<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Regardless, Its nice for a change to not have to be a rocket scientist to understand supply rules. <e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Good point on the SSI/Gettysburg/Antietam: actually it sounds like they were more complex, though they didn't get the neat shading on the ...

Yes, the A/I can be a little slow.... It's better on defense, but still a sucker for overruns that turn out to be unwise. You will be particularly disappointed by the A/I's capacity to run the KP Russian attack.

Play against a human.

<r> Yes, I would say so.<br/>
<br/>
Very clean strategic (or rather operational) game that focuses the player on the need to make decisions. <br/>
<br/>
It is a good deal more abstract than TOAW or PzC: units have 2, 3, or 4 steps and numeric ratings rather then 57 jeeps, 10 squads, and 22 ...

<t> I agree that the KP supply model is excellent: very clean and effective.<br/>
<br/>
OAW and PzC seem either to fall short, or to be somewhat opaque.<br/>
<br/>
I think KP's main competition in this regard is The Gamer's/Multiman Publishing's Operational Combat System: supply has real bite in ...