Hi bc games, thanks for your quick reply and your offer to accept a challenge! That is really nice and I am really tempted to jump into this and probably will, but am still struggling a bit. You say the gaming community for the WEGO series is there and alive, which I do not doubt. But is there any o...

Hi there, I am new to the game.. well even haven´t bought it. But from reading the very well and clear written manual I think this game might be exactly my cup of tea. So many clever and interesting design decisions here (fluid ZOC, the supply rules, air warfare rules, etc. very very nice) The only ...

Hi there, I have read the manual and lots of comments for the game and I am very tempted to buy and try. BUT: I have also read, that the AI is not really much of a challenge and the real joy of the game lies in MP-Games. BUT (2): I don´t have any clue, if there is an MP-Community out there for this ...

Thumbs up, Vicousvic, for so precisely naming and addressing more or less all the issues that I have, too!! Couldn´t have said it better and clearer! These mentioned "glitches" are the most crucial and should be addressed by the team with the highest priority if the game is to attract a wi...

For me this is a very frustrating subject, since the possibilities to exploit the engine via the order changes where the single most thing I hoped the devs would adress in this sequel. I can´t believe they worked on this title for so many years and really ignored this big issue. Can anyone confirm, ...

<t> Hey guys, <br/> thanks for all your nice and friendly reactions and comments on this topic. I like fundamental discussions like this! And it isn´t my desire to convince someone to dislike the game or such. <br/> It´s just my dissapointment about the beforementioned intransparency of some fundame...

(Just look at the last dozen posts on this forum and you will unmistakebly see, what I mean, when I talk about people trying to feverishly making sense out of all they can (not) see. And the explanations or answers are an even better example, I am afraid.)

<t> Well, James, thanks for your comment of how much you enjoy the game. That´s what it´s all about, isn´t it? <br/> Me personally can´t find that same joy, although I waited for this game for nearly a year and was very much on the fence for it. <br/> <br/> Ernieschwitz, I am sorry, but I feel you c...

<r> Well, dear ernieschwitz, thank you very much for rating my comment an "ok criticism" and telling me, that my personal view might not be the view every one else in the world takes...<E>:)</E> <br/> <br/> Since you seem to be a friend of nice sayings, let me post another wisdom of the gaming commu...

<t> This whole post is another example of how the things in this game have gone over a certain point of comprehensible structure. What is the sense, I ask, of having such an amount of hard to decipher factors under the hood? Factors that really count if you want to play succesfully, but factors that...

<t> I really tried hard to like this game, since I own all other DC titles and play them a lot. <br/> After playing a couple of smaller and medium sized scenarios and reading all the posts here, I end up giving up on this game. Here is why: <br/> 1: This game suffers heavily from trying to achieve t...

<t> I must clearly contradict. <br/> All three DC titles are in my view much cleaner and easier to read than DC Ardennes. <br/> Before buying dive into this forum and read some posts about recon points or battle calculation and you will see what I mean: this game is in some places unreadable for the...

<t> I know from other games of the series, that using artillery each turn gave massive diminishing returns in firepower, so u had to use them sparsely, say every 3 or 4 rounds only, in order to have a full force artillery strike. <br/> I didn´t find any hint about that or an exact formula for artill...

..and a happy new Year to all you wargaming folks around..[:)]

<t> I am not convinced by the pure fact, that an other game also handles movement like this. <br/> <br/> My point is: if you want to rush, you have to take a certain risk. If you are cautiously proceeding (like in a hex to hex style or something alike) you need more time. Gamewise more time is trans...

<t> Right now, it doesn´t make any difference movement-wise to move a unit hex by hex, but <br/> it helps to lessen the chance to be ambushed significantly, because with every hex moved you get new data about your surrounding. <br/> This may lead cautious players to use a (sort of gamey) hex-by-hex ...

This makes perfect sense and is a good hint! Thanks.
Still I feel there should be a proper description on this important issue in the manual.

Having a calculation that doesn´t work at all, doesn´t seem to help. Wild guessing and testing is a serious drawback
in having fun with the game. Hope Vic notices and has some remedy for this.

<t> Thanks Pedro. But in sum what you are saying is, the predictor doesn´t work correctly. <br/> And that is my point, too. And that is meant far away from the prespective of liking to have a predictor that is a 100 percent guarantee of the outcome. I am very aware of the fact of necessary dice roll...

So maybe that is the point. Thanks!
But in ALL other DC games there was a maximum, like say 24 CPs and it was important to notice that.
So I still would like to see an informed answer about that point..