was a bug. Will that be fixed in the first patch?

<t> Jackx,<br/>
<br/>
No, no, no. No theory answers about, "since it's 15minutes then...."<br/>
<br/>
The time scale within a turn can be set to anything a scenario designer wants it to be. I'm inquiring if the game engine has a hard-coded modifier governing the fire of units that has moved. For ...

<t> They moved there by themselves during a turn.<br/>
<br/>
In situation one: Side B was conducting a multi-unit charge of three units. The charge path was three hexes wide. Two units hit companies opposite them, the third unit hit a leader. I had selected the units to charge past the targets ...

Okay, thanks. So there is no negative modifier for units that move before firing?

Play testing a small scenario today that I made, and the oddest thing. A Side B unit was able to occupy the same hex as a Side A leader, and then A Side A unit moved through a Side B leader. Any ideas?

Do units that fire after moving do so with the same effectiveness of those that fire in the first phase (and don't get to move during the turn)?

Did not see anything in the rules or editor screens about it.

Jackx,

The problem you mention is easily fixed by having the scenario designer dissolve units that hit 25% or lower, or some such low strength unit. Once the unit is down to mere cadre it would be combat ineffective anyway.

Swivels, and guns on fortress/naval carriages.