<r> In my recent game, maybe I found a bug.<br/>
We are in early 1942. US and GB transport PP for USSR, but soviets lost are they MM due sub attacks. Now then are on -10, even, if US, and GB transports are sunk. US/GB MM numbers don't drop, remains the same, only soviets lose.<br/>
<br/>
<br ...

Allied DoW, with no restrictions shoud be solved in some way. Just imagine, when France invade Norway around T03, if the german not take care of it.

Oh, with unlimited air strike, and bleed out your MM, britain's fate will come to and end. In 1941 of course. I belive without 41 Barbarossa, Brittain will fall, before US, and the soviets enter.

Indeed.

Maybe it's better to attack, but I was curious about that timeline. Capture the British isles and prepare against US-USSR invasion.
A very interesting scenario. Next time, I'll try it.

Invading Russia need huge forces. At least 10 armour, 30 infantry corps. Axis minor not really count, max as garrison, when germans move inside. A bad invasion just gives the nextra experience, and took Germany away to finish off the brits.

<t> Lille was taken on Turn 06, during very early clear turn, so -25 PP for France. Turn four was also a clear, that was Belgiums conquest. <br/>
<br/>
But tyronec, I was in a really bad shape! <br/>
<br/>
You destroyed four german infantry corps, and several other where badly beaten. Italian ...

Oh... never realized armours need more landing ships.
However the cost is still to low, and build time still. Doubling those numbers could solve the hasty invasion question. But that's just an opinion.

it costs 25% of land forces to invade about.

I don't understand. Landing ships cost 15 PP/10 unit. So a full german corps (30 strong corps) need 45 PP, for 30 landing ship.

<t> Use less oil based units. Try not to use navy, for no reason. Battleships eat a lot, so mostly keep them in port. <br/>
Focus on Mediterranean, and Asia theatre capturing Iraq and Iran. And always keep your eyes on fuel gauge. Stockpile, stockpile, and stockpile.<br/>
Oil is the biggest ...

<t> This game is great. I love the land aspect, and I'm fine with the naval one. Ships need to move, not just rest into ports. <br/>
However, the invasions are too cheap. Maybe 30 PP, instead of 15, and longer build time, could give the much needed balance. Because right now, it's easy, and useful ...

As Almeron puts it there are exploits here and there, like any game

One turn Denmark is far to be called as an exploit. Just a simple detach in a good position.

<t> Taking Denmark is easy. You need only one german corps. One turn conquest.<br/>
Place one german corps to the closest hex in North Germany. DoW, and move two hex, closing up to Copenhagen. Than detach a division. The division is alway detached closest to the capital.<br/>
The new 20 strength ...

<t> Any side, long run, historical type game, where we try to avoid ripping the game system, for success.<br/>
That means, some house rules I wish to be agreed:<br/>
<br/>
1. No german attack on Belgium, Luxembourg, and Holland in 1939 (Denmark, or Norway is allowed)<br/>
<br/>
2. Soviet side ...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>On the weather I do not really agree - it ought to be random.<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
In 1939, weather has the biggest impact. France and Britain can't handle it, if two clear weather hits. One is Belgium, second is Lille (what worth 25 PP), and deep attack in France ...

Check you trade panel. You will see that all Romanias oil is transported to Germany, just like half of her PP.

<t> I finished my last game against a decent player (DicedT), but I beat him/her badly. The main reason was two clear turn in a row. Of course in 1939 october (just for fun), what lead into fall of France in early 1940 (around turn 18-19) <br/>
We can call it bad luck, but it's more close to call ...

The new one.

<r> When France falls (and Syria was guarded by three british division), after the armistice, the following happens:<br/>
British units teleported to the closest controlled hex, and now Syria has no owner, can't be entered, declare war, or anything.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Michael T<br/>
<br/>
Reducing Manpower is a good idea. Maybe even more of a reduction is needed. But lets try 25% first.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
I belive there shoud be a PvP campaign, and player vs AI one. 25 % drop on manpower is a big issue, when we ...