<t> Given the wast amount of time allready invested in the game, I am confident this title will be released. <br/>
I am hoping Steve has some idea as to what remains to be done and has an idea of how long it will take&nbsp;- if not, then I for one would be worried. Judging from the comments by ...

We are to peoble trying to start an IP-game. Even with both Firewalls down, neither of us were able to choose the option to join a game. This makes it some what dificult to play a game [:(]

If any one has gotn IP-play to work, please do tell what you did to be able to join.

we never get to choose join, after inserting the IP-adress...

just downloading the game now - why not learn in multiplay
If your game, id like to take Ottomans

<t> Good AAR. Nice to read how the game plays<br/>
The past 3 AARs have left me wondering of the capabilities of the AI... <br/>
<br/>
Why would Russia and Spain figth it out on Prussian territory? What could they possibly gain by doing that?<br/>
Allso it seems the AI should have avoided an ...

<t> We played a boardgame version of EiA with some house-rule changes to Sweden including a splitting Sweden in more provinces. We did not use the EiH map.<br/>
<br/>
The sweden-rules we played with was a crossover betwen a oficial variation from "The General", a unoficial unplaytested version i ...

<t> Sweden as a Mayor - i've actually tried playing this puny country in a variation 1792 senario. Let me tell you it is not fun.[:(]<br/>
We upgraded its army to consist of 6 corps and she had 2 leaders of some value (1792 has very few leaders and all but the French (several), Austrians (Charles ...