Search found 1163 matches

by James Ward
Wed Jun 22, 2016 8:23 pm
Forum: Tech Support
Topic: Crash with 1.01 patch...
Replies: 11
Views: 1499

RE: Crash with 1.01 patch...

The download section lists version 1.01 june 13. Is that the updated fix?
by James Ward
Sun Jun 19, 2016 12:39 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: RIP Lannes and Soult and few things.
Replies: 3
Views: 349

RE: RIP Lannes and Soult and few things.

<t> You could take Russia in a year and not spend any time there in Winter but you needed cards. With the new surrender rules you might not do it if Russia does not surrender immediately. If you have Strategic move cards they are the best. If you don't have them then have a as many Force March cards ...
by James Ward
Wed May 18, 2016 10:58 am
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: British & mulit-player
Replies: 5
Views: 399

RE: British & mulit-player

Yes you would have to force the Brits to engage at some point and not just sit back and let others do the fighting.
by James Ward
Tue May 17, 2016 10:47 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: 1805 Campaign with beta patch
Replies: 7
Views: 555

RE: 1805 Campaign with beta patch

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: gdrover<br/>
<br/>
We have improved the Russian strategic AI and the overall tactical AI for the first update (coming next week!)<br/>
<br/>
We will continue to fine-tune the AI for the coming DLC as well.<br/>
<br/>
Our goal is have the AI act as much like ...
by James Ward
Tue May 17, 2016 6:05 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: Public Beta for Matrix Version
Replies: 60
Views: 2806

RE: Public Beta for Matrix Version

I think they do it where it makes the most sense for them. It's not like it is the official patch.
by James Ward
Thu May 12, 2016 12:11 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: UPDATE!
Replies: 27
Views: 1251

RE: UPDATE!

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: cardolan<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
I have some sugestions. Currently battlefields seems a bit dull. If you have advantage in artillery there is no reason to move at all. I think there must be some randomly generated villages/hills/forest In every battle so it would ...
by James Ward
Tue May 10, 2016 12:11 am
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: Naval part of the game
Replies: 29
Views: 1165

RE: Naval part of the game

I have invaded England before, by playing god with storm cards.
by James Ward
Tue May 10, 2016 12:06 am
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: A couple of questions
Replies: 5
Views: 275

RE: A couple of questions

What would be cool is if the command rating of the leader was the number of units they could command and there were cards that let you bring X number of commanders into a battle.
by James Ward
Sun May 08, 2016 1:31 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: Naval part of the game
Replies: 29
Views: 1165

RE: Naval part of the game

<t> Why not just build ground units that can defeat their forces in battle instead of naval units that will just sit in port? It's not like Nappy has a lot to do in between playing whack a mole with Austria and Prussia. Beating up an English incursion might provide him a little relief!<br/>
<br ...
by James Ward
Sun May 08, 2016 12:41 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: Naval part of the game
Replies: 29
Views: 1165

RE: Naval part of the game

Without giving more value to territory, what is the point of pursuing a naval strategy? There is no real reason for France to leave the Continent. They can win without setting foot in England or Egypt.
by James Ward
Mon May 02, 2016 5:49 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: 1805 Campaign with beta patch
Replies: 7
Views: 555

RE: 1805 Campaign with beta patch

<t> I agree with number 6 a lot. There has to be a reason to take and hold territory. There does not seem to be any reason to ever even contemplate going to Russia or England. And I also agree that battles should not give you many, or even any, points. They should just be the means to gaining ...
by James Ward
Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:15 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: UPDATE!
Replies: 27
Views: 1251

RE: UPDATE!

ORIGINAL: gdrover

We're working on it right now.
Notice on the list the reference to both strategic and tactical AI improvements.


Missed that. Thanks.
by James Ward
Tue Apr 19, 2016 3:40 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: UPDATE!
Replies: 27
Views: 1251

RE: UPDATE!

Looks good.

Any chance the battle AI will be worked on down the road?
by James Ward
Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:15 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)
Replies: 38
Views: 1466

RE: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)

Never noticed that before. Thanks.
by James Ward
Thu Apr 14, 2016 11:19 am
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)
Replies: 38
Views: 1466

RE: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: jack54<br/>
<br/>
I remember picking line and reserve not attacks maybe I missed something, but you're correct it's not the same as auto resolve.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
All you had control over was what units were in the front line. After that the ...
by James Ward
Mon Apr 11, 2016 2:38 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)
Replies: 38
Views: 1466

RE: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: EdinHouston<br/>
<br/>
Well if you weakened cavalry, especially if undisordered cavalry were in the opposing battle group, it would solve much of the problem addressed two posts above. Likewise, if disordered cavalry were more vulnerable, it would make it far ...
by James Ward
Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:43 am
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)
Replies: 38
Views: 1466

RE: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Lava<br/>
<br/>
The problem isn't that Cavalry are too strong, the problem is that they are able to do things which historically would get then whipped out.<br/>
<br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
They are very strong in this game, heavy Cav is 2-3 as ...
by James Ward
Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:01 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)
Replies: 38
Views: 1466

RE: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Uncle_Joe<br/>
<br/>
No, I don't think anyone here has said the game 'sucks'. At all. Quite the contrary, I think all of us enjoyed it to some degree but the replay value is hampered by the questionable battle AI and a few other mechanics which seem to hold it ...
by James Ward
Sat Apr 09, 2016 3:26 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)
Replies: 38
Views: 1466

RE: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Uncle_Joe<br/>
<br/>
The point of requiring the infantry recruitment would be too limit the number of cannon and cav you can field so quickly. Of course as long as the battle AI will just let me stack up in one sector and ignore the others, it doesn't really ...
by James Ward
Fri Apr 08, 2016 6:06 pm
Forum: Victory and Glory: Napoleon
Topic: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)
Replies: 38
Views: 1466

RE: Completed a 2nd campaign (on Emperor)

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Uncle_Joe<br/>
<br/>
Each time they come back in (respawn, whatever), they get 16 new units (on Emperor, 12 on General). So whether they come back in 1 year or 2, they’ll have roughly the same forces (what they had left + the 16 or 12 new units).<br/>
<br/>
I ...

Go to advanced search