Search found 51 matches

by MBot
Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:06 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [WAD + IMPR v1.11] Offensive Jammers Against ASM
Replies: 13
Views: 411

RE: Offensive Jammers Against ASM

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: kneecaps<br/>
<br/>
It's not an all or nothing situation. The usual situation is that a 'burn through' will eventually occur...<br/>
<br/>
Also a container ship is going to have a massive radar return, the container ship is also nearer the missile that the ...
by MBot
Tue Sep 29, 2015 3:52 pm
Forum: Command: Modern Operations series
Topic: Air strike missions in poor weather
Replies: 7
Views: 345

RE: Air strike missions in poor weather

<t> Interesting topic, I recently wondered about this myself.<br/>
<br/>
As a rule of thumb I would expect the following behavior if the attacker aircraft does not track the target by its own on-board sensors (visual, radar, FLIR, laser spot tracker):<br/>
-Stationary or moving target: target not ...
by MBot
Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:04 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [WAD + IMPR v1.11] Offensive Jammers Against ASM
Replies: 13
Views: 411

RE: Offensive Jammers Against ASM

<t> Here is a test scenario. Thanks for having a look.<br/>
<br/>
I think the stationary nature of the ships plays no role. In the editor you can move the target ship around and the ASM will immediately track it despite being jammed. What I would have expected is that the ASM change to HOJ and ...
by MBot
Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:14 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [WAD + IMPR v1.11] Offensive Jammers Against ASM
Replies: 13
Views: 411

RE: Offensive Jammers Against ASM

Yes, but the missile is striking its intended target at the right, a container ship, and not the jamming ship on the left. So radar guidance of the ASM seems to be unaffected despite being labeled as "jammed".
by MBot
Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:01 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [WAD + IMPR v1.11] Offensive Jammers Against ASM
Replies: 13
Views: 411

[WAD + IMPR v1.11] Offensive Jammers Against ASM

<r> What exactly is the application of ship-borne jammers? While the ASM's radar can be jammed, it can apparently track targets none the less.<br/>
<br/>
The screenshot below, two AS-4 are attacking a container ship (under EMCON). A Virginia CGN behind is jamming with OECM. Both ASM are marked as ...
by MBot
Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:29 pm
Forum: Mods and Scenarios
Topic: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Okhotsk Bastion
Replies: 3
Views: 149

New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Okhotsk Bastion

<t> This scenario is a follow up to my Kamchatka scenario, playable from the Soviet side. After the USN carrier raid on Petropavlovsk, the Soviet SSBN bastion in the Sea of Okhotsk is open to attack. The Red Banner Pacific Fleet must protect its strategic submarines.<br/>
<br/>
This scenario ...
by MBot
Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:09 pm
Forum: Mods and Scenarios
Topic: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka
Replies: 33
Views: 725

RE: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka

<t> First post is updated with another new version of the scenario.<br/>
<br/>
Changes:<br/>
-I made the Backfires a separate side with omniscient detection. The Backfire raid is now triggered solely after a random amount of time regardless of recon. This change became reasonable after I played ...
by MBot
Thu Sep 17, 2015 11:01 am
Forum: Mods and Scenarios
Topic: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka
Replies: 33
Views: 725

RE: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka

<t> The question of how the Soviets envisioned to find targets with aircraft actually leaves me puzzeled. Playing it out in CMNAO suggests that it would have been very easy to destroy recon aircraft before they are within range of a CVBG to detect it with radar. Sure, the presence of radiating E-2 ...
by MBot
Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:24 am
Forum: Mods and Scenarios
Topic: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka
Replies: 33
Views: 725

RE: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka

<t> I am glad the subs are working better now but your Backfires seem cursed. Since you were attacked by submarines, your ships must have been detected. I wonder why this didn't trigger the strike. I tested this twice yesterday by completely removing the patrol aircraft and each time the subs ...
by MBot
Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:53 pm
Forum: Mods and Scenarios
Topic: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka
Replies: 33
Views: 725

