I just bought the game. Immediately, I noticed some odd behavior when giving orders. The orders are being given to other units. Much like if you double click a HQ unit and it gives the HQ commands to his sub units. This really messes up the game as you have to go back and check every unit.

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: FroBodine<br/>
<br/>
There are many problems with the game, that you don't mention at all. Read this review . . . lots of screenshots and descriptions of poor A.I., strange behavior, and downright bugs.<br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
OUCH....Le Bocage ...

Did you use an online translator?

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Rosseau<br/>
<br/>
Thank you, gentlemen. This looks pretty darn good, and with scenario editor intact, my doubts have been assuaged. I also count 17 units in Zak's screenshot, which is just about perfect for the micro required. Combat Mission 2x is great, but ...

<t> I feel the game is only playable by adjusting the camera. I want to be down in the weeds. And have some terrain comprehension. The topo-info is a win.<br/>
<br/>
Also, the list of units on the top left is not ideal. Maybe across the top of the screen horizontally, and move that victory slider ...

<t> That date would indicate a very early pzgr 39. In other words, it would be used by the initial batch of StuGs with the L43 barrel. It would be nice to find the Merkblatt that goes with it. I think the only one we have seen is the Oct 44 Merkblatt that calls out 2.5 Kg powder. I am thinking that ...

<t> The 'powder bag', that is the silk bag that is inside the cartridge that holds the powder, also has info printed on it. As an example, a 75mmL48 bag...<br/>
<br/>
7.5 cm StuK 40<br/>
7.5cm KWK 40<br/>
2.51 Kg<br/>
Digl RP....etc<br/>
ktz 1943/27<br/>
Son 23.6.44<br/>
<br/>
This calls ...

<t> I believe that is also in your post 23 in this thread? I think that there is a mistake in that the AP40 has the same powderweight as the AP39. It looks hand drawn by the way.<br/>
<br/>
Most sources say that the powder weight on the Pak40 AP39 is 2.75 Kg. It's about the same as a 88mm Tiger I ...

That also looks like a Navy Report. I guess they copied.

I have seen shell casing marking that are in that lower range. The artificial silk 'sacks' that held the propellant, also had info including date of manufacture (month)

<t> Handbook of Enemy Ammunition: Italian Fuzes, Gaines, Shell, etc., Shell ...<br/>
By The War Office, 1943<br/>
<br/>
This document shows the PAK40 powder being 2.75 Kg. Interestingly enough, the KWK40 cartridge is just 2.16 Kg. The explanation for this, not known apparently to the authors, is ...

<r> October 44 report at Lone Sentry...<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>"A.P.C.B.C. May Become Most-Used German Pak 40 Ammunition" from Tactical and Technical Trends<br/>
An intelligence report on German Pak 40 antitank ammunition in WWII, from Tactical and Technical Trends, No. 51, October 1944.<br ...

<r> I can't post links or pics it seems.<br/>
<br/>
But, it seems that 2.5 Kg (I have seen 2.51 Kg also), is a late war model. That info you posted is from Oct. 44. If anything, 2.43 (or 2.41Kg) is an earlier model. I can not see the Germans reducing the charge past Oct 44???? If anything, it ...

<r> I reread this post at another forum discussing this same topic...<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>by M. » 27 Apr 2006, 16:48<br/>
<br/>
That's a wrong approach. <br/>
<br/>
The 7.5 cm Pzgr. Patr. 39 Pak 40 had as propellant 2,75 kg Digl.R.P. –G 1– (625·3,8/1,3) + 20 g Nz.Man.N.P. (1,5·1,5 ...

Test, I am back. had to change the name.