Dimitris wrote: Thu Nov 02, 2023 11:00 am Also, this pair of slides is from our most recent CUE:

Is it just me or does the images not load on this page?

I think the plan for China is to fire dozens at one CVBG. I am pretty sure the plan is overwhelm any defense.


Which would work the first time, but after that the USN would adapt and deny China any info on the location of their fleets. In that way it is a on-hit-wonder, it works well in the grey ...

I did some testing to get some CMO stats to support my previous argument that target info is a crucial part of the success of an ASBM strike.

The range at which a Gerald R. Ford class carrier can be detected by the two main chinese AWACS (that I am aware of) at about (give and take a few nm):
KJ ...

This is going to be a bit of an essay I apologize for that, but I have been thinking a lot about this before.

My 50 cents would be that regardless of how good the ASBMs are, you cannot hit what you cannot see. Using fighters from islands together with tankers and fighters from aircraft carriers, US ...

Hi, a fix for this issue is being worked on.
It was probably wrongfully marked as fixed before but the fix was not in line with our expectations and didn't cover all the cases.

I recently also noticed this issue and I am glad to see that it is being worked on!

<t> I can report that the same issue exist for SA-26 [42S6 Morfey] and SA-17 Grizzly [9K37M1-2 Buk-M1-2]. The database fix that was mentioned probably fixed all related datalink issues, but in case it doesn't I just wanted to let you now that there are more than one unit with this problem.<br/>
<br ...

Of me playing a game which combined commands game engine and wargame red dragons graphics engine. It was glorious. That's all I wanted to say.

Please delete me.

<r> This was exactly what the article in JFQ issue 57 talked about, I just wasn't able to put it into words <E>:)</E><br/>
<br/>
With the use of different band radars from different angles you can get all the info you need, including height which is usually hard to get with VHF, to guide a missile ...

<t> I actually just read an article from Joint Force Quarterly (a US Army magazine) where argued that the F-35 might actually not be a very capable to breach modern air defences despite it's stealthiness. The reason is that with new Russian and Chinese Radar using long wave-length radars like VHF, L ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Pergite!<br/>
As a swede I would be more bothered by that the system never went into service. I have no clue on where the start year 2010 in the db comes from. Great missile though.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Yeah I noticed that, there is actually one ...

Oh and I also noticed that each Launcher only have 4 missiles, while they actually have 6 per launcher. This info can also be found on SAAB page for RBS 23 Bamse.

<t> So I just noticed a minor error in the database for RBS 23 Bamse. It has a IR seeker on it, while in real life it is Automatic Command to Line of Sight (ACLOS) or perhaps SARH (Semi-active Radar homing) I found this information on the designers (SAAB) page about the missile system and wikipedia ...

Yupp weather was my problem, there where clouds at 2-4km over the units and heavy rain, removing that and now it's hard to loose track of the tanks

Thanks for the help!

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: MR_BURNS2<br/>
<br/>
You don't need to turn it on, and try lower altitudes. Could there be any weather issues, clouds?
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
I used a UAV earlier and that one had to fly at 610m tops to find it and then it was 0,2nm from it. Yes I do ...

<t> Hello! This is my first time here on the forum and I just want to start of by saying I love this game.<br/>
<br/>
Now to my issue I have some issues getting my JAS-39D to use it's Recon Pod. I have assigned it the SPK-39 Recon Pod Loadout and set it to loop inside a support mission where there ...