I changed the name of a battlegroup but in the game it retained the old name.Perhaps the BG names are hardcoded so I should give up looking for a way to change them???

I managed to change everything I wanted except the unit names.I mean I changed the names in bgroups and fpools and replaced the text files in BASE folder,but when I open the game and try to create a new scenario the battle groups names are unchanged! Am I missing anything???

<t> If I set 3 objective tracks,will the PO use one of them by default or do I have to trigger the Force 1(2) Track event for the first turn?If I edit the Force 1 Track to switch to track 2 in the first turn and for the same turn I edit it to switch to track 3 with a probability of 30% for both how ...

<t> Sorry for disturbing again guys,but I found another one:The German motorised MdmArtillery Battery has four 10.5cm caliber guns .Instead,should be the &nbsp;15cm cal. sFH18 as is correctly provided to the horse-drawn mdm battery estab.Please note that the motor Mdm Arty Bn.&nbsp;estab is also ...

I also noted that the mounted recon cavalry has the same speed as foot infantry.Is that normal?And if the same speed value is not set by accident,what is the difference between the mounted and foot troops?

<t> I took a look at the British Light AA Estabs and I saw something strange: the "1m-uk-LAA Sect-40mm" Estab has a speed of only 1kph(thou it has 2 motorizet tractord),but the same Australian class of estabs ("1m-au.cf-LAA Sect-40mm" for ex.) has a speed of 6kph (wich I think is normal).Is the UK ...

After the last patch I saw the "Calculate visibility tables" is missing from the Map Maker menu.Have I done something wrong,or is it deliberately eliminated?And If it is,how is the game speeding up the LOS calculation during the play?

<t> Yeah...I see.So&nbsp;let me see if I correctly understood: even if Vickers has an impressive A Armor value,having a max 20 armor penetration val it can only kill the Panzer 2 (with a 35mm front armor) only with a side or rear hit,and this&nbsp; from a maximum 250 meters range.Beyond this range ...

<t> OK,I looked on other posts and checked again the armor penetration of the 50 cal HMG,but still intrigued by the fact that even if the AP value of the 50cal is smaller than that of the 2cm KwK 30 L55 tank gun,the Panzer 2F has a much weaker anti armor value than the gunless Vickers! Any reason ...

<t> I tried to create a balanced scenario,but was stopped in my track by a disturbing issue: <br/>
<br/>
I saw the armament of the Vickers IV light tank consists only of 2 MG with no armor penetration value,while the 2cm gun on the PZ 2F is a better weapon from this point of view.But the "1m-uk.ad ...

I liked the HTTR system where I could assign more than 200% to&nbsp;every estab.It provided support for more creative freedom.

<r> Hi,I did a small test with a supersized unit(estab 200%),and after I started the scenario,the unit had a strange force mix.The number of men seems to be all right,but the equioment is less than it should be.12 Tanks instead of 24.This is the "1m-hr.pzd-Mdm Pz Coy-PzD 5" estab and I'm running the ...

<r> flak bn:anti-armor 67.So the sum of the anti armor values is not the same with the one displayed in the HQ unit tab,and if its own anti-armor value is added(23),we have a grand total of 184,compared to the 117 shown in the unit summary tab.<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com ...

<r> 2nd coy 47 pts anti-armor<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/7242/6A1355BBC39342D5B8C3257EC4EB571B.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/7242/6A1355BBC39342D5B8C3257EC4EB571B.jpg"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums ...

<r> 1 coy: 47 pts anti-armor<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/7242/25799B5ABEEE466EB9AE987E548B242C.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/7242/25799B5ABEEE466EB9AE987E548B242C.jpg"><LINK_TEXT text="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums ...

<r> this is the Kg Knaust HQ with 117 total value of anti armor.<br/>
<br/>
<IMG src="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/7242/AC50EED74E9747839F3ED2CAD339E227.jpg"><s>[img]</s><URL url="https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/7242/AC50EED74E9747839F3ED2CAD339E227.jpg"><LINK_TEXT text ...

In a test scenario I have a regiment of 3 battalions each one with 451 anti-armor value,but the whole regiment has only 688 anti-armor points instead of 1353.Is this a bug,or is there a complicated method of calculating the points?
Thanks in advance!!!

thanks very much for your usefull answers.It helped a lot!

<t> Yes,but can the AI enemy build a bridge over a river that never had a crossing and the only valid crossing have to be built during the game?Or if there is one single crossing point,is the AI able to build a bridge elsewhere to avoid the strong defence it is supposed to meet at the only existing ...

hmm but does that mean that it won't be possible to make a river crossing scenario with no bridge or other crossing point at the start of the scenario,or if there is a bridge to create the option for the AI forces to build a bridge elsewere in order to outmaneuver the human player???