<t>I agree with the fact that sub could be spotted while looking for the good position for louchning torpedoes. What surprises me is that it was destroyed by 8" shells. Do you know any such case from WWII? I don't have great knowledge of naval history, but It seems to me that big guns has less ...

My great sub crew was caught sound asleep during beautiful June night and CA Northampton had made swiss cheese of it with some 8'' shells. Were they drunk or what? I would like to have an option "Sake supply" on/off, but I am afraid it would be micromanagement.

<t>It is coused by that cowboy spirit of your TF staff (on Japanese side it is kamikaze desire of autodestruction in the name of the emperor). So no matter if you can lounch planes or not, you have CAP or not. You TF is going to attack. <br/>
First act than think is the way commanders in UV wrere ...

<r>It is not just you. Sometimes it looks quite funny. Once i made small experiment. I made carrier TF and set all fighters on CAP and all bobmers on training 0. The carrier battle looked like that: AI TF was reacting coming closer and closer to my CF but it didn't attack. It ended being one hex ...

<t>HMSWarspite. You are right that there were many factors that decided about win or loose the air war. But as it is wrong to say that pilots experience is the only important factor, it is also not true that plane specs decide about outcome of air confrontation. As it is in UV and (what I heared) in ...

<t>I would like to know how AI problem is resolved in UV. <br/>
I've noticed recently that AI has information how many planes covers tasks forces. So if you put your carriers one hex near enemy TF and other small TF few hexes away, AI will go after that second TF leaving carriers alone. I wonder if ...