Search found 3791 matches

by Yamato hugger
Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:06 pm
Forum: The War Room
Topic: Developer's Commentary: Airfield Stacking
Replies: 62
Views: 2748

RE: Developer's Commentary: Airfield Stacking

<r> Elf himself said back in Feb that he didnt agree with the rule and he had some ideas on how to make it better (last 2 paragraphs). Dont know about you, but I'd like to hear what his plan was.<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: TheElf<br/>
<br/>
It's been a long time, but I am trying to ...
by Yamato hugger
Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:02 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Bases
Replies: 15
Views: 390

RE: Bases

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger<br/>
<br/>
But with one of the patches, you cant change a base to a restricted command.<br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
I stand corrected. I tried to change an Ozzie base to Dutch command and it wouldnt let me, so I had guessed they changed ...
by Yamato hugger
Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:49 am
Forum: The War Room
Topic: Developer's Commentary: Airfield Stacking
Replies: 62
Views: 2748

RE: Developer's Commentary: Airfield Stacking

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: TheElf<br/>
<br/>
Again YH, insightful, informed ad hominem. I salute you. Keep up the great AE support.<br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
I dont work for Matrix. It isnt my job to sell this game. I am just voicing my personal opinion. You on the other ...
by Yamato hugger
Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:36 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Global "turn off replacements" Why would I do this?
Replies: 19
Views: 365

RE: Global "turn off replacements" Why would I do this?

When you only have 20 infantry squads, you dont want them going to a restricted base force on the west coast. You want them going to combat units as a priority.
by Yamato hugger
Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:27 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Bases
Replies: 15
Views: 390

RE: Bases

<t> But with one of the patches, you cant change a base to a restricted command.<br/>
<br/>
So really, there is no point. Its a leftover from PacWar. The HQ system they had envisioned putting in place didnt make it, so base HQs are purely cosmetic (except as already noted the restricted ones for ...
by Yamato hugger
Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:19 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Airfield Penalties
Replies: 60
Views: 3017

RE: Airfield Penalties

<r> To refresh your memory:<br/>
<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger<br/>
<br/>
<B><s>[b]</s>I'm sorry, I had something in my eye, tell me again why having a groups limit makes sense to someone.<e>[/b]</e></B><br/>
<br/>
<LINK><s>[link]</s>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cactus ...
by Yamato hugger
Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:11 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Airfield Penalties
Replies: 60
Views: 3017

RE: Airfield Penalties

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: TheElf<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger<br/>
<br/>
Frankly, I have been on this bandwagon from the start. <B><s>[b]</s>There is no logic to it what so ever, just something he wants.<e>[/b]</e></B> Frankly, the only way its going to get changed ...
by Yamato hugger
Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:28 am
Forum: The War Room
Topic: Developer's Commentary: Airfield Stacking
Replies: 62
Views: 2748

RE: Developer's Commentary: Airfield Stacking

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: TheElf<br/>
<br/>
<B><s>[b]</s><I><s>[i]</s><br/>
If an Airfield has too many aircraft (physical space) or groups (administrative) present, then the airfield is deemed overstacked. And is indicated by an ‘*’ next to the airfield.<br/>
An overstacked airfield ...
by Yamato hugger
Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:21 am
Forum: The War Room
Topic: When to adopt a defensive strategy as Japan?
Replies: 18
Views: 404

RE: When to adopt a defensive strategy as Japan?

You should have a defensive line goal in mind Dec 6th.
by Yamato hugger
Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:29 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Airfield Penalties
Replies: 60
Views: 3017

RE: Airfield Penalties

<t> Frankly, I have been on this bandwagon from the start. There is no logic to it what so ever, just something he wants. Frankly, the only way its going to get changed is if enough of you complain about it. So, if you want it changed, its up to YOU to make your wishes heard. My 1 voice isnt enough ...
by Yamato hugger
Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:20 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Airfield Penalties
Replies: 60
Views: 3017

RE: Airfield Penalties

Guess the pilots themselves reload the planes [:D]
by Yamato hugger
Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:19 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Airfield Penalties
Replies: 60
Views: 3017

RE: Airfield Penalties

ORIGINAL: Al Boone

YH- What about casualties and repairs due to overstack?

I have no idea what the exact formula is. I doubt any of the air guys are going to say either.
by Yamato hugger
Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:17 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Airfield Penalties
Replies: 60
Views: 3017

RE: Airfield Penalties

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Graymane<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Al Boone<br/>
3) Is it true that <B><s>[b]</s>no aircraft recieve penalties due to deficiencies in aviation support <e>[/b]</e></B> except bombers on level bombing missions as per rules page 214, overstack ...
by Yamato hugger
Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:52 am
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Airfield Penalties
Replies: 60
Views: 3017

RE: Airfield Penalties

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Al Boone<br/>
<br/>
Herwin, I am aware of all that you state. It actually should be fairly intuitive to all. <B><s>[b]</s>My questions relate to game mechanics<e>[/b]</e></B> rather than your statements.<br/>
<br/>
1) Are seaplanes at bases with airfields ...
by Yamato hugger
Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:24 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: 4E bombers in AE
Replies: 24
Views: 386

RE: 4E bombers in AE

Probably better they didnt.
by Yamato hugger
Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:41 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: 4E bombers in AE
Replies: 24
Views: 386

RE: 4E bombers in AE

B-17s were the first skip bombers. Due to their lack of maneuverability they gave up the practice, but they were the ones that proved the concept.
by Yamato hugger
Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:39 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Supplies going to bases that don't need them...
Replies: 6
Views: 184

RE: Supplies going to bases that don't need them...

<t> Heh, well that makes 2 of us. Unfortunately we didnt get that far in testing to see if the supply and production stuff worked. And frankly it probably would have taken years for us to get to the point where that COULD have been tested, so Im not knocking that. Supplies and resources always ...
by Yamato hugger
Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:35 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Supplies going to bases that don't need them...
Replies: 6
Views: 184

RE: Supplies going to bases that don't need them...

No, my understanding is they creep along like little inchworms.
by Yamato hugger
Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:34 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: 14 months of turns or
Replies: 31
Views: 444

RE: 14 months of turns or

Certainly not in my games. I leave nothing under computer control, ever (unless you count a handful of CS convoys).
by Yamato hugger
Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:42 pm
Forum: War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition
Topic: Supplies going to bases that don't need them...
Replies: 6
Views: 184

RE: Supplies going to bases that don't need them...

Most likely supplies passing through on their way elsewhere.

Go to advanced search