Search found 15 matches

by Dragunov
Wed May 28, 2014 8:49 am
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [FIXED] Altitude issue
Replies: 1
Views: 145

[FIXED] Altitude issue

In this scenario there is an AEW mission. An aircraft which starts to fly the AEW mission will stay on low altitude.
by Dragunov
Wed May 28, 2014 8:44 am
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Refuel issue
Replies: 0
Views: 172

Refuel issue

There is a problem with the refueling.

Two F-14 are low on fuel but they refuse to refuel. Instead they fly back to their base.
by Dragunov
Sat May 10, 2014 9:51 am
Forum: Command: Modern Operations series
Topic: Air combat rework
Replies: 89
Views: 3521

RE: Air combat rework

Thank you.

I look forward to the new version.
by Dragunov
Sat May 10, 2014 7:46 am
Forum: Command: Modern Operations series
Topic: Air combat rework
Replies: 89
Views: 3521

RE: Air combat rework

<t> I bought this game because i am interested in realism. But i loose interest in it if my good sense says that something is not accurate. Four Tomcats with 16 Phoenix, 8 Sparrows and 8 Sidewinders vs. 12 Tu-22M3 and sometimes only 1 or 2 Bombers will be shot down (randomness is too high). The ...
by Dragunov
Thu May 01, 2014 2:40 pm
Forum: Command: Modern Operations series
Topic: Air combat rework
Replies: 89
Views: 3521

Air combat rework

<t> I think the air combat, or parts of it, urgently needs some rework. I mostly play 1980s scenarios either on Soviet or US side.<br/>
<br/>
Following situations:<br/>
<br/>
1.<br/>
<br/>
12 Backfires approach a CVBG and 2 Tomcats intercepts them. The Tomcats launch 8 AIM-54C from a range of ...
by Dragunov
Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:01 am
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Some issues
Replies: 11
Views: 428

RE: Some issues

Here is a picture of the attack.
by Dragunov
Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:58 am
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Some issues
Replies: 11
Views: 428

RE: Some issues

In this scenario the Kuznetsov will be engaged by several A-6 equipped with GBU-10.

The bombs fly towards the carrier and they impact when their horizontal range to the target reaches zero. Their altitude at that moment is still over 6000 m.
by Dragunov
Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:59 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Some issues
Replies: 11
Views: 428

RE: Some issues

<r> Hi,<br/>
<br/>
yes i enabled detailed gun fire control. Now i disabled it and the hit chances are correct. Thank you.<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Interesting case. In this predicament each of the CIWS mounts should have taken a shot at a different incoming Harpoon instead of ganging-up ...
by Dragunov
Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:05 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Some issues
Replies: 11
Views: 428

RE: Some issues

The S-3A Vikings are on an ASW mission. Speed is set to loiter and altitude to 305 m. The planes ignore the set altitude after some time. When the Throttle & Altitude setting window is open, the altitude will be changed to the set value until the window is closed again.
by Dragunov
Fri Apr 11, 2014 12:57 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Some issues
Replies: 11
Views: 428

RE: Some issues

<t> 05.04.1989 10:05:13: Gun (20mm/85 Mk15 Phalanx Blk 0 Burst [200 rnds]) is attacking AS-4 Kitchen A Mod 3 [Kh-22N ASM] #391 with a base PH of 70%. Final PH: 70%. Die Roll: 10 - HIT<br/>
<br/>
05.04.1989 10:05:13: Gun (20mm/85 Mk15 Phalanx Blk 0 Burst [200 rnds]) is attacking AS-4 Kitchen A Mod ...
by Dragunov
Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:22 am
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Some issues
Replies: 11
Views: 428

Some issues

<t> Hi,<br/>
<br/>
i think i found several problems:<br/>
<br/>
-the hit chance of CIWS against ASM is differing, some CIWS (some Phalanx versions, CADS-N-1) have a hit chance of 20-30% and other CIWS (other Phalanx versions for example) have a hit chance of 70 or more percent. I noticed this ...
by Dragunov
Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:30 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [NON-ISSUE] Radar cone / Fighter radar
Replies: 24
Views: 706

RE: Radar cone / Fighter radar

<t> I did a lot of testing with F-14B with AIM-54C missiles vs Tu-22M2, Tu-22M3, AS-4 and Shipwreck missiles now.<br/>
<br/>
In my opinion the kill chance against the Tu-22 is much to low. Sometimes when i started the engagement from 110-120 nm not one of the four Phoenix hit the target. The hit ...
by Dragunov
Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:38 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [NON-ISSUE] Radar cone / Fighter radar
Replies: 24
Views: 706

RE: Radar cone / Fighter radar

<r> Thank you for your answers.<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Further into the future we'll improve the AI by allowing the fighters to tilt their 40-deg scan arcs sideways up to the 65 deg max after weapon launch, and in some cases even climb to lose speed, so that they reduce their closure rate by ...
by Dragunov
Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:02 am
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [NON-ISSUE] Radar cone / Fighter radar
Replies: 24
Views: 706

RE: Radar cone / Fighter radar

<t> Thanks your for your answer.<br/>
<br/>
I think arc search controls the missile because everytime i start a Phoenix and the Tomcat changes the course the missle goes blind. If arc engage would be used it would not occur.<br/>
<br/>
I still think that the radars of fighter aircraft should get ...
by Dragunov
Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:42 am
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: [NON-ISSUE] Radar cone / Fighter radar
Replies: 24
Views: 706

[NON-ISSUE] Radar cone / Fighter radar

<t> Hi,<br/>
<br/>
i think the radar cone of fighter aircraft is too narrow. It should be increased to 60 degree or more.<br/>
<br/>
With one radar sweep real fighters cover much more than what is modelled in the simulation.<br/>
<br/>
It would also help to prevent that missiles become blind ...

Go to advanced search