<t> I think that you might miss a golden opportunity here. The (5=28)hex is 3 weak divisions, about 30000 men, 6 Ger infD plus tons of pioneer, would be 80000+, since it is a critical battle, it is worthwhile a good leader, and let 3 HQ participate to get more SU into combat, would be a sure win.<br ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: tyronec<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>It looks like there might be a golden opportunity to create a huge pocket around Penza. The right wing pincer goes in this order: 6 inf Ds easily dislodge the (5=28)hex, the panzer Ds drive through that hex, attack the retreat ...

<t> It looks like there might be a golden opportunity to create a huge pocket around Penza. The right wing pincer goes in this order: 6 inf Ds easily dislodge the (5=28)hex, the panzer Ds drive through that hex, attack the retreat troops and capture the 2 NW rough hexes, before Inf Ds and PzDs ...

<t> I have the same problem after upgrade my win10 to the newest versions, two computers have the same problem. it is a big pity as i often reload the save turns to reviw the games i have played, so I sincerely hope someone could help to fix the problem. It seems to me is caused by the Win10 ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Red Lancer<br/>
<br/>
That is not a decision in my gift but I very much doubt it given the scale of the game (unit size and turn time), the additional data required to set suitable crossing points, the risk of adding more bugs and the ability to teach the AI the ...

<t> Thanks for briefing the new game. Is it possible to add engineer units or engineer points which could build bridges over big rivers? In Wite 1.0, the mechanized troops cross the big river in a very unrealistic way, I would like to see that players could build big bridges over big rivers at ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: tyronec<br/>
<br/>
I have to disagree with what mktours writes.<br/>
While it is a huge job to develop the game it is not the same thing to implement a modification so not at all unreasonable that new patches can be worked out in a few weeks or months. It ...

<t> I think the biggest problem with the current patches is that the current patch team is doing something beyond their capacity. The original WiTe developer took 5 years to develop the WITE 1.0 before releasing, after that there were 5 years, in which some big changes were made, but the main ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist<br/>
<br/>
That are really sad news mktours.<br/>
The few AARs you did were very interesting and showed a different way to think WitE. Too bad they weren't continued to the end. A game you vs HLYA would have been the mach of the year <E>:)</E ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: morvael<br/>
<br/>
Unfortunately these numbers were virtual, hiding true losses behind a simple equation calculating losses as number of men in destroyed elements and half the men in damaged elements, while in fact no men were lost from damaged elements and only ...

<r> This is what used to be in 1.07, when the original developers were still taking care of the game.<br/>
After that, they leave it to some volunteers to freely do any changes they want. The combat engine has been heavily modified from the original one since then.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src ...

<t> Hardluckyetagain, I upgraded my game to 1.11, did some test and try to study the more than 50 pages of change log of the new versions. Unfortunately, I am afraid that such a game is not one which I am willing to spend tens of hours on. There are some issues concern me: <br/>
First, lacking of ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mktours<br/>
<br/>
Hi, Hardluckyetagain. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and strategy. I have some different ideas with you but I do agree and appreciate some other ideas of you.<br/>
I am ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: mktours<br/>
<br/>
Hi, Hardluckyetagain. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and strategy. I have some different ideas with you but I do agree and appreciate some other ideas of you.<br/>
I am ...

<t> Hi, Hardluckyetagain. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and strategy. I have some different ideas with you but I do agree and appreciate some other ideas of you.<br/>
I am interested in playing 2 campaigns against you, one as soviet and one as Axis. We could start the two campaign at the same ...

<r> I think you had made disastrous deployment here, the big nose of your line are almost certain to be cut off, and all the big corps are going to be lost eventually. <br/>
What is the point to hold the 1=86 hex, which is on the tip of the big nose? And to hold it, 10 more corps are cling to the ...

<r> I think it isn't likely for a weak side to stop a much stronger side by two layer of forts. the dilemma is, to keep the forts strong, you need to commit high CV troops, and then they are likely to be trapped. Not easy answers.
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: BrianG<br/>
<br/>
As for ...

<r> I agree with you that the Germany Pzs should be more useful in the south than in the north. <br/>
From my impression on your map, I doubt you could keep the dam from crack at some point.<br/>
I don't think your tank army is very useful as reserve troops in the north, and I think a better way ...

<t> some more comments:<br/>
I read your map carefully and my impression is that your troops in the whole north seems very weak in general. If that is true, then I am afraid that your don't have the power to do a massive duel like the Kursk campaign, then maybe you should consider trading space for ...

<r> I would disagree. I think you are inviting huge disaster on this front. The 50 Mp Germany Pzs could easily go through the Zoc to Zoc path to reach your rear area where you have no any reserve troops, As to your front line, it isn't difficult for the Germany troops to mass 2-1 initial CV to blow ...