CV60, maybe if you worked as hard as you snark the database wouldn't be such a shambles.

Then they are stupid. Imagine improving a commercial product for free.

People work for free to get kudos and acclaim from a community (if this weren't true they wouldn't be publishing their work). If I am a part of the community, then by withholding my praise I am contributing to the improvement of the work.

Doing something for free does not exempt you from criticism. "Be grateful for what you have" only exposes the lackadaisical attitude to your "work" (which mostly consists of copying snippets from wikipedia anyway)

doesn't garner a lot of credibility

So are you calling me a liar, or are you saying I should spend more time sucking up to forum veterans before I'm allowed to speak up?

Thank you for your passive aggression, CV60. Have you resolved your automation experiment yet?

<t> LMAO... are you kidding me? Even now, after 5+ years, the descriptions pack from warfaresims(dot)com/?page_id=1876 STILL contains erroneous duplicate entries for over a HUNDRED objects (just grep for "HAWK"). I'm grateful for the efforts of the community and all but don't go saying the problem ...