This is correct. The F-104G is not capable of in-flight refueling. On the other hand, USAF F-104Cs (and CF-104s) did have a refuelling probe. The scenario designer could perhaps replace the -Gs with some -Cs (although I doubt the Scimitar was ever cleared to AAR the F-104)?

Another thing is the ...

<t> Considering that the NI campaign was released for CMANO back in 2015, my question is if it has been tested in the most recent version of CMO. I encountered another possible problem in the scenario preceding Fox Two <br/>
(there's a separate topic for this).<br/>
<br/>
And yes, it is always ...

<t> Thank you for the reply. You are absolutely correct. I had already managed to down all Tu-95s long before they could achieve a radar contact with the Task Force. Same applies to the AGIs, they had all been identified and sunk very early in the game with rockets and Mk82s. Active emissions were ...

<t> I'm having a hard time completing this scenario. First off, side briefing is misleading. The first paragraph mentions that "there are no strike aircraft on Iceland at present" and that "submarine threat is the main problem". Intel on enemy forces, however, suggests that some Tu-22M Backfires ...

<t> Not sure if this is related to the original post but SOSUS was eventually able to get a fairly good fix on K-387. The sub is (reportedly) doing 5kts at a depth of 131ft but none of my active sensors (active buoys or dipping sonar) will pick it up. In all cases the predicted location of the sub ...

<t> I decided to fire up Northern Inferno once again in CMO (had completed this before in CMANO) just to see the evolution of certain game mechanics and although the sonar/sound propagation model seems to be more realistic as it is now much harder to detect enemy submarines, there is something odd ...

<t> Hi Dimitris,<br/>
<br/>
Further to Ancalagon's posts, another idea would be to limit the maximum descent during evasive action to e.g. 20,000 ft below mission altitude. So for aircraft flying CAP at 25,000 ft the “hard deck” for evasive action (or probably even dogfighting in general) would be ...

<t> This one has been bothering me for some time now. It appears that during air to air engagements, aircraft follow a specific pattern regardless of their individual characteristics. <br/>
<br/>
The typical sequence I’ve observed (the latest scenario I’ve been playing is “Caribbean Fury – Hot ...

<t> Thanks for the prompt reply guys (mikmyk: aren't you supposed to be on a break? [:)])<br/>
<br/>
Tomcat84: you are absolutely correct about auto engaging targets or setting up patrol zones, etc. (I am aware of how these work). The point I was trying to make is that when the AI is firing a SARH ...

<t> While experimenting with the new features in BVR and WVR combat mechanics I noticed a few potential problems with BVR engagements. More specifically;<br/>
<br/>
Case 1<br/>
WCS, air: (Tight) <br/>
WRA: (Default) <br/>
Other relevant options: Ignore plotted course: (Yes)<br/>
<br ...

<t> Another thing that I noticed (in my original post I forgot to mention that I'm referring to B570) is that one of my E-1B Tracers was able to pick up a submarine running on the surface some 123 nm away. Is this intentional? This sub may be a large one (SSGN?) but is the AN/APS-82 really that ...

<t> While playing the “Out of Megiddo” scenario (well written scenario btw) I noticed some odd things about B570 that I thought I should report. <br/>
<br/>
First off, the A-6A seems to be lacking a proper EW suite. Though I didn’t have time to thoroughly investigate this, a quick look at some of ...