Search found 4 matches

by Checksumchecks
Sat Dec 18, 2021 8:54 am
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Bugs: Eupen, Ships in port, Blimp strategic bombardment
Replies: 5
Views: 421

RE: Bugs: Eupen, Ships in port, Blimp strategic bombardment

<t> 4. Another bug occurrs when a land unit is shattered: The winning attacker does not gain his NM bonus when the shattered unit was below 5 supply and, regardless of supply, the attackers HQ does not gain any experience for the successful attack. Meanwhile, the losing defender does not lose any NM ...
by Checksumchecks
Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:54 pm
Forum: Strategic Command: World War I
Topic: Belgian capital
Replies: 3
Views: 378

RE: Belgian capital

<t> In my experience Belgian surrender is almost inevitable in case of Entente DoW, so Liege as alternative capital would defintiely be welcome.<br/>
<br/>
Perhaps it could be done dynamically via decision event: Ypres and Liege start out as non-capital towns, but if the CP declare on Belgium, UK ...
by Checksumchecks
Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:01 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Bugs: Eupen, Ships in port, Blimp strategic bombardment
Replies: 5
Views: 421

RE: Bugs: Eupen, Ships in port, Blimp strategic bombardment

And here is the second picture showing that the Austrians suffered not only the 1 pt of damage to their own ship, but also the 5 pt of damage they did to the Italian PD that was at the port.
by Checksumchecks
Fri Dec 17, 2021 6:57 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Bugs: Eupen, Ships in port, Blimp strategic bombardment
Replies: 5
Views: 421

Bugs: Eupen, Ships in port, Blimp strategic bombardment

<t> Hello,<br/>
<br/>
I believe I have found some bugs:<br/>
<br/>
1. In the division-level scenarios the German/Belgian border is drawn incorrectly: The Imperial German town of Eupen is shown to lie on Belgian territory.<br/>
<br/>
2. Successfully attacking enemy ships in port results in ...

Go to advanced search