<t> I don't use a public beta version, So far I patched up only if the updater said I should, so it's probably official. The version I am playing with is 1.00.11 and the updater doesn't find a newer version (it's from April though).<br/>
<br/>
If it's fixed in 1.01.09B, I may patch it manually. It ...

<r> I am playing the 1941 campaign as Axis against the AI, just to get a feel of the new game mechanics.<br/>
<br/>
After a couple of turns, I tried to transfer an air group (I./KG 2) closer to the front. As target I chose a level 2 airbase, could be Lepel, but not sure. As it happens, the game ...

<t> Hotfix runs fine (still on XP), but I encountered a possible bug. I haven't seen it in 1.06.22, although I didn't play it for long, so take it with a grain of salt, it might have been already there.<br/>
<br/>
When I assign support units from higher HQs through the "ASSIGN/FORM" button in the ...

I used Kasperski (recurring license) for almost three years and man, am I happy that one day out of sheer anger I pulled the plug and got rid of it. It felt like a computer upgrade to double performance.

Thanks a lot! That's looking impressive indeed.

Pity I missed the picture, and now it's gone. What was it about? After some extended break I'm planning to start an AI game, and judging by the general reaction it's probably worthwhile to wait.

18) You apparently never had a Romanian construction unit sitting on a mountain pass and blocking the way for the Hungarian mobile corps. [;)]

<t> The RHG commands were responsible for the administration of the first couple of hundred km behind the front. RHG means "Rückwärtiges Heeresgebiet" (rear military area). They had the security divisions attached, but sometimes also regular divisions, which is impossible in the game, and ...

<t> The victory conditions throw the Germans a bone in the end. If you don't lose the land you started with by the end date of the scenario, you win. Despite the fact that it's really funny to imagine Stalin saying, oh, so we failed to win by autumn 1945, so lets stop the steamroller and let the ...

That aside, I'd prefer gimmicks allowing you to get to Stalino on turn 5 be taken out of the game. That has nothing to do with being creative, it's simply a gamebreaking flaw.

Can agree with that completely.

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Michael T<br/>
<br/>
Man you are stubborn. Do you know a HQ just left to its own devices in the rear will build up with fuel. Maybe not 1000 dumps. But several hundred, even without HQ BU. A player can move said HQ forward with its gas and other supplies and ...

<t> I'm not telling it's easy or convenient. I'm telling it's clearly not WAD. I'm not even calling for a nerf, I just see it coming, that an empty HQ won't get a flatrate of fuel and supplies anymore (that's the whole problem here), but only for the units directly attached. I don't care if you see ...

<t> German Corps had one or several "Arko" (Artillerie-Kommandeur), staffs to lead attached army artillery. They didn't have own troops, they led battalions attached to "Artillerie-Regiments-Stab", see below. They also typically had a "Korps-Nachrichten-Abteilung" (corps communication battalion ...

<t> Your settings mean, you want 3 of all support unit types (arty, anti-air, anti-tank, SP gun, rocket etc.) into every corps, 2 into every army and 1 into every army group. That some HQs received nothing has the reason, that there are simply not enough SUs of one or more particular types.<br ...

ORIGINAL: Michael T
Its not even worth the time to debate with people like you.

Yes, your precious time is better spent looking for a new exploit. Perhaps you find a few seconds to wave this one goodbye. [:D]

To be won, a combat needs at least 2:1 odds. The Germans have to achieve these odds by themselves, the Soviets only have to achieve 1:1 odds and get another 1 for free: (1+1):1.

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: MechFO<br/>
Moving 2000 Tons, 300 km from the railhead with a weeks notice, and then up to another 750 km away a week later, was not possible, period. Even more so without truly massive truck losses.<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
If we're riding the realism train ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Michael T<br/>
You must be joking right?<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Absolutely not.<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Michael T<br/>
What is abusive about a commander of the eastern front creating a supply dump, pulling a bunch of trucks and then moving ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Tarhunnas<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Michael T<br/>
Well what I do when 300+ miles from a railhead or port is get a a Pz HQ with no units attached back within range and HQBU it. It will have around 1000 fuel dumps and enough trucks to move them up to ...