<t>I have version 2.0, will I be able to get a direct upgrade to version 3.0? This will be muck appreciated by me and everyone who doesn't fancy the idea of about 4 downloads.<br/>
Oh, and great game, before SPWAW I never liked wargames, you've opened up my eyes, keep up the good work.<br/>
<br ...

<t>well said steve,<br/>
I think that message from steve finishes this string off nicely, let's drop this topic before it gets boring, and somebody please start up a thread on the possability of Internet play (not PBM) as I know it's cropped up a few times in certain areas.<br/>
The End (?)<br/>
<br ...

Hey, I was just wondering if a strategy guide was avaliable for SPWAW.

<t>No, I haven't gone. I was just waiting. <br/>
The Americans attacked Vietnam to try and show off to Russia and the rest of the world by starting a war that could have been prevented. Much like in Hiroshima, they only wanted to show off their 'power' and it backfired spectacularly, leaving America ...

Somehow I fail to see how Custer's Tactics were good. Splitting an outnumbered force against an enemy is one of the most obvious errors. Haven't you ever read Sun Tzu's Art of War?

<t>As I'm sure you all know, the Americans are known throughout history for their lack of tactics and feeling of self superiority. From the Foolish attack on Vietnam to Custer's Last stand, the Americans are not exactly famous for their tactical knowledge and the quality of their troops. So imagine ...

<t>Hey, how about a hypathetical game where all units and countries between The Boer War and now were made and armies from different eras were pitted against each other, with the old armies far outnumbering the modern ones. NO?<br/>
Okay then, so it's a bad idea. I just want to say that I'm doing ...