<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Veitikka<br/>
<br/>
My point is that in games like this there never has been a "good", human-like AI opponent that some players seem to be expecting. <br/>
<br/>
I don't know why this forum has very limited attachment sizes. <br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE ...

<t> The AI in this game is a real problem. But isn't so much a problem for this game as it is for the whole wargaming genre. I have noticed the same problem in Combat Mission (although CM somewhat mitigates this by putting more responsibility on the scenario designer to hold the AI's hand, but that ...

<t> So far I have compared it a lot to Combat Mission and Command Ops (in terms of scale it does seem to be right in between those two games).<br/>
<br/>
By way of comparison with Combat Mission. The larger scale means that certain aspects of the fighting need to be a bit more abstract or granular ...

<t> Af1352pasha. Thank you, but I already have the first source. The issue is that it doesn't give information on what kind of M2 or M3 a unit is equipped with (is it an M2A1? M2A2?) and M1A1HAs don't appear anywhere with any unit (maybe no units have been equipped with M1A1HAs yet, but I suspect it ...

<t> I have a, possibly unhealthy, obsession with realism and historical accuracy (although not so unhealthy, as I have learned a LOT of military history in pursuit of highly realistic scenarios). With this game finally out that has taken the form of me trying to build a highly plausible campaign ...