Perhaps the multiplier should be lowered a bit further, to 0.66 for 1944+ or just for 1945+, to facilitate the creation of TGs with 4 CVs, not unimaginable in 1945 or 1946.

<t>I'm not sure if this issue was addressed in a previous PWME upgrade but page 38 of the manual indicates that when launching carrier strikes, U.S Navy CVs are penalised compared to their Japanese counterparts. Enterprise for instance consumes three carrier points during each check when launching ...

<t>I hadn't thought about giving the ships Indian nationality, perhaps because the only action involving Indian ships in WW2 that I know of is the heroic clash between their Minesweeper Bengal and two Japanese AMCs. Not a proud day in the history of the IJN.<br/>
<br/>
For the British, my scenario ...

<t>I came up with a way around the issue of ships being withdrawn from the Far Eastern Fleet. I amended the scenario files to convert all British ships to either Australian or New Zealander nationality. By spring 1944, the need had passed for large numbers of fast capital ships in the Atlantic so I ...

<t>Three minor issues really.<br/>
<br/>
In the Leyte Gulf scenario (Other Campaigns -- D), the Allies have 18 Rudderow destroyer escorts (3 groups of 6) at Japanese-held Maloelap Island. The Japanese can make a task force with them but can't assign a commander since the ships are not of Japanese ...

<t>While checking out the screenshot of Japan proper, I noticed that a city named Kita-Kyushu. This was officially adopted as the name of a municipality created in 1963 by the merger of several smaller towns and cities, one of which was Kokura (one of the alternate A-Bomb targets). I'm not sure if ...