Using the latest update, the subs in this scenario seem to be stuck near the surface, like S316.

In the attached saved game, the mission "gitmo land patrol" has blanks for speed of ground units and I cannot set a speed. Thus, most of the assigned ground units won't move. Using the latest update.

I changed the depth to shallow and the sub started behaving fine. Then I set it to below layer and the sub behaved fine. Then I reset it back to its original depth of above layer and now the sub behaves fine. So this issue is fixed.

In the attached saved game, S603 is constantly changing depth for no reason in deep water. However, the other subs behave just fine. I'm using 1147.14. I have no idea why?

I ran the scenario some more. S603 is in deep water and keeps changing it depth. I'm using the latest update 1147.14. I tried turning off auto evasion with no change in behavior.

I'm sorry, I gave the wrong sub in my post. The Sub 603 Casablanca is on a plotted course and keeps varying its depth despite the order to be just above the layer.

I'm playing a scenario, attached, in which my sub Suffren on a plotted course keeps changing it depth. It is not attacking or evading anything.

<t> The Pentagon claims that the B-2 can penetrate an opponent's airspace unaided by escort aircraft (not including tankers). The Pentagon, and the author that I mentioned in by OP, claim that B-2s and F-117's penetrated Iraq airspace to Baghdad without any escort. I don't know if these claims are ...

<t> When I wrote "assistance," I was referring to sead or fighter support, not tanker, sorry. The one F-117 lost over Serbia was due to mechanical issues according to the official Pentagon report. I'm not sure that SAM radar, or other search radar, can detect stealth aircraft as easily as they do in ...

<t> I recently read a book about the US invasion of Iraq in 2003 titled "Road to Baghdad" by Ross Simpson. The author notes that both F-117 and B-2 aircraft bombed downtown Baghdad without any escort or other pre-mission assistance. However, in CMO these aircraft are not able to reach such targets ...

The ammo facility.

<t> 1142 is still recent. I haven't played CMO much for a few months. Try a version early in the year when CMO first came out. I have grouped several SAM Facilities added a ammo facility and added magazines to the group using the scenario editor in both CMANO and CMO. However, it has been some time ...

<t> It's not a feature request. Before the latest update, the add magazine button would show and work for any group of land facilities that had an ammo facility. Now if the group has a SAM facility with an ammo facility the add magazine button does not show after clicking the magazine button for the ...

I beg to differ. I can add magazines to groups of land facilities without a SAM facility if it has an ammo facility. I should be able to add a magazine to any group of facilities that have an ammo facility. Ships are different. You're correct about groups of ships.

<t> Using the scenario editor, I can add magazines to any group unless it has a SAM facility, then the add magazine button does not show. In the attached saved game, switch to the Rus side and try to add a magazine to the group of SAM sites that I created or the airbase to which I attached some SAM ...

<t> I found the problem. You can add magazines to any airbase. However, when you group facilities (sam sites) like I have on the Russian side in the attached game, you cannot add magazines to the group of facilities because the add magazine button doesn't show. Use the scenario editor, switch to the ...

Now it's working and I can see the add magazine button. Go figure. Resolved.

The problem is that the add magazine button does not show.

All of them using the 1147.2 update. I can add weapons, but not magazines.

Using the latest update, I can't add a magazine to a facility using the scenario editor. Saved game attached.