got one

<r>I've been playing PacWar since some years now. I think its time for my first PBEM game, so I seek a Japanese player.<br/>
<br/>
If you are interested, drop me a mail to <EMAIL email="sirdarcy@gmx.net"><s>[email]</s>sirdarcy@gmx.net<e>[/email]</e></EMAIL><br/>
<br/>
If you want to use house rules ...

Hey Great!

Always remember: screen shots are welcome

They are right. Do you really think, anyone did buy Fortress Europe when played a demo?

I think Mogami is right with point one. It was the Il2... its subvariant il10 was also in production after WW2

I am going to lead an expedition and we're (me and the brothers Jimmy Blenkinsop) going to climb both peaks of Mount Kilimanjaro.

Well, well.

Ok, and what about TFs with a lot of carriers? I think I read once that a TF commander only can handle a certain number efficently (depents on his air rating?)

This joke gets funnier each time I hear it...

I cant even believe that people fell for it.

jupp, just changed our nicks. shouldnt be too bad, since we had only about 20 posts or so.

My idea I'm afraid

Jolly good, jolly good.

I think the Mk14 is a better protection for enemy ships than any Japanese Destroyer

yes yes, but anyway, the asw capabilities of the Japaneses navys are pretty useless. So why even care to use Destroyers?

And the little ships get mauled in surface combats every time by bigger ships.

I hope there are better solutions in UV and WitP

<t>What are the negative aspects of creating task forces only with carriers or big ships? <br/>
<br/>
When I played PAC War some years ago, I only put in big ships, and left all Destroyers for ASW duties in the Port.<br/>
<br/>
Are there any positive aspects of putting smaller units into a taskforce ...

Just the first post