RE: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka

<r> Thanks again for all the feedback and suggestions. I made some adjustments and updated the scenario in the first post.<br/>
<br/>
-I found a mistake by me that actually prevented all subs from opening fire. I was under the impression that units would assume the ROE of a mission when it was ...
by MBot
Mon Sep 14, 2015 6:20 pm
Forum: Mods and Scenarios
Topic: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka
Replies: 33
Views: 725

RE: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: AlexGGGG<br/>
<br/>
MBot, <br/>
<br/>
When I was playing, it at least looked like the Backfires came near the range to shoot at me, but turned bingo fuel just before the range. I'm not sure if it is possible, but maybe you can set the mission so that they do ...
by MBot
Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:27 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Walleye Sensor
Replies: 2
Views: 126

Walleye Sensor

<t> I am not sure if this is a bug or feature, but I will add it here for consideration. The AGM-62B Walleye II ER/DL has apparently an EO seeker, but it can still attack targets at night and ground fog (which despite datalink should prevent an optical target lock).<br/>
<br/>
Also in the Database ...
by MBot
Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:56 am
Forum: Mods and Scenarios
Topic: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka
Replies: 33
Views: 725

RE: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: wild_Willie2<br/>
<br/>
Hi, I played the scenario until I destroyed all subs and its a good scenario with plenty of potential but am I missing something or has the trigger for the Backfire strike not been put in?<br/>
<br/>
I intercepted all Bears before they ...
by MBot
Mon Sep 14, 2015 4:29 am
Forum: Mods and Scenarios
Topic: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka
Replies: 33
Views: 725

RE: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: hellfish6<br/>
Are the "Add Counter Subs" and "Subtract Counter Subs" events supposed to be firing constantly?
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Yes, as mentioned above this was the only way I could make a "no unit in area" event make to work. One of the scenario ...
by MBot
Sun Sep 13, 2015 6:02 pm
Forum: Mods and Scenarios
Topic: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka
Replies: 33
Views: 725

RE: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka

There are about 1.5 times as much randomly placed biologics are there are submarines. Are false contacts any different than biologics?
by MBot
Sun Sep 13, 2015 11:23 am
Forum: Mods and Scenarios
Topic: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka
Replies: 33
Views: 725

RE: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka

It is also about subs leaving the area. So the trigger has to detect "no more subs in area" rather than "x subs destroyed".
by MBot
Sun Sep 13, 2015 10:27 am
Forum: Mods and Scenarios
Topic: New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka
Replies: 33
Views: 725

New Scenario for Testing: World War 85 - Kamchatka

<r> This is my first scenario for CMANO. The Carl Vinson and Kitty Hawk CVBGs are moving in on Kamchatka to strike the submarine facilities at Petropavlovsk. I selected the year 1985 to have more emphasis on fleet air defence, ASW and strike operations and less on fighter air combat. The scenario is ...
by MBot
Sun Aug 16, 2015 3:08 pm
Forum: After Action Report
Topic: Post your hero unit pics here
Replies: 13
Views: 445

RE: Post your hero unit pics here

<r> How the hell did that happen <E>:)</E><br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/47843/8D583C9FF2DF4D0B95768F0BFF7A6269.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/47843/8D583C9FF2DF4D0B95768F0BFF7A6269.jpg"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www ...
by MBot
Sun Aug 16, 2015 3:07 pm
Forum: After Action Report
Topic: Post your hero unit pics here
Replies: 13
Views: 445

RE: Post your hero unit pics here

<r> Top scorer of the battle. All enemy tanks were T-80B1.<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/47843/64DFDCED52DA4DFA9211523BEB18AE18.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/47843/64DFDCED52DA4DFA9211523BEB18AE18.jpg"><LINK_TEXT text="https ...
by MBot
Sun Aug 16, 2015 3:06 pm
Forum: After Action Report
Topic: Post your hero unit pics here
Replies: 13
Views: 445

RE: Post your hero unit pics here

<r> Lot's of killing.<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/47843/9AF7B60C0AE742C695D29F5E5C56CA9A.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/47843/9AF7B60C0AE742C695D29F5E5C56CA9A.jpg"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ...

Go to advanced search