Here it is, I believe. But you probably found it already... https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=11920&t=386355 Hi Rosseau, Thanks for the response and yes this was exactly what I was looking for. In fact, I've ended up invoking a number of the mods provided with the game includin...

I'm told there may be some mods available that will make the road and railways on the game map easier to distinquish.

Can anyone recommend one?

I recently purchased this game using my 21-year membership discount and used the Product ID provided to add it to my Steam Library so that I could join the other players in the steam community to discuss the game. However, whilst everything else seems to be working normally I am unable to create Ste...

Ok! thanks guys that answered my concerns. Looks like its best to stick with Pacific War.

I'm really not into logistic's management, thats what I employ a chief of staff for.

<t> Hi guys,<br/> <br/> Sorry for the intrusion but I'm thinking of buying WiTP and would like a bit of feedback and advice before committing to an order.<br/> <br/> I've been playing Gary Grigsby's Pacific War on and off for years and so I am quite keen to get an more up to date remake with a few m...

<t> I may be wrong but as far as I can see what the Options Screen is providing is the ability to switch game features off, not decide what level of involvement one wants in micro-managing them.<br/> &nbsp;<br/> Having said that COG has the option to auto-manage trade, diplomacy and military dev...

<t> @Ironclad<br/> I had a look at the screen shots of FOF and thought it looked remarkably like COG, so your confirmation that it is merely confirms what I already suspected.  Personally, I rapidly tired of COG which puts a heavy emphasis on logistic's requiring my to spend hours working as an army...

Not sure about this gap, I already have a game that does that called 'American Civil War - From Sumpter to Appomattox' by iMagic designed by Frank Hunter and I've owned it years.

<t> Whats lacking is any recognition of the concept of 'the fleet in being'.&nbsp; Napoleon recognised that to obtain an enemies surrender one first had to neutralise or destroy their feild army.&nbsp; As was proven in Russia merely capturing a city, even a capitol is not enough to force the...

Yep! but combined with the National Morale concept the army strength and readiness&nbsp;don't make a lot of difference.&nbsp; Next move one Frenchman and a trained monkey could walk into my capital and force me to surrender anyway.

Thanks, I've more or less given up, but its nice to get a reply anyway.

<t> Personally, I think its more of a US market fetish problem.<br/> <br/> Statistically, the two most wargamed periods (worldwide) are WW2 and Napoleonic, with ACW coming in a poor third.&nbsp; But I'm still waiting for a decent Napoleonic game and yet ACW has been done to death three times ove...

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Gray_Lensman<br/> Didz, believe it or not FoF is not just another Civil War game. I, too, was sceptical at first, but now that I have played it awhile, the depth of it puts all the other civil war games to shame.<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE> But, its still just another A...

<t> Had a classic situation in my last battle. The French had conducted their usual invasion of Austria at the start of the 1805 campaign but this time I actually managed to engineer a battle with favourable numbers and even some Russian Allies. Though for some reason the Russian Corps spent the ent...

<t> Hmm! well at the moment its proving pretty difficult to play with all this programmer interference. I've just tried again on the 'easy' setting in the hope that it would reduce the railroading but I still found I wasn't allowed to win a battle against the French even though I had routed their en...

<t> A couple more quick questions. As usual I've trawled through the manual, and the tutorial, and Relegh's Guide and come up blank after over an hour of wasted effort.<br/> <br/> 1) Can anyone explain screening?<br/> It gets mentioned in relation to artillery but nobody explains exactly what condit...

Sounds more like the sort of concept I'd expect in a WW2 game to me.&nbsp; Russia in 1805 was not a democracy and the Tzar didn't need popular approval for his decisions.&nbsp; As for insurrectionists I think their about 100 years early.

<t> Well I think I'm going to take a break from Crown and Glory.&nbsp; It seems to me that the game goes to great lengths to model some aspects of gameplay and then runs out of idea's when it gets to others.&nbsp; I certainly don't like the way the programmer has chosen to interupt my game t...

<t> Except of course that historically the Moscow did fall, and was burned to the ground but Russia did not surrender. The other point worth noting is that Moscow was not the true capital of Russia, the main administrative centre was St.Petersburg.<br/> <br/> It annoys me that Russia is denied the s...

<r> I'm a bit annoyed at the minute. I've been very carefully familiarising myself with this game using the Russian faction as a test bed and so far I thought I was doing quite well.<br/> <br/> I had managed to sort out my economy so that I was steadily building units, growing my population and deve...