I've just finished my first matches against the AI.

I'd like to start my first multiplayer match against a player of a similar skill level.

About me:
- Experience: Playing Strategic Command: fairly extensive
- Skill: average, rather poor
- Civil War experience: none, only two matches against the ...

Ok, after some time to think, I'll try to come up with a conclusion:

But first of all:
Big thanks for the match and even more recognition for Jazon and his AAR.
You really set high standards with this.
Your never-give-up mentality always impresses me.
Unfortunately, I tend to give up on a game if ...

First of all, this is a summary from memory and it is the second MP duel in the scenario (also as Allies)

December 41:
• The Japanese bomb the US Pacific Fleet in Pearl Harbor, sinking three battleships
• An impressive landing in Malaysia succeeds, two Japanese units immediately lay siege to ...

I just had another "oh..." moment

and I'll start with this:

Researching “port expansion” alone is not enough;
the desired port must also be expanded

(similar to upgrading with anti-aircraft)

Hello,

Maybe you need a minimum number of posts, no idea

which side do you want to play?
then I will send you a PM with the password.

No, unfortunately I don't use Discord

greetings petish

hi, I now also got scww2 pacific and played two games against the AI.

would now like to start a first multiplay game day of infamy.

Find suitable opponents for it.

My skill level is below average to average, I like the historical setting.
Not so much, exploiting the game mechanics to the ...

hi, after I really thought that I had understood the game and that I was now a useful player...

Reality just caught up with me.

An opponent who was playing his fourth game (as Entente) simply wiped the floor with me.

There are some good let's plays from WW2 in Europe where you can learn ...

Unfortunately I still have the error message

connection error

same here

have the same problem. WW1 doesn't work either

Hello Jazon, briefly my comments on the game and theory as to why the Huns' NM collapsed like this:

- Naval blockade as intense as possible since the start of the game
- The USA went to war faster with diplomacy
- the high losses of the Huns (the most in the game, especially in corps)
- I think you ...

what is the TSAR Event?

same here

ww1 and ww2

here the same. ww1 is also affected

Hi - in all of my recent multi-player games, if the Germans go east in 1914, the Entente immediately sends units to Serbia. With France not under pressure, they can afford to send corps there quickly: you can use naval cruise to send a unit in one move from Marseille to Cetinje, provided the AH ...

with Belgium and the NM unfortunately everything sounds very plausible. But with that, the last ray of hope is really lost, Belgium, France, Germany is currently the only area where I was able to take one or more units from the Germans.

I'll remember units to Russia as a good antidote ...

hmm, but I win a few MPPs per round for that - or what do you mean by "hit"? Diplomacy?


Bavre is probably referring to National Morale. NM will take a big hit for the Western Entente members if they declare war on Belgium. Britain will lose in the neighborhood of 8,000 NM and France 3,000 NM ...

"Do under absolutely no circumstances attack Galicia! Russia will be under heavy attack soon and needs every last man to defend."

check, I made this mistake (once again). :oops:

"If Germans show up on the Balkans, just run for the mountains. Use the detachments as rearguards to delay the enemy ...

hi, I thought I had the basic perspective - but the current game brutally shows me the opposite

Normally I try to be offensive in Galicia, Lemberg, Stanislaw, Premyzel and if possible Krakow. Poland, border Prussia rather defensive.

So far it has worked quite well, but now the enemy has sent what ...

the same thing here, WW1 doesn't work either