Hi, why was thedoctorking banned from the forums? I wasn't an active member recently (guess why?) but what is happening in this community is sad and is getting sadder. I do not think that thedoctorking has violated any of the forum rules in this thread.

The snake like attacks have their uses - they make the soviets retreat faster than they would normally do. So if you intend to get terrain instead of focusing on encirclement thats they way to go. But getting cut off at the base of the thrust is a capital punishment material!

I never really liked Pavlov due to his atrocious morale rating. But its always better to have him around as an option

The software used to record stuff for youtube purpose (OBS for example) has inbuilt drawing toolbox as well.

<t> Sappers were once THE choice, but I dont know how do they look nowadays 1942+. The devs stated in the patches that sappers regain their combat engineer traits later in the game, so it might be an option, i just have no data in this regard. Motorcycle regiments are interesting choice, quite pricy ...

Hey, I know this screen

<t> Its a game man, not a simulator/visual novel, you wont find here 100% historical accuracy. Reading the manual (especially the new one provided by Chris) is a great way into the game, otherwise you will be walking around in the dark, this game has a lot of obscure concepts that are super hard to ...

Doesnt the EXP weigh the same in CV rolls as morale?

<t> I dont like prohibiting AGC units to go south, as it takes one of the few strategic tools the Germans have in their pocket. You could just agree in a set of houserules which pockets in the South are allowed to be created (Rovno, Kovel, Lvov, Proskurov etc.)<br/>
I believe under current rules ...

I am up for the Soviet side

Misunderstood - post deleted [>:]

Hopefully also the national reserve fatigue bug?

Be wary, the fatigue recovery in the National Reserve is bugged in the current version (1.11.03) and is not effective (only one point per turn).

<t> But there is the issue, foot infantry has to transport all its artillery, baggage trains, support units etc. as well - they are all horse drawn. They cant be transported in rubber dinghys. The bridge (probably multiples of) has to be built regardless if the unit is motorised or not. And once the ...

My post appeared to be super confusing [:D] in-game tanks and mot inf have debuffs while "foot" infantry has not. My question was why does the mot inf has the debuffs, because in my opinion it shouldnt have. Sorry for the confusion [:D]

So why normal inf division have an easy time crossing it comparing to the motorized? In my post i wanted to emphasize the difference between regular and motorized inf - why it is so big? Not talking about absolute MP numbers, they are and will be always arbitrary.

<t> It is very prohibitive. In history they fought over the rivers but do we know how many MP's they used by doing so? [:D]<br/>
<br/>
On the other hand, im unsure why motorized infantry has penalties fighting over rivers, its gonna establish the bridgehead just like a normal inf div would - and ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain<br/>
<br/>
Come on, someone is really trying to keep the Soviet player down or is this a cruel joke.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
You are doing well enough, Stalin is not afraid of losing Moscow, he fears for his datcha (summer house) on ...

<r> Welcome to the forums Zug <E>:)</E><br/>
<br/>
If you are past Moscow mid-September then you have nothing to fear in winter <E>:)</E> <br/>
As to the digging, units generally dig themselves (their fort level will rise every turn) - you dont need to create fortified zones to help them. You can ...

Xerxes likes this.