<t> Enjoying your AAR. Took guts to just hang yourself out there. A suggestion to help those of us who aren't following super closely. <br/>
Its hard to tell what is going on (mostly which turn/impulse) when you say " the turn ends" I find myself wondering which turn. I suggest you put the ...

<r> Based on years of interaction with my wife (also a very smart lady) is that adopting assumption that she is right is nearly always correct...[:D] <br/>
<br/>
I don't see a real need to start or restore a different game during a netplay session. The utility of restoring a previous instance of ...

<t> In many cases you can 'work around' this issue. (I know that this is not optimal...) <br/>
<br/>
The existing UI will permit the following:<br/>
<br/>
Swapping from Hex A to B if C is available C needs to be adjacent to either A or B and C must have 'space'<br/>
<br/>
There are various ...

My understanding is that Emailing bug reports requires an actual email client. So if you use GMail or another web based service, a client is needed as well. During testing I have used Mozilla Thunderbird with Gmail which seems to work pretty well.

<t> Its a completely different animal. No where near as much micro detail as War in the Pacific, but still pretty huge. The scenarios are much more playable, particularly Barbarossa. This game very closely matches the board game experience IMO (Been beta testing since March & played the board game ...

<t> It is actually two different games:<br/>
Vrs AI you face MASSIVE USSR forces impossible to build as a player (about 10 times as strong as a human gets) PvP is unbalanced worse in the opposite direction USSR is weak as a kitten. Neither is 'historical' in any real sense.<br/>
<br/>
That said ...

<t> [:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@]<br/>
[:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@][:@]<br/>
<br/>
It wasn't the AI. It was Red Sn0w. By October 41 AI ...

I really wanted to like this game, but they are not done building it yet. Not even close.

I would like to play but the game is not quite ready for stable PBEM play IMO. It may be ready in a few months.

<t> I am interested in helping move this project to completion. And have time and a VERY flexible schedule.<br/>
<br/>
1. Any previous experience testing software. My relevant background is; experience determining requirements and developing those into working products at a large corporation for ...

<r> It was a critical port it was and was fortified and defended. Rather than take one of the major ports 'off the map' I recommend you handle it differently. As it was a very significant port it should be included. To handle play balance as well as historical accuracy issues perhaps fortification ...

<r> This has been posted elsewhere...<br/>
<br/>
Fix for air units stuck due to supply bug.<br/>
<br/>
In the consts.ini file (found in each scenario folder) change the following using a text editor:<br/>
from>>><br/>
[AirUnitsRebase]<br/>
SupplyToRebaseUnitType20 = 15<br ...

<r> I do agree this is a very good game, but of course with a few flaws. For example you can't actually 'achieve victory' as currently designed. Game doesn't end with surrender of Germany and Germany won't surrender if you still control some silly place like Narvik (like Gibraltar and Malta hold the ...

<r> Doom,<br/>
<br/>
I cannot replicate your issue (using 1.04). When I click on quick start the 1939 scenario is already highlighted. When I pick a country (I tried Axis and Allies and USSR) the game launched and started the 1939 scenario. I cannot 'not' select a campaign as one is already ...

<t> Sounds like a tough problem. Usually an uninstall clears all relevant registry entries. I know it sounds useless, but a re install, then another uninstall may clear it (the uninstall may have hung on a step.) It is not a high chance of success but it can't hurt. I notice you cannot install on a ...

<t> Re Italy:<br/>
This pretty much mirrored my experience vrs the AI. I would add that vrs a human Axis player moving in Italy would be MUCH more difficult (if possible at all) , particularly as the GE move first and could reinforce and re position more effectively. This does mirror the historical ...

<r> That's pretty much the result I got in Italy US and UK divisions did prove viable and useful there as well.<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: gwgardner<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Mark Clark<br/>
<br/>
So, for instance, in the GD scenario, the Americans have a two corps in ...

<t> Getting a fairly regular occurrence of a crash to desktop. The fleets.csv file is getting a 'bad row' or bad rows of data written to it. The AI is running both GE and USSR and it appears to be associated with AI fleet activity (just a guess) this happens every few turns and is resolved by ...

<t> Amph points go up in price (for each) the more you have (kind of a reverse economy of scale). I am not sure of the rationale (and not sure I agree with it) but I think they are trying to limit unrealistically large landings. Also you need to land foot infantry units (much cheaper than armor or ...

<r> I have to agree with Gary. It IS playable, but must add that some scenarios are way out of balance. Also divisions are not worthless they can be useful, you just can't attack with them (at least without some corps in the mix and they cannot stand up to a group of higher effectiveness corps with ...