I am not sure if this helps, but having never noticed a difference either, I did start in designing scenarios and using both, and unchecking the "auto-detected_ box for the camouflaged ones.

<t> Seriously, if you watch a TV ad for a new vehicle, and go purchase the vehicle thinking that you also should get the hot model that was sitting on the hood in the commercial, it is about the same thing here. Not sure how a ***product*** mentioned AS a product multiple times, even in the original ...

As thewood1 says, repairs are made over time...

<t> Once the missile is fired, it will not care about friend or foe, but will engage whatever target it "sees" on activation. That is a real-world issue as well, and the only way to avoid it really is to not take the shot until there is no neutrals in the area. Sometimes that is an unacceptable wait ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Lukew<br/>
<br/>
Interesting looking scenario which I have only just started to play. However, for me personally a two week long scenario is perhaps a bit too long for my tastes. Perhaps limit it to the first 2 - 4 days or a week at maximum.<br/>
<br/>
I have ...

Thank you Gunner[:)]

<t> I am wondering how the changing weather affected operations... I have spent a long time trying to make some realistic weather... this version still has a few holes in that regard- there is a chance for rain with no clouds lol... but it remains fairly steady nowm with just enough cloud cover at ...

<r> Selchu… yes, although I am torn on some of it. Trying to keep this scenario limited to the region specifically, and using almost any tool I can think of to do that...originally included US bases in Louisianna , PR, Texas, and NC, but the storyline really would also demand Russian (and Cuban ...

Ah.. just noticed the magazine record lol, thank you.
I think weapons free may be a good idea, also, thank you.

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Selchu<br/>
<br/>
Hi rmunie, <br/>
WARNING SPOILERS AHEAD<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Just looking at this and it looks interesting. 1 thing strikes me just before I start, is the ...

<t> I have to say that lessons learned from several of yours, Gunner98, went into this series... I especially altered the original "first day" after playing through your first day and seeing how much fun (and how hectic") many things happening in different areas of the same region could be ...

<t> The storyline will depict worries of strikes on nearby bases necessitating removal of many assets to CONUS. I had however intended to use Roosevelt Roads...and still had it in the oob as recently as the 12th version of this scenario in June, but whittled it down to only what I actually used in ...

Mine reads 1.15.2 after download, so just being certain the 6 is a typo... great additions- as always. Thank you.

Part of a new series... 3 years in the works... let me know what you think.
Thanks.
PS- intended for use with cargo operations, not certain if it works without them...sorry.

Finally home...here is the saved test. Thanks

<r> Here is a quick scenario...note that LHD, CG, and DDG can all operate the Valkyrie... the carrier's 300m deck cannot <E>:)</E><br/>
<br/>
edit...nevermind...strangely enough 7zip files are not supported. My current system does not allow me to download an application to put it into another ...

<t> Yes will try when I get to a better wifi later... I can land those MQ-8/9 series easily and take off... the Valkyrie (Cannot recall its designation right now, but it is an X- I think..) was the specific model that got me testing, once it could not take back off when forced to land on a carrier ...

Tech Support: fb.asp?m=4667654

In my own scen… I had them operating from a LHD...which they did easily as well...but when it was sunk, landed them on a carrier...then never could get them to take off again.

I can see that...just not sure why a destroyer deck can launch them when a carrier cannot