Static units without * devices

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
Moss Orleni
Posts: 201
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:36 am

Static units without * devices

Post by Moss Orleni »

I was always under the impression that static units were units that contain at leat one static device, and that a static device is a device marked with an * on the LCU screen.
However, there are several LCUs that have a 'Static' load cost but do not contain any static devices. Example: Jaluit Naval Fortress, or other Japanese CD units

So, my question: If no static devices are present, what makes an LCU static?

Cheers,

Moss
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12467
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Static units without * devices

Post by michaelm75au »

Devices only show if there are at least one (active or disabled) in the unit.
So in the case you mention, there are probably no actual devices presently in the unit.

This I also found confusing, thinking that there was a bug somewhere.

In a future code patch, I am showing the static device even if there is no current active/disabled ones in the unit.
This should help explain why the unit is classed as static.

Michael
Moss Orleni
Posts: 201
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:36 am

RE: Static units without * devices

Post by Moss Orleni »

OK, thx very much for the info!

One more (for the road): is a static device determined by having a load cost of 9999, by having the Attributes field of the device set at an odd number (ie the first bitmap position at 1), or a combination of both?

Cheers,

Moss
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12467
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Static units without * devices

Post by michaelm75au »

Either.
The 9999 load is the original (old) method.
The attribute bit makes more sense and allows an actual cost to be given to the static devices which allows better use in upgrades and replacements.
Michael
Moss Orleni
Posts: 201
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:36 am

RE: Static units without * devices

Post by Moss Orleni »

Thanks,

Moss
User avatar
DeriKuk
Posts: 355
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:44 am
Location: Alberta
Contact:

RE: Static units without * devices

Post by DeriKuk »

What's with those STATIC Indian infantry brigades in Rawalpindi (2 units) and their sibling in Lucknow?
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Static units without * devices

Post by m10bob »

Dunno if its' related or not, but I have found a few USN base service units that can be transported to theatre from CONUS, but once there, cannot be put back into strategic mode, so they can not be moved elsewhere..Annoying, and I gotta wonder about the historocity of that??

Is "historocity" a word?...No?...Well, then give me the credit![:D]
Image

Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”