Thanks Jamiam, I thought it would be that, but had to ask . It would be a rewrite, even the AI would have to be redone.

T.

<t> Cool, thanks guys. Does anyone know how it's being planned out or fixed? Is it going to a IGOYGOWEGO style (simultaneous combat resolve)?<br/>
<br/>
Wondering as a tile based war gamer I've seen all the other fixes done and nothing seems to work as well as the WEGO method. You know the old ...

<t> Not sure, I'd guess it was 1.<br/>
<br/>
But yeah, that would be the problem. Player one had the most freedom as he started out with full movement for all his units, but it was almost impossible to destroy a unit due to Player 2 having full movement. Also if he tried he ran a huge risk of ...

<t> Hard question to word... I was wonding how different the game plays depending on whether you're player 1 or 2.<br/>
<br/>
I played TOAW way back, and my single biggest beef then was that my main tactical concern is whether I was playing as player 1 or 2 and not what my troops were. That kinda ...

<t> Hmm interesting. I loved CC 1 & 2 but stopped at 3 due to the AI pathfinding and the horrible new spotting rules (tanks picking out inf from 300m away when they are prone in wheat fields etc.). Was interested when I found out about Cross of Iron... but looks like I'll wait and see.<br/>
<br ...

<t>I'm pretty sure about this but the manual says you are hull down if you 'aren't stationary' and in the following locations.<br/>
<br/>
I'm assuming this is meant to be ARE stationary. This also creates the question.. if you move into a Rough hex, are you considered hull down in the next enemies ...