<t> Andy,<br/>
<br/>
I agree leader are going to be a pain. That said, Norman Scott should not be available. Not that his inclusion affects anything.<br/>
<br/>
One very odd thing. When using auto-selection of TF commanders I've periodically got some unusual commanders. Admiral Drake with a ...

Andy,

Most ship commands don't matter a lot, but CA (Ziggy) Sprague is a fairly useful leader.

He's listed as an admiral commanding PT-74. At this point he should be commanding the Wasp.

Again, no biggie.

And still more thanks.

<t> Good to hear Andy.<br/>
<br/>
Is the absence of the 5th Fleet HQ intentional? <br/>
<br/>
Geiger should be in command of the 3rd Amphib. (Yes, it's easy enough to put him in command, but he already had the job)<br/>
<br/>
I think the various HQs tasked for Saipan and Guam should have ...

<t> Incidentally I've been trying to track down the commanding officers of the major units.<br/>
<br/>
CVs:<br/>
<br/>
Yorktown: Jennings<br/>
Hornet: Sample<br/>
Wasp: Clifton Sprague<br/>
Bunker Hill: Jeter<br/>
Lexington: Litch<br/>
Enterprise: Gardner<br/>
Essex: Ofstie<br/>
<br ...

<r> Just in case those interested in doing scenario work weren't aware (I wasn't) you can get tabular records of movement for all of the Japanese cruisers at <URL url="http://www.combinedfleet.com/Junyokan.htm">http://www.combinedfleet.com/Junyokan.htm</URL> (And that means records of every known ...

<t> I agree with TR. The precise locations aren't that important.<br/>
<br/>
In addition to the Nik Mod and the old WITP start, there's also the new Coral Sea Scenario which gives us much of the deployment of active assets. <br/>
<br/>
We'll probably never get past educated guess in China but ...

<t> Hi Andy,<br/>
<br/>
It's possible that I've missed something but best I can tell Wasp II (CV-18) is missing. No doubt at all that the US is supposed to have 7 fleet carriers and I only count 6.<br/>
<br/>
Thanks for the scenario. A great place to learn the ins and outs of managing a big ...

I too am interested in the 1942 start (my preference for previous versions)&nbsp;