Yeah being able to see hero or highly decorated units would be a huge help...speaking of which when is the patch coming??

Downloading the demo now...what is the difference (aside from the graphics quality) between this game and Combat Mission: Battles in Normandy?

Can I learn how to play this game without reading lengthy manual and how are units obtained? Do I buy them from a victory points pool or something.

Since America is a fictional campaign there should be no issue with making it longer somehow? Being able to play as the Allies would be nice too.

The AI have been doing this since People General (my first experience with this franchise). All I need to do is to present some tasty recon unit and it would roll armor out of artillery and AA cover for a bite.

So I'm a comie scum because I find the $40 price to be too steep?? Now I know why wargaming is a niche market.

Why does it matter which direction the sprites are facing? I would rather have an easy visual reference to tell me which units are core and which are scenario fodder.

Fortifications sprites that doesn't vanish from the map after being spotted would be a big deal too.

I have zero interest in a historical campaign, I worked my ass off beating back the Russian horde and my reward is the invasion of Berlin? You gotta be kidding me. But yes the war should've been longer. Success should be rewarded with more gameplay, not less.

<t> Having played this game for a few days I still struggle to justify the whopping $40 price. The gameplay is a virtual carbon copy of PG which is fine, but the graphics and quality hardly justify the price when you consider the fact that I brought Mount and Blade, which is another indie game for ...

<t> Is there a reason why this game cost so much? The graphics are terrible and the production value is a joke with static units that doesn't even have any animations what so ever! While I agree that gameplay is great, but this is game is a line by line remake of Panzer General. How hard can it be ...