Wolfsburg, FRG
Below is a custom map of the eastern approaches to Braunschweig, centered on the city of Wolfsburg, and the A2 Autobahn.

Map uses 16m elevation levels as opposed to the game's 50m elevation level. The remainder of the MapDataType.xlsx is the same that ships with the game.

The jpg ...

You can change that in the Options.

The area around Wolfenbüttel, FRG, held strategic importance in any 1980s Cold War Gone Hot scenario due to its location near the Inner German Border, roughly 30 km from the East German frontier. Situated between Braunschweig and the Harz Mountains, it provided a crucial corridor for Warsaw Pact ...

I enjoy Regiments, the difference between AB1/2 and Regiments is abstraction. Regiments has a lot of abstraction, which is fine and works for that design philosophy. Everything about the Armored Brigade engine is 1:1, from the units, to maps, to combat resolution, which in the end makes it much more ...

Widukind59 wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2024 8:24 pm And i was a member of the 6.Pz.Gren.Div
waiting in Eutin for the coming of the WP
I heard in this time that the polish army will be the attackers

The possible fight north of the Elbe has always fascinated.

I would expect to see ERA equipped T-64's and T-80's for any action that shifts north of FCSS. Certainly by 89, the bulk of the tanks in the 8th Guards Army and 3rd Shock Army seem to have had added ERA.

The German III Corps covered the sector north of the Fulda Gap. This map is located within that sector, along the border region northeast of Bad Hersfeld.

The map uses a customized jpg file for the in-game image, and features 20m elevations levels instead of the game's standard 50m.

Sontra, FRG ...

Been working on this for awhile.
https://t.co/aHFblOFPTT

Does your modified force data (excel sheets) only affect this scenario. IE- will having them in those folders affect all other scenarios?


No effect having them in the folders - in fact you don't even need the excel sheets to run the scenarios.

I actually was looking at some updates to this in ...

I've used minor lakes in custom maps to simulate wider rivers that don't consume a 500m hex. Works perfect.

Thanks. I wanted to test with as big as map as possible, and then if necessary scale down in the future.

Maybe time to look at adding a couple simple BP's to this.

https://twitter.com/22sec2/status/16936 ... 65331?s=20
https://twitter.com/22sec2/status/16936 ... 39318?s=20
https://twitter.com/22sec2/status/16937 ... 12858?s=20

I would be grateful if anyone wants to give all this a shot and give me some feedback.

Version 0.90 (Beta)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YcMUzv66z0sVnDXd92LkhNH7FX-tlskm/view?usp=sharing
Read Me file with instructions included in zip.

What have I done?
1. A 60km x 48km map centered on the ...

It's really up to whomever is creating the BP's for a scenario, and has its own set of challenges the more complicated the plan becomes. I suppose not unlike real life. I've now created about ten scenarios with three BP's for each side, and I still am working on getting better. We will see what gets ...

Notice the modified sighting ranges. Trying some different things too....

I think I found a possible winner.

That's good stuff. Dug in infantry in good positions are tough. Good terrain analysis is important too. The cover and concealment should be something players are aware of, as is checking LoS.

Bored on a Sunday. Settled for 16m elevation levels. Also experimenting with trails through forest and mountains.